Cargando…
What we say and what we do: The relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices
Moral ideals are strongly ingrained within society and individuals alike, but actual moral choices are profoundly influenced by tangible rewards and consequences. Across two studies we show that real moral decisions can dramatically contradict moral choices made in hypothetical scenarios (Study 1)....
Autores principales: | FeldmanHall, Oriel, Mobbs, Dean, Evans, Davy, Hiscox, Lucy, Navrady, Lauren, Dalgleish, Tim |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3355304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22405924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.02.001 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Moral Chivalry: Gender and Harm Sensitivity Predict Costly Altruism
por: FeldmanHall, Oriel, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Differential neural circuitry and self-interest in real vs
hypothetical moral decisions
por: FeldmanHall, Oriel, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Deconstructing the brain’s moral network: dissociable functionality between the temporoparietal junction and ventro-medial prefrontal cortex
por: FeldmanHall, Oriel, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Empathic concern drives costly altruism
por: FeldmanHall, Oriel, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Why we don’t always punish: Preferences for non-punitive responses to moral violations
por: Heffner, Joseph, et al.
Publicado: (2019)