Cargando…
Aggregating post-publication peer reviews and ratings
Allocating funding for research often entails the review of the publications authored by a scientist or a group of scientists. For practical reasons, in many cases this review cannot be performed by a sufficient number of specialists in the core domain of the reviewed publications. In the meanwhile,...
Autor principal: | Florian, Răzvan V. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3357530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22661941 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00031 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Open Evaluation: A Vision for Entirely Transparent Post-Publication Peer Review and Rating for Science
por: Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus
Publicado: (2012) -
Post-Publication Peer Review: Opening Up Scientific Conversation
por: Hunter, Jane
Publicado: (2012) -
The need for post-publication peer review in plant science publishing
por: Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A.
Publicado: (2013) -
Publication Rates of Public Health Theses in International and National Peer-Review Journals in Turkey
por: Sipahi, H, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Emerging trends in peer review—a survey
por: Walker, Richard, et al.
Publicado: (2015)