Cargando…

Single-Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Preliminary Multicentric Comparative Study in 87 Patients with Acute Appendicitis

Introduction. Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has been performed in many approaches such as open, laparoscopic and recently Single Port Access (SPAA). In order to elucidate its potential advantages, we compared the two laparoscopic approaches. Methods. 87 patients were included in a multicentric stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vilallonga, Ramon, Barbaros, Umut, Nada, Ahmed, Sümer, Aziz, Demirel, Tuğrul, Fort, José Manuel, González, Oscar, Armengol, Manuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3359719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22655190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/492409
_version_ 1782233903372697600
author Vilallonga, Ramon
Barbaros, Umut
Nada, Ahmed
Sümer, Aziz
Demirel, Tuğrul
Fort, José Manuel
González, Oscar
Armengol, Manuel
author_facet Vilallonga, Ramon
Barbaros, Umut
Nada, Ahmed
Sümer, Aziz
Demirel, Tuğrul
Fort, José Manuel
González, Oscar
Armengol, Manuel
author_sort Vilallonga, Ramon
collection PubMed
description Introduction. Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has been performed in many approaches such as open, laparoscopic and recently Single Port Access (SPAA). In order to elucidate its potential advantages, we compared the two laparoscopic approaches. Methods. 87 patients were included in a multicentric study for suspected appendicitis in order to perform (SPAA) appendectomy or laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). All outcomes, including blood loss, operative time, complications, and length of stay and pain were recorded prospectively. Results. There were 46 patients in the SPAA group and 41 in the LAG with a mean operative time of 40,4 minutes in the SPAA group and 35,0 minutes in the LA group. Only one patient was converted to an open approach. We described only 2 complications. Pain was graded 2,8 in the SPAA group and 2,9 in the LA group, according to the AVS after 24 hours. Patients in the SPAA Group were more satisfied (7,5 versus 6,9) (P < 0.05). Same results were found for the cosmetic result (8,6 versus 7,4) (P < 0.05). Conclusion. Using the single port approach feasible and safe. The true benefit of the technique should be assessed by new randomised controlled trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3359719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33597192012-05-31 Single-Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Preliminary Multicentric Comparative Study in 87 Patients with Acute Appendicitis Vilallonga, Ramon Barbaros, Umut Nada, Ahmed Sümer, Aziz Demirel, Tuğrul Fort, José Manuel González, Oscar Armengol, Manuel Minim Invasive Surg Research Article Introduction. Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has been performed in many approaches such as open, laparoscopic and recently Single Port Access (SPAA). In order to elucidate its potential advantages, we compared the two laparoscopic approaches. Methods. 87 patients were included in a multicentric study for suspected appendicitis in order to perform (SPAA) appendectomy or laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). All outcomes, including blood loss, operative time, complications, and length of stay and pain were recorded prospectively. Results. There were 46 patients in the SPAA group and 41 in the LAG with a mean operative time of 40,4 minutes in the SPAA group and 35,0 minutes in the LA group. Only one patient was converted to an open approach. We described only 2 complications. Pain was graded 2,8 in the SPAA group and 2,9 in the LA group, according to the AVS after 24 hours. Patients in the SPAA Group were more satisfied (7,5 versus 6,9) (P < 0.05). Same results were found for the cosmetic result (8,6 versus 7,4) (P < 0.05). Conclusion. Using the single port approach feasible and safe. The true benefit of the technique should be assessed by new randomised controlled trials. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3359719/ /pubmed/22655190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/492409 Text en Copyright © 2012 Ramon Vilallonga et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vilallonga, Ramon
Barbaros, Umut
Nada, Ahmed
Sümer, Aziz
Demirel, Tuğrul
Fort, José Manuel
González, Oscar
Armengol, Manuel
Single-Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Preliminary Multicentric Comparative Study in 87 Patients with Acute Appendicitis
title Single-Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Preliminary Multicentric Comparative Study in 87 Patients with Acute Appendicitis
title_full Single-Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Preliminary Multicentric Comparative Study in 87 Patients with Acute Appendicitis
title_fullStr Single-Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Preliminary Multicentric Comparative Study in 87 Patients with Acute Appendicitis
title_full_unstemmed Single-Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Preliminary Multicentric Comparative Study in 87 Patients with Acute Appendicitis
title_short Single-Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Preliminary Multicentric Comparative Study in 87 Patients with Acute Appendicitis
title_sort single-port transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy: a preliminary multicentric comparative study in 87 patients with acute appendicitis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3359719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22655190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/492409
work_keys_str_mv AT vilallongaramon singleporttransumbilicallaparoscopicappendectomyapreliminarymulticentriccomparativestudyin87patientswithacuteappendicitis
AT barbarosumut singleporttransumbilicallaparoscopicappendectomyapreliminarymulticentriccomparativestudyin87patientswithacuteappendicitis
AT nadaahmed singleporttransumbilicallaparoscopicappendectomyapreliminarymulticentriccomparativestudyin87patientswithacuteappendicitis
AT sumeraziz singleporttransumbilicallaparoscopicappendectomyapreliminarymulticentriccomparativestudyin87patientswithacuteappendicitis
AT demireltugrul singleporttransumbilicallaparoscopicappendectomyapreliminarymulticentriccomparativestudyin87patientswithacuteappendicitis
AT fortjosemanuel singleporttransumbilicallaparoscopicappendectomyapreliminarymulticentriccomparativestudyin87patientswithacuteappendicitis
AT gonzalezoscar singleporttransumbilicallaparoscopicappendectomyapreliminarymulticentriccomparativestudyin87patientswithacuteappendicitis
AT armengolmanuel singleporttransumbilicallaparoscopicappendectomyapreliminarymulticentriccomparativestudyin87patientswithacuteappendicitis