Cargando…

Is that a belt or a snake? object attentional selection affects the early stages of visual sensory processing

BACKGROUND: There is at present crescent empirical evidence deriving from different lines of ERPs research that, unlike previously observed, the earliest sensory visual response, known as C1 component or P/N80, generated within the striate cortex, might be modulated by selective attention to visual...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zani, Alberto, Proverbio, Alice M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3355026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22300540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-8-6
_version_ 1782233309400530944
author Zani, Alberto
Proverbio, Alice M
author_facet Zani, Alberto
Proverbio, Alice M
author_sort Zani, Alberto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is at present crescent empirical evidence deriving from different lines of ERPs research that, unlike previously observed, the earliest sensory visual response, known as C1 component or P/N80, generated within the striate cortex, might be modulated by selective attention to visual stimulus features. Up to now, evidence of this modulation has been related to space location, and simple features such as spatial frequency, luminance, and texture. Additionally, neurophysiological conditions, such as emotion, vigilance, the reflexive or voluntary nature of input attentional selection, and workload have also been related to C1 modulations, although at least the workload status has received controversial indications. No information is instead available, at present, for objects attentional selection. METHODS: In this study object- and space-based attention mechanisms were conjointly investigated by presenting complex, familiar shapes of artefacts and animals, intermixed with distracters, in different tasks requiring the selection of a relevant target-category within a relevant spatial location, while ignoring the other shape categories within this location, and, overall, all the categories at an irrelevant location. EEG was recorded from 30 scalp electrode sites in 21 right-handed participants. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: ERP findings showed that visual processing was modulated by both shape- and location-relevance per se, beginning separately at the latency of the early phase of a precocious negativity (60-80 ms) at mesial scalp sites consistent with the C1 component, and a positivity at more lateral sites. The data also showed that the attentional modulation progressed conjointly at the latency of the subsequent P1 (100-120 ms) and N1 (120-180 ms), as well as later-latency components. These findings support the views that (1) V1 may be precociously modulated by direct top-down influences, and participates to object, besides simple features, attentional selection; (2) object spatial and non-spatial features selection might begin with an early, parallel detection of a target object in the visual field, followed by the progressive focusing of spatial attention onto the location of an actual target for its identification, somehow in line with neural mechanisms reported in the literature as "object-based space selection", or with those proposed for visual search.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3355026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33550262012-05-18 Is that a belt or a snake? object attentional selection affects the early stages of visual sensory processing Zani, Alberto Proverbio, Alice M Behav Brain Funct Research BACKGROUND: There is at present crescent empirical evidence deriving from different lines of ERPs research that, unlike previously observed, the earliest sensory visual response, known as C1 component or P/N80, generated within the striate cortex, might be modulated by selective attention to visual stimulus features. Up to now, evidence of this modulation has been related to space location, and simple features such as spatial frequency, luminance, and texture. Additionally, neurophysiological conditions, such as emotion, vigilance, the reflexive or voluntary nature of input attentional selection, and workload have also been related to C1 modulations, although at least the workload status has received controversial indications. No information is instead available, at present, for objects attentional selection. METHODS: In this study object- and space-based attention mechanisms were conjointly investigated by presenting complex, familiar shapes of artefacts and animals, intermixed with distracters, in different tasks requiring the selection of a relevant target-category within a relevant spatial location, while ignoring the other shape categories within this location, and, overall, all the categories at an irrelevant location. EEG was recorded from 30 scalp electrode sites in 21 right-handed participants. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: ERP findings showed that visual processing was modulated by both shape- and location-relevance per se, beginning separately at the latency of the early phase of a precocious negativity (60-80 ms) at mesial scalp sites consistent with the C1 component, and a positivity at more lateral sites. The data also showed that the attentional modulation progressed conjointly at the latency of the subsequent P1 (100-120 ms) and N1 (120-180 ms), as well as later-latency components. These findings support the views that (1) V1 may be precociously modulated by direct top-down influences, and participates to object, besides simple features, attentional selection; (2) object spatial and non-spatial features selection might begin with an early, parallel detection of a target object in the visual field, followed by the progressive focusing of spatial attention onto the location of an actual target for its identification, somehow in line with neural mechanisms reported in the literature as "object-based space selection", or with those proposed for visual search. BioMed Central 2012-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3355026/ /pubmed/22300540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-8-6 Text en Copyright ©2012 Zani and Proverbio; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Zani, Alberto
Proverbio, Alice M
Is that a belt or a snake? object attentional selection affects the early stages of visual sensory processing
title Is that a belt or a snake? object attentional selection affects the early stages of visual sensory processing
title_full Is that a belt or a snake? object attentional selection affects the early stages of visual sensory processing
title_fullStr Is that a belt or a snake? object attentional selection affects the early stages of visual sensory processing
title_full_unstemmed Is that a belt or a snake? object attentional selection affects the early stages of visual sensory processing
title_short Is that a belt or a snake? object attentional selection affects the early stages of visual sensory processing
title_sort is that a belt or a snake? object attentional selection affects the early stages of visual sensory processing
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3355026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22300540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-8-6
work_keys_str_mv AT zanialberto isthatabeltorasnakeobjectattentionalselectionaffectstheearlystagesofvisualsensoryprocessing
AT proverbioalicem isthatabeltorasnakeobjectattentionalselectionaffectstheearlystagesofvisualsensoryprocessing