Cargando…

Understanding public trust in services provided by community pharmacists relative to those provided by general practitioners: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVES: To apply sociological theories to understand public trust in extended services provided by community pharmacists relative to those provided by general practitioners (GPs). DESIGN: Qualitative study involving focus groups with members of the public. SETTING: The West of Scotland. PARTICIP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gidman, Wendy, Ward, Paul, McGregor, Lesley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3358628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22586286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000939
_version_ 1782233793481932800
author Gidman, Wendy
Ward, Paul
McGregor, Lesley
author_facet Gidman, Wendy
Ward, Paul
McGregor, Lesley
author_sort Gidman, Wendy
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To apply sociological theories to understand public trust in extended services provided by community pharmacists relative to those provided by general practitioners (GPs). DESIGN: Qualitative study involving focus groups with members of the public. SETTING: The West of Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: 26 purposively sampled members of the public were involved in one of five focus groups. The groups were composed to represent known groups of users and non-users of community pharmacy, namely mothers with young children, seniors and men. RESULTS: Trust was seen as being crucial in healthcare settings. Focus group discussions revealed that participants were inclined to draw unfavourable comparisons between pharmacists and GPs. Importantly, participants' trust in GPs was greater than that in pharmacists. Participants considered pharmacists to be primarily involved in medicine supply, and awareness of the pharmacist's extended role was low. Participants were often reluctant to trust pharmacists to deliver unfamiliar services, particularly those perceived to be ‘high risk’. Numerous system-based factors were identified, which reinforce patient trust and confidence in GPs, including GP registration and appointment systems, GPs' expert/gatekeeper role and practice environments. Our data indicate that the nature and context of public interactions with GPs fostered familiarity with a specific GP or practice, which allowed interpersonal trust to develop. By contrast, participants' exposure to community pharmacists was limited. Additionally, a good understanding of the GPs' level of training and role promoted confidence. CONCLUSION: Current UK initiatives, which aim to implement a range of pharmacist-led services, are undermined by lack of public trust. It seems improbable that the public will trust pharmacists to deliver unfamiliar services, which are perceived to be ‘high risk’, unless health systems change in a way that promotes trust in pharmacists. This may be achieved by increasing the quality and quantity of patient interactions with pharmacists and gaining GP support for extended pharmacy services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3358628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33586282012-05-31 Understanding public trust in services provided by community pharmacists relative to those provided by general practitioners: a qualitative study Gidman, Wendy Ward, Paul McGregor, Lesley BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: To apply sociological theories to understand public trust in extended services provided by community pharmacists relative to those provided by general practitioners (GPs). DESIGN: Qualitative study involving focus groups with members of the public. SETTING: The West of Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: 26 purposively sampled members of the public were involved in one of five focus groups. The groups were composed to represent known groups of users and non-users of community pharmacy, namely mothers with young children, seniors and men. RESULTS: Trust was seen as being crucial in healthcare settings. Focus group discussions revealed that participants were inclined to draw unfavourable comparisons between pharmacists and GPs. Importantly, participants' trust in GPs was greater than that in pharmacists. Participants considered pharmacists to be primarily involved in medicine supply, and awareness of the pharmacist's extended role was low. Participants were often reluctant to trust pharmacists to deliver unfamiliar services, particularly those perceived to be ‘high risk’. Numerous system-based factors were identified, which reinforce patient trust and confidence in GPs, including GP registration and appointment systems, GPs' expert/gatekeeper role and practice environments. Our data indicate that the nature and context of public interactions with GPs fostered familiarity with a specific GP or practice, which allowed interpersonal trust to develop. By contrast, participants' exposure to community pharmacists was limited. Additionally, a good understanding of the GPs' level of training and role promoted confidence. CONCLUSION: Current UK initiatives, which aim to implement a range of pharmacist-led services, are undermined by lack of public trust. It seems improbable that the public will trust pharmacists to deliver unfamiliar services, which are perceived to be ‘high risk’, unless health systems change in a way that promotes trust in pharmacists. This may be achieved by increasing the quality and quantity of patient interactions with pharmacists and gaining GP support for extended pharmacy services. BMJ Group 2012-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3358628/ /pubmed/22586286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000939 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Gidman, Wendy
Ward, Paul
McGregor, Lesley
Understanding public trust in services provided by community pharmacists relative to those provided by general practitioners: a qualitative study
title Understanding public trust in services provided by community pharmacists relative to those provided by general practitioners: a qualitative study
title_full Understanding public trust in services provided by community pharmacists relative to those provided by general practitioners: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Understanding public trust in services provided by community pharmacists relative to those provided by general practitioners: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Understanding public trust in services provided by community pharmacists relative to those provided by general practitioners: a qualitative study
title_short Understanding public trust in services provided by community pharmacists relative to those provided by general practitioners: a qualitative study
title_sort understanding public trust in services provided by community pharmacists relative to those provided by general practitioners: a qualitative study
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3358628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22586286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000939
work_keys_str_mv AT gidmanwendy understandingpublictrustinservicesprovidedbycommunitypharmacistsrelativetothoseprovidedbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativestudy
AT wardpaul understandingpublictrustinservicesprovidedbycommunitypharmacistsrelativetothoseprovidedbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativestudy
AT mcgregorlesley understandingpublictrustinservicesprovidedbycommunitypharmacistsrelativetothoseprovidedbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativestudy