Cargando…

Is the Measurement of Accessory Pathway Refractory Period Reproducible?

INTRODUCTION: Short accessory pathway (AP) effective refractory period (ERP) is one of the risk factors in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (WPW). The purpose of study was to evaluate the reproducibility of APERP measurement during a same electrophysiological study (EPS). METHODS: EPS consisted of 2 A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oliver, Celine, Brembilla-Perrot, Beatrice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Indian Heart Rhythm Society 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3356589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22665958
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Short accessory pathway (AP) effective refractory period (ERP) is one of the risk factors in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (WPW). The purpose of study was to evaluate the reproducibility of APERP measurement during a same electrophysiological study (EPS). METHODS: EPS consisted of 2 APERP measurements performed prospectively in 77 patients for a WPW in control state (CS) at a cycle length of 400 ms (n=76) and after isoproterenol (n=56). RESULTS: In CS, 18 patients (24 %) had the same APERP at both measurements; 41 (54.6 %) had differences from 10 to 40 ms, 17 (22.4 %) had differences > 40 ms. Among 45 patients with initial APERP > 240 ms, 7 had an APERP ≤ 240 ms at 2nd study. Among 31 patients with initial APERP ≤ 240 ms, 5 had an APERP > 240 ms at 2nd study. Pearson's product-moment correlation was 0.75. After isoproterenol, 5 patients (9 %) had the same APERPs; 37 (66 %) had differences from 10 to 40 ms and 14 had differences > 40 ms. Among 38 patients with initial APERP > 200 ms, 12 had an AP ERP ≤ 200 ms at 2nd study. Among 18 patients with initial APERP ≤ 200 ms, 10 had still APERP ≤ 200 ms at 2nd study. Pearson's product-moment correlation was 0.54. CONCLUSION: There are important variations of APERPs during EPS mainly after isoproterenol infusion. Therefore the values of APERPs should be interpreted cautiously.