Cargando…

Ultra-morphology of root surface subsequent to periodontal instrumentation: A scanning electron microscope study

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare root surface characteristic following root planing with various hand and power driven instruments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 single rooted teeth were used in this study, of which two specimens were used as control (no instrumentation done)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dahiya, Parveen, Kamal, Reet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3357043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22628971
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.94613
_version_ 1782233630566776832
author Dahiya, Parveen
Kamal, Reet
author_facet Dahiya, Parveen
Kamal, Reet
author_sort Dahiya, Parveen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare root surface characteristic following root planing with various hand and power driven instruments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 single rooted teeth were used in this study, of which two specimens were used as control (no instrumentation done) and remaining 18 specimens were equally divided into three groups. Specimens from each group were then subjected to root planing by one of the following instruments: (1) a Gracey curette (2) Ultrasonic tip and (3) a Rotary bur. In each case, the time required for scaling and root planing was measured. After treatment, the specimens were observed under scanning electron microscope and surface roughness was measured by using Roughness and loss of tooth substance index (RLTSI). RESULTS: The mean RLTSI scores for Gracey curette, ultrasonic and rotary instrument group were 2.5, 2.0 and 0.667 respectively. The mean scores of time spent for scaling and root planing by Gracey curette, ultrasonic and rotary instrument group in seconds were 42.50, 35.83 and 54.50. CONCLUSION: All the three instruments namely Gracey curette, Ultrasonic tip and Rotary bur were effective in mechanical debridement of root surface. The results favoured the use of rotary instruments for root planing to achieve smooth clean root surface; however, the use of rotary instrument was more time consuming which might limit its use in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3357043
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33570432012-05-24 Ultra-morphology of root surface subsequent to periodontal instrumentation: A scanning electron microscope study Dahiya, Parveen Kamal, Reet J Indian Soc Periodontol Original Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare root surface characteristic following root planing with various hand and power driven instruments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 single rooted teeth were used in this study, of which two specimens were used as control (no instrumentation done) and remaining 18 specimens were equally divided into three groups. Specimens from each group were then subjected to root planing by one of the following instruments: (1) a Gracey curette (2) Ultrasonic tip and (3) a Rotary bur. In each case, the time required for scaling and root planing was measured. After treatment, the specimens were observed under scanning electron microscope and surface roughness was measured by using Roughness and loss of tooth substance index (RLTSI). RESULTS: The mean RLTSI scores for Gracey curette, ultrasonic and rotary instrument group were 2.5, 2.0 and 0.667 respectively. The mean scores of time spent for scaling and root planing by Gracey curette, ultrasonic and rotary instrument group in seconds were 42.50, 35.83 and 54.50. CONCLUSION: All the three instruments namely Gracey curette, Ultrasonic tip and Rotary bur were effective in mechanical debridement of root surface. The results favoured the use of rotary instruments for root planing to achieve smooth clean root surface; however, the use of rotary instrument was more time consuming which might limit its use in clinical practice. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3357043/ /pubmed/22628971 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.94613 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Dahiya, Parveen
Kamal, Reet
Ultra-morphology of root surface subsequent to periodontal instrumentation: A scanning electron microscope study
title Ultra-morphology of root surface subsequent to periodontal instrumentation: A scanning electron microscope study
title_full Ultra-morphology of root surface subsequent to periodontal instrumentation: A scanning electron microscope study
title_fullStr Ultra-morphology of root surface subsequent to periodontal instrumentation: A scanning electron microscope study
title_full_unstemmed Ultra-morphology of root surface subsequent to periodontal instrumentation: A scanning electron microscope study
title_short Ultra-morphology of root surface subsequent to periodontal instrumentation: A scanning electron microscope study
title_sort ultra-morphology of root surface subsequent to periodontal instrumentation: a scanning electron microscope study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3357043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22628971
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.94613
work_keys_str_mv AT dahiyaparveen ultramorphologyofrootsurfacesubsequenttoperiodontalinstrumentationascanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT kamalreet ultramorphologyofrootsurfacesubsequenttoperiodontalinstrumentationascanningelectronmicroscopestudy