Cargando…

Dynamics of ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium clones colonizing hospitalized patients: data from a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the dynamics of colonizing Enterococcus faecium clones during hospitalization, invasive infection and after discharge. METHODS: In a prospective observational study we compared intestinal E. faecium colonization in three patient cohorts: 1) Patients from the Hematol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weisser, Maja, Oostdijk, Evelien A, Willems, Rob JL, Bonten, Marc JM, Frei, Reno, Elzi, Luigia, Halter, Jörg, Widmer, Andreas F, Top, Janetta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3359220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22436212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-68
_version_ 1782233838432288768
author Weisser, Maja
Oostdijk, Evelien A
Willems, Rob JL
Bonten, Marc JM
Frei, Reno
Elzi, Luigia
Halter, Jörg
Widmer, Andreas F
Top, Janetta
author_facet Weisser, Maja
Oostdijk, Evelien A
Willems, Rob JL
Bonten, Marc JM
Frei, Reno
Elzi, Luigia
Halter, Jörg
Widmer, Andreas F
Top, Janetta
author_sort Weisser, Maja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Little is known about the dynamics of colonizing Enterococcus faecium clones during hospitalization, invasive infection and after discharge. METHODS: In a prospective observational study we compared intestinal E. faecium colonization in three patient cohorts: 1) Patients from the Hematology Unit at the University Hospital Basel (UHBS), Switzerland, were investigated by weekly rectal swabs (RS) during hospitalization (group 1a, n = 33) and monthly after discharge (group 1b, n = 21). 2) Patients from the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) at the University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands (group 2, n = 25) were swabbed weekly. 3) Patients with invasive E. faecium infection at UHBS were swabbed at the time of infection (group 3, n = 22). From each RS five colonies with typical E. faecium morphology were picked. Species identification was confirmed by PCR and ampicillin-resistant E. faecium (ARE) isolates were typed using Multiple Locus Variable Number Tandem Repeat Analysis (MLVA). The Simpson's Index of Diversity (SID) was calculated. RESULTS: Out of 558 ARE isolates from 354 RS, MT159 was the most prevalent clone (54%, 100%, 52% and 83% of ARE in groups 1a, 1b, 2 and 3, respectively). Among hematological inpatients 13 (40%) had ARE. During hospitalization, the SID of MLVA-typed ARE decreased from 0.745 [95%CI 0.657-0.833] in week 1 to 0.513 [95%CI 0.388-0.637] in week 3. After discharge the only detected ARE was MT159 in 3 patients. In the ICU (group 2) almost all patients (84%) were colonized with ARE. The SID increased significantly from 0.373 [95%CI 0.175-0.572] at week 1 to a maximum of 0.808 [95%CI 0.768-0.849] at week 3 due to acquisition of multiple ARE clones. All 16 patients with invasive ARE were colonized with the same MLVA clone (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In hospitalized high-risk patients MT159 is the most frequent colonizer and cause of invasive E. faecium infections. During hospitalization, ASE are quickly replaced by ARE. Diversity of ARE increases on units with possible cross-transmission such as ICUs. After hospitalization ARE are lost with the exception of MT159. In invasive infections, the invasive clone is the predominant gut colonizer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3359220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33592202012-05-24 Dynamics of ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium clones colonizing hospitalized patients: data from a prospective observational study Weisser, Maja Oostdijk, Evelien A Willems, Rob JL Bonten, Marc JM Frei, Reno Elzi, Luigia Halter, Jörg Widmer, Andreas F Top, Janetta BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Little is known about the dynamics of colonizing Enterococcus faecium clones during hospitalization, invasive infection and after discharge. METHODS: In a prospective observational study we compared intestinal E. faecium colonization in three patient cohorts: 1) Patients from the Hematology Unit at the University Hospital Basel (UHBS), Switzerland, were investigated by weekly rectal swabs (RS) during hospitalization (group 1a, n = 33) and monthly after discharge (group 1b, n = 21). 2) Patients from the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) at the University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands (group 2, n = 25) were swabbed weekly. 