Cargando…
Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary care program on recovery and return to work of patients after gynaecological surgery; design of a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Return to work after gynaecological surgery takes much longer than expected, irrespective of the level of invasiveness. In order to empower patients in recovery and return to work, a multidisciplinary care program consisting of an e-health intervention and integrated care management incl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3355012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22296950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-29 |
_version_ | 1782233306145751040 |
---|---|
author | Vonk Noordegraaf, Antonie Huirne, Judith AF Brölmann, Hans AM Emanuel, Mark H van Kesteren, Paul JM Kleiverda, Gunilla Lips, Jos P Mozes, Alexander Thurkow, Andreas L van Mechelen, Willem Anema, Johannes R |
author_facet | Vonk Noordegraaf, Antonie Huirne, Judith AF Brölmann, Hans AM Emanuel, Mark H van Kesteren, Paul JM Kleiverda, Gunilla Lips, Jos P Mozes, Alexander Thurkow, Andreas L van Mechelen, Willem Anema, Johannes R |
author_sort | Vonk Noordegraaf, Antonie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Return to work after gynaecological surgery takes much longer than expected, irrespective of the level of invasiveness. In order to empower patients in recovery and return to work, a multidisciplinary care program consisting of an e-health intervention and integrated care management including participatory workplace intervention was developed. METHODS/DESIGN: We designed a randomized controlled trial to assess the effect of the multidisciplinary care program on full sustainable return to work in patients after gynaecological surgery, compared to usual clinical care. Two hundred twelve women (18-65 years old) undergoing hysterectomy and/or laparoscopic adnexal surgery on benign indication in one of the 7 participating (university) hospitals in the Netherlands are expected to take part in this study at baseline. The primary outcome measure is sick leave duration until full sustainable return to work and is measured by a monthly calendar of sickness absence during 26 weeks after surgery. Secondary outcome measures are the effect of the care program on general recovery, quality of life, pain intensity and complications, and are assessed using questionnaires at baseline, 2, 6, 12 and 26 weeks after surgery. DISCUSSION: The discrepancy between expected physical recovery and actual return to work after gynaecological surgery contributes to the relevance of this study. There is strong evidence that long periods of sick leave can result in work disability, poorer general health and increased risk of mental health problems. We expect that this multidisciplinary care program will improve peri-operative care, contribute to a faster return to work of patients after gynaecological surgery and, as a consequence, will reduce societal costs considerably. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): NTR2087 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3355012 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33550122012-05-18 Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary care program on recovery and return to work of patients after gynaecological surgery; design of a randomized controlled trial Vonk Noordegraaf, Antonie Huirne, Judith AF Brölmann, Hans AM Emanuel, Mark H van Kesteren, Paul JM Kleiverda, Gunilla Lips, Jos P Mozes, Alexander Thurkow, Andreas L van Mechelen, Willem Anema, Johannes R BMC Health Serv Res Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Return to work after gynaecological surgery takes much longer than expected, irrespective of the level of invasiveness. In order to empower patients in recovery and return to work, a multidisciplinary care program consisting of an e-health intervention and integrated care management including participatory workplace intervention was developed. METHODS/DESIGN: We designed a randomized controlled trial to assess the effect of the multidisciplinary care program on full sustainable return to work in patients after gynaecological surgery, compared to usual clinical care. Two hundred twelve women (18-65 years old) undergoing hysterectomy and/or laparoscopic adnexal surgery on benign indication in one of the 7 participating (university) hospitals in the Netherlands are expected to take part in this study at baseline. The primary outcome measure is sick leave duration until full sustainable return to work and is measured by a monthly calendar of sickness absence during 26 weeks after surgery. Secondary outcome measures are the effect of the care program on general recovery, quality of life, pain intensity and complications, and are assessed using questionnaires at baseline, 2, 6, 12 and 26 weeks after surgery. DISCUSSION: The discrepancy between expected physical recovery and actual return to work after gynaecological surgery contributes to the relevance of this study. There is strong evidence that long periods of sick leave can result in work disability, poorer general health and increased risk of mental health problems. We expect that this multidisciplinary care program will improve peri-operative care, contribute to a faster return to work of patients after gynaecological surgery and, as a consequence, will reduce societal costs considerably. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): NTR2087 BioMed Central 2012-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3355012/ /pubmed/22296950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-29 Text en Copyright ©2012 Vonk Noordegraaf et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Vonk Noordegraaf, Antonie Huirne, Judith AF Brölmann, Hans AM Emanuel, Mark H van Kesteren, Paul JM Kleiverda, Gunilla Lips, Jos P Mozes, Alexander Thurkow, Andreas L van Mechelen, Willem Anema, Johannes R Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary care program on recovery and return to work of patients after gynaecological surgery; design of a randomized controlled trial |
title | Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary care program on recovery and return to work of patients after gynaecological surgery; design of a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary care program on recovery and return to work of patients after gynaecological surgery; design of a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary care program on recovery and return to work of patients after gynaecological surgery; design of a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary care program on recovery and return to work of patients after gynaecological surgery; design of a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary care program on recovery and return to work of patients after gynaecological surgery; design of a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | effectiveness of a multidisciplinary care program on recovery and return to work of patients after gynaecological surgery; design of a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3355012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22296950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-29 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vonknoordegraafantonie effectivenessofamultidisciplinarycareprogramonrecoveryandreturntoworkofpatientsaftergynaecologicalsurgerydesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT huirnejudithaf effectivenessofamultidisciplinarycareprogramonrecoveryandreturntoworkofpatientsaftergynaecologicalsurgerydesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT brolmannhansam effectivenessofamultidisciplinarycareprogramonrecoveryandreturntoworkofpatientsaftergynaecologicalsurgerydesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT emanuelmarkh effectivenessofamultidisciplinarycareprogramonrecoveryandreturntoworkofpatientsaftergynaecologicalsurgerydesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vankesterenpauljm effectivenessofamultidisciplinarycareprogramonrecoveryandreturntoworkofpatientsaftergynaecologicalsurgerydesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kleiverdagunilla effectivenessofamultidisciplinarycareprogramonrecoveryandreturntoworkofpatientsaftergynaecologicalsurgerydesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lipsjosp effectivenessofamultidisciplinarycareprogramonrecoveryandreturntoworkofpatientsaftergynaecologicalsurgerydesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mozesalexander effectivenessofamultidisciplinarycareprogramonrecoveryandreturntoworkofpatientsaftergynaecologicalsurgerydesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT thurkowandreasl effectivenessofamultidisciplinarycareprogramonrecoveryandreturntoworkofpatientsaftergynaecologicalsurgerydesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanmechelenwillem effectivenessofamultidisciplinarycareprogramonrecoveryandreturntoworkofpatientsaftergynaecologicalsurgerydesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT anemajohannesr effectivenessofamultidisciplinarycareprogramonrecoveryandreturntoworkofpatientsaftergynaecologicalsurgerydesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial |