Cargando…

Comparing Aerodynamic Efficiency in Birds and Bats Suggests Better Flight Performance in Birds

Flight is one of the energetically most costly activities in the animal kingdom, suggesting that natural selection should work to optimize flight performance. The similar size and flight speed of birds and bats may therefore suggest convergent aerodynamic performance; alternatively, flight performan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muijres, Florian T., Johansson, L. Christoffer, Bowlin, Melissa S., Winter, York, Hedenström, Anders
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3356262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22624018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037335
_version_ 1782233532492414976
author Muijres, Florian T.
Johansson, L. Christoffer
Bowlin, Melissa S.
Winter, York
Hedenström, Anders
author_facet Muijres, Florian T.
Johansson, L. Christoffer
Bowlin, Melissa S.
Winter, York
Hedenström, Anders
author_sort Muijres, Florian T.
collection PubMed
description Flight is one of the energetically most costly activities in the animal kingdom, suggesting that natural selection should work to optimize flight performance. The similar size and flight speed of birds and bats may therefore suggest convergent aerodynamic performance; alternatively, flight performance could be restricted by phylogenetic constraints. We test which of these scenarios fit to two measures of aerodynamic flight efficiency in two passerine bird species and two New World leaf-nosed bat species. Using time-resolved particle image velocimetry measurements of the wake of the animals flying in a wind tunnel, we derived the span efficiency, a metric for the efficiency of generating lift, and the lift-to-drag ratio, a metric for mechanical energetic flight efficiency. We show that the birds significantly outperform the bats in both metrics, which we ascribe to variation in aerodynamic function of body and wing upstroke: Bird bodies generated relatively more lift than bat bodies, resulting in a more uniform spanwise lift distribution and higher span efficiency. A likely explanation would be that the bat ears and nose leaf, associated with echolocation, disturb the flow over the body. During the upstroke, the birds retract their wings to make them aerodynamically inactive, while the membranous bat wings generate thrust and negative lift. Despite the differences in performance, the wake morphology of both birds and bats resemble the optimal wake for their respective lift-to-drag ratio regimes. This suggests that evolution has optimized performance relative to the respective conditions of birds and bats, but that maximum performance is possibly limited by phylogenetic constraints. Although ecological differences between birds and bats are subjected to many conspiring variables, the different aerodynamic flight efficiency for the bird and bat species studied here may help explain why birds typically fly faster, migrate more frequently and migrate longer distances than bats.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3356262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33562622012-05-23 Comparing Aerodynamic Efficiency in Birds and Bats Suggests Better Flight Performance in Birds Muijres, Florian T. Johansson, L. Christoffer Bowlin, Melissa S. Winter, York Hedenström, Anders PLoS One Research Article Flight is one of the energetically most costly activities in the animal kingdom, suggesting that natural selection should work to optimize flight performance. The similar size and flight speed of birds and bats may therefore suggest convergent aerodynamic performance; alternatively, flight performance could be restricted by phylogenetic constraints. We test which of these scenarios fit to two measures of aerodynamic flight efficiency in two passerine bird species and two New World leaf-nosed bat species. Using time-resolved particle image velocimetry measurements of the wake of the animals flying in a wind tunnel, we derived the span efficiency, a metric for the efficiency of generating lift, and the lift-to-drag ratio, a metric for mechanical energetic flight efficiency. We show that the birds significantly outperform the bats in both metrics, which we ascribe to variation in aerodynamic function of body and wing upstroke: Bird bodies generated relatively more lift than bat bodies, resulting in a more uniform spanwise lift distribution and higher span efficiency. A likely explanation would be that the bat ears and nose leaf, associated with echolocation, disturb the flow over the body. During the upstroke, the birds retract their wings to make them aerodynamically inactive, while the membranous bat wings generate thrust and negative lift. Despite the differences in performance, the wake morphology of both birds and bats resemble the optimal wake for their respective lift-to-drag ratio regimes. This suggests that evolution has optimized performance relative to the respective conditions of birds and bats, but that maximum performance is possibly limited by phylogenetic constraints. Although ecological differences between birds and bats are subjected to many conspiring variables, the different aerodynamic flight efficiency for the bird and bat species studied here may help explain why birds typically fly faster, migrate more frequently and migrate longer distances than bats. Public Library of Science 2012-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3356262/ /pubmed/22624018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037335 Text en Muijres et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Muijres, Florian T.
Johansson, L. Christoffer
Bowlin, Melissa S.
Winter, York
Hedenström, Anders
Comparing Aerodynamic Efficiency in Birds and Bats Suggests Better Flight Performance in Birds
title Comparing Aerodynamic Efficiency in Birds and Bats Suggests Better Flight Performance in Birds
title_full Comparing Aerodynamic Efficiency in Birds and Bats Suggests Better Flight Performance in Birds
title_fullStr Comparing Aerodynamic Efficiency in Birds and Bats Suggests Better Flight Performance in Birds
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Aerodynamic Efficiency in Birds and Bats Suggests Better Flight Performance in Birds
title_short Comparing Aerodynamic Efficiency in Birds and Bats Suggests Better Flight Performance in Birds
title_sort comparing aerodynamic efficiency in birds and bats suggests better flight performance in birds
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3356262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22624018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037335
work_keys_str_mv AT muijresfloriant comparingaerodynamicefficiencyinbirdsandbatssuggestsbetterflightperformanceinbirds
AT johanssonlchristoffer comparingaerodynamicefficiencyinbirdsandbatssuggestsbetterflightperformanceinbirds
AT bowlinmelissas comparingaerodynamicefficiencyinbirdsandbatssuggestsbetterflightperformanceinbirds
AT winteryork comparingaerodynamicefficiencyinbirdsandbatssuggestsbetterflightperformanceinbirds
AT hedenstromanders comparingaerodynamicefficiencyinbirdsandbatssuggestsbetterflightperformanceinbirds