Cargando…
Results of low threshold to biopsy following high-intensity focused ultrasound for localized prostate cancer
CONTEXT: There are different treatment options for localized prostate cancer. The success of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is based largely on biochemical prostate specific antigen (PSA) results. AIMS: To evaluate the impact of using a low PSA threshold to perform prostate biopsies after...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3355706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22629002 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.95551 |
Sumario: | CONTEXT: There are different treatment options for localized prostate cancer. The success of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is based largely on biochemical prostate specific antigen (PSA) results. AIMS: To evaluate the impact of using a low PSA threshold to perform prostate biopsies after HIFU in order to more accurately gauge treatment success. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Eleven patients underwent HIFU at Sydney Adventist Hospital in Sydney, 10 as primary and 1 as salvage therapy [post external beam radiation therapy (EBRT)]. The median age was 67 years (49–77 years). This was a prospective case series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2006 and 2008, the Sonoblate device was used. Prostate biopsies were 12-core biopsies performed under local anesthesia, if PSA was ≥0.5 ng/mL or after two consecutive rises in PSA. The statistical analysis involved prospective data collection of results to calculate median and ranges. RESULTS: The median PSA at diagnosis was 6.7 ng/mL (5.7–10.8 ng/mL). The median follow-up was 16 months (7–26 months). Nine men (82%) had post-HIFU biopsy. The median time to post-HIFU biopsy was 11.6 months (5–20 months), and all nine men had biopsy-proven residual disease. CONCLUSIONS: A low threshold to re-biopsy post-HIFU reveals a high local failure rate of 82%. Oncological efficacy is questioned, and using high threshold to biopsy may therefore be overestimating the effectiveness of HIFU as a primary treatment for localized prostate cancer. |
---|