Cargando…

Is the Measurement of Accessory Pathway Refractory Period Reproducible?

INTRODUCTION: Short accessory pathway (AP) effective refractory period (ERP) is one of the risk factors in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (WPW). The purpose of study was to evaluate the reproducibility of APERP measurement during a same electrophysiological study (EPS). METHODS: EPS consisted of 2 A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oliver, Celine, Brembilla-Perrot, Beatrice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Indian Heart Rhythm Society 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3356589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22665958
_version_ 1782233572313137152
author Oliver, Celine
Brembilla-Perrot, Beatrice
author_facet Oliver, Celine
Brembilla-Perrot, Beatrice
author_sort Oliver, Celine
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Short accessory pathway (AP) effective refractory period (ERP) is one of the risk factors in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (WPW). The purpose of study was to evaluate the reproducibility of APERP measurement during a same electrophysiological study (EPS). METHODS: EPS consisted of 2 APERP measurements performed prospectively in 77 patients for a WPW in control state (CS) at a cycle length of 400 ms (n=76) and after isoproterenol (n=56). RESULTS: In CS, 18 patients (24 %) had the same APERP at both measurements; 41 (54.6 %) had differences from 10 to 40 ms, 17 (22.4 %) had differences > 40 ms. Among 45 patients with initial APERP > 240 ms, 7 had an APERP ≤ 240 ms at 2nd study. Among 31 patients with initial APERP ≤ 240 ms, 5 had an APERP > 240 ms at 2nd study. Pearson's product-moment correlation was 0.75. After isoproterenol, 5 patients (9 %) had the same APERPs; 37 (66 %) had differences from 10 to 40 ms and 14 had differences > 40 ms. Among 38 patients with initial APERP > 200 ms, 12 had an AP ERP ≤ 200 ms at 2nd study. Among 18 patients with initial APERP ≤ 200 ms, 10 had still APERP ≤ 200 ms at 2nd study. Pearson's product-moment correlation was 0.54. CONCLUSION: There are important variations of APERPs during EPS mainly after isoproterenol infusion. Therefore the values of APERPs should be interpreted cautiously.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3356589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Indian Heart Rhythm Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33565892012-06-04 Is the Measurement of Accessory Pathway Refractory Period Reproducible? Oliver, Celine Brembilla-Perrot, Beatrice Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J Original Article INTRODUCTION: Short accessory pathway (AP) effective refractory period (ERP) is one of the risk factors in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (WPW). The purpose of study was to evaluate the reproducibility of APERP measurement during a same electrophysiological study (EPS). METHODS: EPS consisted of 2 APERP measurements performed prospectively in 77 patients for a WPW in control state (CS) at a cycle length of 400 ms (n=76) and after isoproterenol (n=56). RESULTS: In CS, 18 patients (24 %) had the same APERP at both measurements; 41 (54.6 %) had differences from 10 to 40 ms, 17 (22.4 %) had differences > 40 ms. Among 45 patients with initial APERP > 240 ms, 7 had an APERP ≤ 240 ms at 2nd study. Among 31 patients with initial APERP ≤ 240 ms, 5 had an APERP > 240 ms at 2nd study. Pearson's product-moment correlation was 0.75. After isoproterenol, 5 patients (9 %) had the same APERPs; 37 (66 %) had differences from 10 to 40 ms and 14 had differences > 40 ms. Among 38 patients with initial APERP > 200 ms, 12 had an AP ERP ≤ 200 ms at 2nd study. Among 18 patients with initial APERP ≤ 200 ms, 10 had still APERP ≤ 200 ms at 2nd study. Pearson's product-moment correlation was 0.54. CONCLUSION: There are important variations of APERPs during EPS mainly after isoproterenol infusion. Therefore the values of APERPs should be interpreted cautiously. Indian Heart Rhythm Society 2012-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3356589/ /pubmed/22665958 Text en Copyright: © 2012 Oliver et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Oliver, Celine
Brembilla-Perrot, Beatrice
Is the Measurement of Accessory Pathway Refractory Period Reproducible?
title Is the Measurement of Accessory Pathway Refractory Period Reproducible?
title_full Is the Measurement of Accessory Pathway Refractory Period Reproducible?
title_fullStr Is the Measurement of Accessory Pathway Refractory Period Reproducible?
title_full_unstemmed Is the Measurement of Accessory Pathway Refractory Period Reproducible?
title_short Is the Measurement of Accessory Pathway Refractory Period Reproducible?
title_sort is the measurement of accessory pathway refractory period reproducible?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3356589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22665958
work_keys_str_mv AT oliverceline isthemeasurementofaccessorypathwayrefractoryperiodreproducible
AT brembillaperrotbeatrice isthemeasurementofaccessorypathwayrefractoryperiodreproducible