Cargando…
Extent of Structural Asymmetry in Homodimeric Proteins: Prevalence and Relevance
Most homodimeric proteins have symmetric structure. Although symmetry is known to confer structural and functional advantage, asymmetric organization is also observed. Using a non-redundant dataset of 223 high-resolution crystal structures of biologically relevant homodimers, we address questions on...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3358323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22629324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036688 |
_version_ | 1782233775326887936 |
---|---|
author | Swapna, Lakshmipuram Seshadri Srikeerthana, Kuchi Srinivasan, Narayanaswamy |
author_facet | Swapna, Lakshmipuram Seshadri Srikeerthana, Kuchi Srinivasan, Narayanaswamy |
author_sort | Swapna, Lakshmipuram Seshadri |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most homodimeric proteins have symmetric structure. Although symmetry is known to confer structural and functional advantage, asymmetric organization is also observed. Using a non-redundant dataset of 223 high-resolution crystal structures of biologically relevant homodimers, we address questions on the prevalence and significance of asymmetry. We used two measures to quantify global and interface asymmetry, and assess the correlation of several molecular and structural parameters with asymmetry. We have identified rare cases (11/223) of biologically relevant homodimers with pronounced global asymmetry. Asymmetry serves as a means to bring about 2∶1 binding between the homodimer and another molecule; it also enables cellular signalling arising from asymmetric macromolecular ligands such as DNA. Analysis of these cases reveals two possible mechanisms by which possible infinite array formation is prevented. In case of homodimers associating via non-topologically equivalent surfaces in their tertiary structures, ligand-dependent mechanisms are used. For stable dimers binding via large surfaces, ligand-dependent structural change regulates polymerisation/depolymerisation; for unstable dimers binding via smaller surfaces that are not evolutionarily well conserved, dimerisation occurs only in the presence of the ligand. In case of homodimers associating via interaction surfaces with parts of the surfaces topologically equivalent in the tertiary structures, steric hindrance serves as the preventive mechanism of infinite array. We also find that homodimers exhibiting grossly symmetric organization rarely exhibit either perfect local symmetry or high local asymmetry. Binding of small ligands at the interface does not cause any significant variation in interface asymmetry. However, identification of biologically relevant interface asymmetry in grossly symmetric homodimers is confounded by the presence of similar small magnitude changes caused due to artefacts of crystallisation. Our study provides new insights regarding accommodation of asymmetry in homodimers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3358323 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33583232012-05-24 Extent of Structural Asymmetry in Homodimeric Proteins: Prevalence and Relevance Swapna, Lakshmipuram Seshadri Srikeerthana, Kuchi Srinivasan, Narayanaswamy PLoS One Research Article Most homodimeric proteins have symmetric structure. Although symmetry is known to confer structural and functional advantage, asymmetric organization is also observed. Using a non-redundant dataset of 223 high-resolution crystal structures of biologically relevant homodimers, we address questions on the prevalence and significance of asymmetry. We used two measures to quantify global and interface asymmetry, and assess the correlation of several molecular and structural parameters with asymmetry. We have identified rare cases (11/223) of biologically relevant homodimers with pronounced global asymmetry. Asymmetry serves as a means to bring about 2∶1 binding between the homodimer and another molecule; it also enables cellular signalling arising from asymmetric macromolecular ligands such as DNA. Analysis of these cases reveals two possible mechanisms by which possible infinite array formation is prevented. In case of homodimers associating via non-topologically equivalent surfaces in their tertiary structures, ligand-dependent mechanisms are used. For stable dimers binding via large surfaces, ligand-dependent structural change regulates polymerisation/depolymerisation; for unstable dimers binding via smaller surfaces that are not evolutionarily well conserved, dimerisation occurs only in the presence of the ligand. In case of homodimers associating via interaction surfaces with parts of the surfaces topologically equivalent in the tertiary structures, steric hindrance serves as the preventive mechanism of infinite array. We also find that homodimers exhibiting grossly symmetric organization rarely exhibit either perfect local symmetry or high local asymmetry. Binding of small ligands at the interface does not cause any significant variation in interface asymmetry. However, identification of biologically relevant interface asymmetry in grossly symmetric homodimers is confounded by the presence of similar small magnitude changes caused due to artefacts of crystallisation. Our study provides new insights regarding accommodation of asymmetry in homodimers. Public Library of Science 2012-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3358323/ /pubmed/22629324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036688 Text en Swapna et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Swapna, Lakshmipuram Seshadri Srikeerthana, Kuchi Srinivasan, Narayanaswamy Extent of Structural Asymmetry in Homodimeric Proteins: Prevalence and Relevance |
title | Extent of Structural Asymmetry in Homodimeric Proteins: Prevalence and Relevance |
title_full | Extent of Structural Asymmetry in Homodimeric Proteins: Prevalence and Relevance |
title_fullStr | Extent of Structural Asymmetry in Homodimeric Proteins: Prevalence and Relevance |
title_full_unstemmed | Extent of Structural Asymmetry in Homodimeric Proteins: Prevalence and Relevance |
title_short | Extent of Structural Asymmetry in Homodimeric Proteins: Prevalence and Relevance |
title_sort | extent of structural asymmetry in homodimeric proteins: prevalence and relevance |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3358323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22629324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036688 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT swapnalakshmipuramseshadri extentofstructuralasymmetryinhomodimericproteinsprevalenceandrelevance AT srikeerthanakuchi extentofstructuralasymmetryinhomodimericproteinsprevalenceandrelevance AT srinivasannarayanaswamy extentofstructuralasymmetryinhomodimericproteinsprevalenceandrelevance |