Cargando…

Measurement of Ad Libitum Food Intake, Physical Activity, and Sedentary Time in Response to Overfeeding

Given the wide availability of highly palatable foods, overeating is common. Energy intake and metabolic responses to overfeeding may provide insights into weight gain prevention. We hypothesized a down-regulation in subsequent food intake and sedentary time, and up-regulation in non-exercise activi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Jianying, Votruba, Susanne, Pomeroy, Jeremy, Bonfiglio, Susan, Krakoff, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3358301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22629311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036225
_version_ 1782233770452058112
author He, Jianying
Votruba, Susanne
Pomeroy, Jeremy
Bonfiglio, Susan
Krakoff, Jonathan
author_facet He, Jianying
Votruba, Susanne
Pomeroy, Jeremy
Bonfiglio, Susan
Krakoff, Jonathan
author_sort He, Jianying
collection PubMed
description Given the wide availability of highly palatable foods, overeating is common. Energy intake and metabolic responses to overfeeding may provide insights into weight gain prevention. We hypothesized a down-regulation in subsequent food intake and sedentary time, and up-regulation in non-exercise activity and core temperature in response to overfeeding in order to maintain body weight constant. In a monitored inpatient clinical research unit using a cross over study design, we investigated ad libitum energy intake (EI, using automated vending machines), core body temperature, and physical activity (using accelerometry) following a short term (3-day) weight maintaining (WM) vs overfeeding (OF) diet in healthy volunteers (n = 21, BMI, mean ± SD, 33.2±8.6 kg/m(2), 73.6% male). During the ad libitum periods following the WM vs. OF diets, there was no significant difference in mean 3-d EI (4061±1084 vs. 3926±1284 kcal/day, p = 0.41), and there were also no differences either in core body temperature (37.0±0.2°C vs. 37.1±0.2°C, p = 0.75) or sedentary time (70.9±12.9 vs. 72.0±7.4%, p = 0.88). However, during OF (but not WM), sedentary time was positively associated with weight gain (r = 0.49, p = 0.05, adjusted for age, sex, and initial weight). In conclusion, short term overfeeding did not result in a decrease in subsequent ad libitum food intake or overall change in sedentary time although in secondary analysis sedentary time was associated with weight gain during OF. Beyond possible changes in sedentary time, there is minimal attempt to restore energy balance during or following short term overfeeding. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00342732
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3358301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33583012012-05-24 Measurement of Ad Libitum Food Intake, Physical Activity, and Sedentary Time in Response to Overfeeding He, Jianying Votruba, Susanne Pomeroy, Jeremy Bonfiglio, Susan Krakoff, Jonathan PLoS One Research Article Given the wide availability of highly palatable foods, overeating is common. Energy intake and metabolic responses to overfeeding may provide insights into weight gain prevention. We hypothesized a down-regulation in subsequent food intake and sedentary time, and up-regulation in non-exercise activity and core temperature in response to overfeeding in order to maintain body weight constant. In a monitored inpatient clinical research unit using a cross over study design, we investigated ad libitum energy intake (EI, using automated vending machines), core body temperature, and physical activity (using accelerometry) following a short term (3-day) weight maintaining (WM) vs overfeeding (OF) diet in healthy volunteers (n = 21, BMI, mean ± SD, 33.2±8.6 kg/m(2), 73.6% male). During the ad libitum periods following the WM vs. OF diets, there was no significant difference in mean 3-d EI (4061±1084 vs. 3926±1284 kcal/day, p = 0.41), and there were also no differences either in core body temperature (37.0±0.2°C vs. 37.1±0.2°C, p = 0.75) or sedentary time (70.9±12.9 vs. 72.0±7.4%, p = 0.88). However, during OF (but not WM), sedentary time was positively associated with weight gain (r = 0.49, p = 0.05, adjusted for age, sex, and initial weight). In conclusion, short term overfeeding did not result in a decrease in subsequent ad libitum food intake or overall change in sedentary time although in secondary analysis sedentary time was associated with weight gain during OF. Beyond possible changes in sedentary time, there is minimal attempt to restore energy balance during or following short term overfeeding. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00342732 Public Library of Science 2012-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3358301/ /pubmed/22629311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036225 Text en This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
He, Jianying
Votruba, Susanne
Pomeroy, Jeremy
Bonfiglio, Susan
Krakoff, Jonathan
Measurement of Ad Libitum Food Intake, Physical Activity, and Sedentary Time in Response to Overfeeding
title Measurement of Ad Libitum Food Intake, Physical Activity, and Sedentary Time in Response to Overfeeding
title_full Measurement of Ad Libitum Food Intake, Physical Activity, and Sedentary Time in Response to Overfeeding
title_fullStr Measurement of Ad Libitum Food Intake, Physical Activity, and Sedentary Time in Response to Overfeeding
title_full_unstemmed Measurement of Ad Libitum Food Intake, Physical Activity, and Sedentary Time in Response to Overfeeding
title_short Measurement of Ad Libitum Food Intake, Physical Activity, and Sedentary Time in Response to Overfeeding
title_sort measurement of ad libitum food intake, physical activity, and sedentary time in response to overfeeding
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3358301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22629311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036225
work_keys_str_mv AT hejianying measurementofadlibitumfoodintakephysicalactivityandsedentarytimeinresponsetooverfeeding
AT votrubasusanne measurementofadlibitumfoodintakephysicalactivityandsedentarytimeinresponsetooverfeeding
AT pomeroyjeremy measurementofadlibitumfoodintakephysicalactivityandsedentarytimeinresponsetooverfeeding
AT bonfigliosusan measurementofadlibitumfoodintakephysicalactivityandsedentarytimeinresponsetooverfeeding
AT krakoffjonathan measurementofadlibitumfoodintakephysicalactivityandsedentarytimeinresponsetooverfeeding