Cargando…

The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Allied Health Professionals today are required, more than ever before, to demonstrate their impact. However, despite at least 20 years of expectation, many services fail to deliver routine outcome measurement in practice. This systematic review investigates what helps and hinders routine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duncan, Edward AS, Murray, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3358245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22506982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-96
_version_ 1782233757852368896
author Duncan, Edward AS
Murray, Jennifer
author_facet Duncan, Edward AS
Murray, Jennifer
author_sort Duncan, Edward AS
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Allied Health Professionals today are required, more than ever before, to demonstrate their impact. However, despite at least 20 years of expectation, many services fail to deliver routine outcome measurement in practice. This systematic review investigates what helps and hinders routine outcome measurement of allied health professionals practice. METHODS: A systematic review protocol was developed comprising: a defined search strategy for PsycINFO, MEDLINE and CINHAL databases and inclusion criteria and systematic procedures for data extraction and quality appraisal. Studies were included if they were published in English and investigated facilitators and/or barriers to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals. No restrictions were placed on publication type, design, country, or year of publication. Reference lists of included publications were searched to identify additional papers. Descriptive methods were used to synthesise the findings. RESULTS: 960 papers were retrieved; 15 met the inclusion criteria. Professional groups represented were Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy, and Speech and Language Therapy. The included literature varied in quality and design. Facilitators and barriers to routine outcome measurement exist at individual, managerial and organisational levels. Key factors affecting professionals’ use of routine outcome measurement include: professionals’ level of knowledge and confidence about using outcome measures, and the degree of organisational and peer-support professionals received with a view to promoting their work in practice. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst the importance of routinely measuring outcomes within the allied health professions is well recognised, it has largely failed to be delivered in practice. Factors that influence clinicians’ ability and desire to undertake routine outcome measurement are bi-directional: they can act as either facilitators or barriers. Routine outcome measurement may only be deliverable if appropriate action is taken at individual therapist, team, and organisational levels of an organisation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3358245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33582452012-05-23 The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review Duncan, Edward AS Murray, Jennifer BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Allied Health Professionals today are required, more than ever before, to demonstrate their impact. However, despite at least 20 years of expectation, many services fail to deliver routine outcome measurement in practice. This systematic review investigates what helps and hinders routine outcome measurement of allied health professionals practice. METHODS: A systematic review protocol was developed comprising: a defined search strategy for PsycINFO, MEDLINE and CINHAL databases and inclusion criteria and systematic procedures for data extraction and quality appraisal. Studies were included if they were published in English and investigated facilitators and/or barriers to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals. No restrictions were placed on publication type, design, country, or year of publication. Reference lists of included publications were searched to identify additional papers. Descriptive methods were used to synthesise the findings. RESULTS: 960 papers were retrieved; 15 met the inclusion criteria. Professional groups represented were Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy, and Speech and Language Therapy. The included literature varied in quality and design. Facilitators and barriers to routine outcome measurement exist at individual, managerial and organisational levels. Key factors affecting professionals’ use of routine outcome measurement include: professionals’ level of knowledge and confidence about using outcome measures, and the degree of organisational and peer-support professionals received with a view to promoting their work in practice. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst the importance of routinely measuring outcomes within the allied health professions is well recognised, it has largely failed to be delivered in practice. Factors that influence clinicians’ ability and desire to undertake routine outcome measurement are bi-directional: they can act as either facilitators or barriers. Routine outcome measurement may only be deliverable if appropriate action is taken at individual therapist, team, and organisational levels of an organisation. BioMed Central 2012-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3358245/ /pubmed/22506982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-96 Text en Copyright ©2012 Duncan and Murray; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Duncan, Edward AS
Murray, Jennifer
The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review
title The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review
title_full The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review
title_fullStr The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review
title_short The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review
title_sort barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3358245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22506982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-96
work_keys_str_mv AT duncanedwardas thebarriersandfacilitatorstoroutineoutcomemeasurementbyalliedhealthprofessionalsinpracticeasystematicreview
AT murrayjennifer thebarriersandfacilitatorstoroutineoutcomemeasurementbyalliedhealthprofessionalsinpracticeasystematicreview
AT duncanedwardas barriersandfacilitatorstoroutineoutcomemeasurementbyalliedhealthprofessionalsinpracticeasystematicreview
AT murrayjennifer barriersandfacilitatorstoroutineoutcomemeasurementbyalliedhealthprofessionalsinpracticeasystematicreview