Cargando…

Variability in the Heritability of Body Mass Index: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression

Evidence for a major role of genetic factors in the determination of body mass index (BMI) comes from studies of related individuals. Despite consistent evidence for a heritable component of BMI, estimates of BMI heritability vary widely between studies and the reasons for this remain unclear. While...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elks, Cathy E., den Hoed, Marcel, Zhao, Jing Hua, Sharp, Stephen J., Wareham, Nicholas J., Loos, Ruth J. F., Ong, Ken K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3355836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22645519
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2012.00029
_version_ 1782233442441756672
author Elks, Cathy E.
den Hoed, Marcel
Zhao, Jing Hua
Sharp, Stephen J.
Wareham, Nicholas J.
Loos, Ruth J. F.
Ong, Ken K.
author_facet Elks, Cathy E.
den Hoed, Marcel
Zhao, Jing Hua
Sharp, Stephen J.
Wareham, Nicholas J.
Loos, Ruth J. F.
Ong, Ken K.
author_sort Elks, Cathy E.
collection PubMed
description Evidence for a major role of genetic factors in the determination of body mass index (BMI) comes from studies of related individuals. Despite consistent evidence for a heritable component of BMI, estimates of BMI heritability vary widely between studies and the reasons for this remain unclear. While some variation is natural due to differences between populations and settings, study design factors may also explain some of the heterogeneity. We performed a systematic review that identified 88 independent estimates of BMI heritability from twin studies (total 140,525 twins) and 27 estimates from family studies (42,968 family members). BMI heritability estimates from twin studies ranged from 0.47 to 0.90 (5th/50th/95th centiles: 0.58/0.75/0.87) and were generally higher than those from family studies (range: 0.24–0.81; 5th/50th/95th centiles: 0.25/0.46/0.68). Meta-regression of the results from twin studies showed that BMI heritability estimates were 0.07 (P = 0.001) higher in children than in adults; estimates increased with mean age among childhood studies (+0.012/year, P = 0.002), but decreased with mean age in adult studies (−0.002/year, P = 0.002). Heritability estimates derived from AE twin models (which assume no contribution of shared environment) were 0.12 higher than those from ACE models (P < 0.001), whilst lower estimates were associated with self reported versus DNA-based determination of zygosity (−0.04, P = 0.02), and with self reported versus measured BMI (−0.05, P = 0.03). Although the observed differences in heritability according to aspects of study design are relatively small, together, the above factors explained 47% of the heterogeneity in estimates of BMI heritability from twin studies. In summary, while some variation in BMI heritability is expected due to population-level differences, study design factors explained nearly half the heterogeneity reported in twin studies. The genetic contribution to BMI appears to vary with age and may have a greater influence during childhood than adult life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3355836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33558362012-05-29 Variability in the Heritability of Body Mass Index: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Elks, Cathy E. den Hoed, Marcel Zhao, Jing Hua Sharp, Stephen J. Wareham, Nicholas J. Loos, Ruth J. F. Ong, Ken K. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology Evidence for a major role of genetic factors in the determination of body mass index (BMI) comes from studies of related individuals. Despite consistent evidence for a heritable component of BMI, estimates of BMI heritability vary widely between studies and the reasons for this remain unclear. While some variation is natural due to differences between populations and settings, study design factors may also explain some of the heterogeneity. We performed a systematic review that identified 88 independent estimates of BMI heritability from twin studies (total 140,525 twins) and 27 estimates from family studies (42,968 family members). BMI heritability estimates from twin studies ranged from 0.47 to 0.90 (5th/50th/95th centiles: 0.58/0.75/0.87) and were generally higher than those from family studies (range: 0.24–0.81; 5th/50th/95th centiles: 0.25/0.46/0.68). Meta-regression of the results from twin studies showed that BMI heritability estimates were 0.07 (P = 0.001) higher in children than in adults; estimates increased with mean age among childhood studies (+0.012/year, P = 0.002), but decreased with mean age in adult studies (−0.002/year, P = 0.002). Heritability estimates derived from AE twin models (which assume no contribution of shared environment) were 0.12 higher than those from ACE models (P < 0.001), whilst lower estimates were associated with self reported versus DNA-based determination of zygosity (−0.04, P = 0.02), and with self reported versus measured BMI (−0.05, P = 0.03). Although the observed differences in heritability according to aspects of study design are relatively small, together, the above factors explained 47% of the heterogeneity in estimates of BMI heritability from twin studies. In summary, while some variation in BMI heritability is expected due to population-level differences, study design factors explained nearly half the heterogeneity reported in twin studies. The genetic contribution to BMI appears to vary with age and may have a greater influence during childhood than adult life. Frontiers Research Foundation 2012-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3355836/ /pubmed/22645519 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2012.00029 Text en Copyright © 2012 Elks, den Hoed, Zhao, Sharp, Wareham, Loos and Ong. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Elks, Cathy E.
den Hoed, Marcel
Zhao, Jing Hua
Sharp, Stephen J.
Wareham, Nicholas J.
Loos, Ruth J. F.
Ong, Ken K.
Variability in the Heritability of Body Mass Index: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression
title Variability in the Heritability of Body Mass Index: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression
title_full Variability in the Heritability of Body Mass Index: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression
title_fullStr Variability in the Heritability of Body Mass Index: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression
title_full_unstemmed Variability in the Heritability of Body Mass Index: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression
title_short Variability in the Heritability of Body Mass Index: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression
title_sort variability in the heritability of body mass index: a systematic review and meta-regression
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3355836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22645519
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2012.00029
work_keys_str_mv AT elkscathye variabilityintheheritabilityofbodymassindexasystematicreviewandmetaregression
AT denhoedmarcel variabilityintheheritabilityofbodymassindexasystematicreviewandmetaregression
AT zhaojinghua variabilityintheheritabilityofbodymassindexasystematicreviewandmetaregression
AT sharpstephenj variabilityintheheritabilityofbodymassindexasystematicreviewandmetaregression
AT warehamnicholasj variabilityintheheritabilityofbodymassindexasystematicreviewandmetaregression
AT loosruthjf variabilityintheheritabilityofbodymassindexasystematicreviewandmetaregression
AT ongkenk variabilityintheheritabilityofbodymassindexasystematicreviewandmetaregression