Cargando…
Is the Measurement of Accessory Pathway Refractory Period Reproducible?
INTRODUCTION: Short accessory pathway (AP) effective refractory period (ERP) is one of the risk factors in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (WPW). The purpose of study was to evaluate the reproducibility of APERP measurement during a same electrophysiological study (EPS). METHODS: EPS consisted of 2 A...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Indian Heart Rhythm Society
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3356589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22665958 |
_version_ | 1782233572313137152 |
---|---|
author | Oliver, Celine Brembilla-Perrot, Beatrice |
author_facet | Oliver, Celine Brembilla-Perrot, Beatrice |
author_sort | Oliver, Celine |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Short accessory pathway (AP) effective refractory period (ERP) is one of the risk factors in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (WPW). The purpose of study was to evaluate the reproducibility of APERP measurement during a same electrophysiological study (EPS). METHODS: EPS consisted of 2 APERP measurements performed prospectively in 77 patients for a WPW in control state (CS) at a cycle length of 400 ms (n=76) and after isoproterenol (n=56). RESULTS: In CS, 18 patients (24 %) had the same APERP at both measurements; 41 (54.6 %) had differences from 10 to 40 ms, 17 (22.4 %) had differences > 40 ms. Among 45 patients with initial APERP > 240 ms, 7 had an APERP ≤ 240 ms at 2nd study. Among 31 patients with initial APERP ≤ 240 ms, 5 had an APERP > 240 ms at 2nd study. Pearson's product-moment correlation was 0.75. After isoproterenol, 5 patients (9 %) had the same APERPs; 37 (66 %) had differences from 10 to 40 ms and 14 had differences > 40 ms. Among 38 patients with initial APERP > 200 ms, 12 had an AP ERP ≤ 200 ms at 2nd study. Among 18 patients with initial APERP ≤ 200 ms, 10 had still APERP ≤ 200 ms at 2nd study. Pearson's product-moment correlation was 0.54. CONCLUSION: There are important variations of APERPs during EPS mainly after isoproterenol infusion. Therefore the values of APERPs should be interpreted cautiously. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3356589 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Indian Heart Rhythm Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33565892012-06-04 Is the Measurement of Accessory Pathway Refractory Period Reproducible? Oliver, Celine Brembilla-Perrot, Beatrice Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J Original Article INTRODUCTION: Short accessory pathway (AP) effective refractory period (ERP) is one of the risk factors in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (WPW). The purpose of study was to evaluate the reproducibility of APERP measurement during a same electrophysiological study (EPS). METHODS: EPS consisted of 2 APERP measurements performed prospectively in 77 patients for a WPW in control state (CS) at a cycle length of 400 ms (n=76) and after isoproterenol (n=56). RESULTS: In CS, 18 patients (24 %) had the same APERP at both measurements; 41 (54.6 %) had differences from 10 to 40 ms, 17 (22.4 %) had differences > 40 ms. Among 45 patients with initial APERP > 240 ms, 7 had an APERP ≤ 240 ms at 2nd study. Among 31 patients with initial APERP ≤ 240 ms, 5 had an APERP > 240 ms at 2nd study. Pearson's product-moment correlation was 0.75. After isoproterenol, 5 patients (9 %) had the same APERPs; 37 (66 %) had differences from 10 to 40 ms and 14 had differences > 40 ms. Among 38 patients with initial APERP > 200 ms, 12 had an AP ERP ≤ 200 ms at 2nd study. Among 18 patients with initial APERP ≤ 200 ms, 10 had still APERP ≤ 200 ms at 2nd study. Pearson's product-moment correlation was 0.54. CONCLUSION: There are important variations of APERPs during EPS mainly after isoproterenol infusion. Therefore the values of APERPs should be interpreted cautiously. Indian Heart Rhythm Society 2012-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3356589/ /pubmed/22665958 Text en Copyright: © 2012 Oliver et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Oliver, Celine Brembilla-Perrot, Beatrice Is the Measurement of Accessory Pathway Refractory Period Reproducible? |
title | Is the Measurement of Accessory Pathway Refractory Period Reproducible? |
title_full | Is the Measurement of Accessory Pathway Refractory Period Reproducible? |
title_fullStr | Is the Measurement of Accessory Pathway Refractory Period Reproducible? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is the Measurement of Accessory Pathway Refractory Period Reproducible? |
title_short | Is the Measurement of Accessory Pathway Refractory Period Reproducible? |
title_sort | is the measurement of accessory pathway refractory period reproducible? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3356589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22665958 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oliverceline isthemeasurementofaccessorypathwayrefractoryperiodreproducible AT brembillaperrotbeatrice isthemeasurementofaccessorypathwayrefractoryperiodreproducible |