3) Patients with invasive E. faecium infection at UHBS were swabbed at the time of infection (group 3, n = 22). From each RS five colonies with typical E. faecium morphology were picked. Species identification was confirmed by PCR and ampicillin-resistant E. faecium (ARE) isolates were typed using Multiple Locus Variable Number Tandem Repeat Analysis (MLVA). The Simpson's Index of Diversity (SID) was calculated. RESULTS: Out of 558 ARE isolates from 354 RS, MT159 was the most prevalent clone (54%, 100%, 52% and 83% of ARE in groups 1a, 1b, 2 and 3, respectively). Among hematological inpatients 13 (40%) had ARE. During hospitalization, the SID of MLVA-typed ARE decreased from 0.745 [95%CI 0.657-0.833] in week 1 to 0.513 [95%CI 0.388-0.637] in week 3. After discharge the only detected ARE was MT159 in 3 patients. In the ICU (group 2) almost all patients (84%) were colonized with ARE. The SID increased significantly from 0.373 [95%CI 0.175-0.572] at week 1 to a maximum of 0.808 [95%CI 0.768-0.849] at week 3 due to acquisition of multiple ARE clones. All 16 patients with invasive ARE were colonized with the same MLVA clone (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In hospitalized high-risk patients MT159 is the most frequent colonizer and cause of invasive E. faecium infections. During hospitalization, ASE are quickly replaced by ARE. Diversity of ARE increases on units with possible cross-transmission such as ICUs. After hospitalization ARE are lost with the exception of MT159. In invasive infections, the invasive clone is the predominant gut colonizer. BioMed Central 2012-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3359220/ /pubmed/22436212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-68 Text en Copyright ©2012 Weisser et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Weisser, Maja
Oostdijk, Evelien A
Willems, Rob JL
Bonten, Marc JM
Frei, Reno
Elzi, Luigia
Halter, Jörg
Widmer, Andreas F
Top, Janetta
Dynamics of ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium clones colonizing hospitalized patients: data from a prospective observational study
title Dynamics of ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium clones colonizing hospitalized patients: data from a prospective observational study
title_full Dynamics of ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium clones colonizing hospitalized patients: data from a prospective observational study
title_fullStr Dynamics of ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium clones colonizing hospitalized patients: data from a prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Dynamics of ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium clones colonizing hospitalized patients: data from a prospective observational study
title_short Dynamics of ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium clones colonizing hospitalized patients: data from a prospective observational study
title_sort dynamics of ampicillin-resistant enterococcus faecium clones colonizing hospitalized patients: data from a prospective observational study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3359220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22436212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-68
work_keys_str_mv AT weissermaja dynamicsofampicillinresistantenterococcusfaeciumclonescolonizinghospitalizedpatientsdatafromaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT oostdijkeveliena dynamicsofampicillinresistantenterococcusfaeciumclonescolonizinghospitalizedpatientsdatafromaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT willemsrobjl dynamicsofampicillinresistantenterococcusfaeciumclonescolonizinghospitalizedpatientsdatafromaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT bontenmarcjm dynamicsofampicillinresistantenterococcusfaeciumclonescolonizinghospitalizedpatientsdatafromaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT freireno dynamicsofampicillinresistantenterococcusfaeciumclonescolonizinghospitalizedpatientsdatafromaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT elziluigia dynamicsofampicillinresistantenterococcusfaeciumclonescolonizinghospitalizedpatientsdatafromaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT halterjorg dynamicsofampicillinresistantenterococcusfaeciumclonescolonizinghospitalizedpatientsdatafromaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT widmerandreasf dynamicsofampicillinresistantenterococcusfaeciumclonescolonizinghospitalizedpatientsdatafromaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT topjanetta dynamicsofampicillinresistantenterococcusfaeciumclonescolonizinghospitalizedpatientsdatafromaprospectiveobservationalstudy