Cargando…
How to Join a Wave: Decision-Making Processes in Shimmering Behavior of Giant Honeybees (Apis dorsata)
Shimmering is a collective defence behaviour in Giant honeybees (Apis dorsata) whereby individual bees flip their abdomen upwards, producing Mexican wave-like patterns on the nest surface. Bucket bridging has been used to explain the spread of information in a chain of members including three testab...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3359778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22662123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036736 |
_version_ | 1782233911065051136 |
---|---|
author | Kastberger, Gerald Weihmann, Frank Hoetzl, Thomas Weiss, Sara E. Maurer, Michael Kranner, Ilse |
author_facet | Kastberger, Gerald Weihmann, Frank Hoetzl, Thomas Weiss, Sara E. Maurer, Michael Kranner, Ilse |
author_sort | Kastberger, Gerald |
collection | PubMed |
description | Shimmering is a collective defence behaviour in Giant honeybees (Apis dorsata) whereby individual bees flip their abdomen upwards, producing Mexican wave-like patterns on the nest surface. Bucket bridging has been used to explain the spread of information in a chain of members including three testable concepts: first, linearity assumes that individual “agent bees” that participate in the wave will be affected preferentially from the side of wave origin. The directed-trigger hypothesis addresses the coincidence of the individual property of trigger direction with the collective property of wave direction. Second, continuity describes the transfer of information without being stopped, delayed or re-routed. The active-neighbours hypothesis assumes coincidence between the direction of the majority of shimmering-active neighbours and the trigger direction of the agents. Third, the graduality hypothesis refers to the interaction between an agent and her active neighbours, assuming a proportional relationship in the strength of abdomen flipping of the agent and her previously active neighbours. Shimmering waves provoked by dummy wasps were recorded with high-resolution video cameras. Individual bees were identified by 3D-image analysis, and their strength of abdominal flipping was assessed by pixel-based luminance changes in sequential frames. For each agent, the directedness of wave propagation was based on wave direction, trigger direction, and the direction of the majority of shimmering-active neighbours. The data supported the bucket bridging hypothesis, but only for a small proportion of agents: linearity was confirmed for 2.5%, continuity for 11.3% and graduality for 0.4% of surface bees (but in 2.6% of those agents with high wave-strength levels). The complimentary part of 90% of surface bees did not conform to bucket bridging. This fuzziness is discussed in terms of self-organisation and evolutionary adaptedness in Giant honeybee colonies to respond to rapidly changing threats such as predatory wasps scanning in front of the nest. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3359778 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33597782012-06-01 How to Join a Wave: Decision-Making Processes in Shimmering Behavior of Giant Honeybees (Apis dorsata) Kastberger, Gerald Weihmann, Frank Hoetzl, Thomas Weiss, Sara E. Maurer, Michael Kranner, Ilse PLoS One Research Article Shimmering is a collective defence behaviour in Giant honeybees (Apis dorsata) whereby individual bees flip their abdomen upwards, producing Mexican wave-like patterns on the nest surface. Bucket bridging has been used to explain the spread of information in a chain of members including three testable concepts: first, linearity assumes that individual “agent bees” that participate in the wave will be affected preferentially from the side of wave origin. The directed-trigger hypothesis addresses the coincidence of the individual property of trigger direction with the collective property of wave direction. Second, continuity describes the transfer of information without being stopped, delayed or re-routed. The active-neighbours hypothesis assumes coincidence between the direction of the majority of shimmering-active neighbours and the trigger direction of the agents. Third, the graduality hypothesis refers to the interaction between an agent and her active neighbours, assuming a proportional relationship in the strength of abdomen flipping of the agent and her previously active neighbours. Shimmering waves provoked by dummy wasps were recorded with high-resolution video cameras. Individual bees were identified by 3D-image analysis, and their strength of abdominal flipping was assessed by pixel-based luminance changes in sequential frames. For each agent, the directedness of wave propagation was based on wave direction, trigger direction, and the direction of the majority of shimmering-active neighbours. The data supported the bucket bridging hypothesis, but only for a small proportion of agents: linearity was confirmed for 2.5%, continuity for 11.3% and graduality for 0.4% of surface bees (but in 2.6% of those agents with high wave-strength levels). The complimentary part of 90% of surface bees did not conform to bucket bridging. This fuzziness is discussed in terms of self-organisation and evolutionary adaptedness in Giant honeybee colonies to respond to rapidly changing threats such as predatory wasps scanning in front of the nest. Public Library of Science 2012-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3359778/ /pubmed/22662123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036736 Text en Kastberger et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kastberger, Gerald Weihmann, Frank Hoetzl, Thomas Weiss, Sara E. Maurer, Michael Kranner, Ilse How to Join a Wave: Decision-Making Processes in Shimmering Behavior of Giant Honeybees (Apis dorsata) |
title | How to Join a Wave: Decision-Making Processes in Shimmering Behavior of Giant Honeybees (Apis dorsata) |
title_full | How to Join a Wave: Decision-Making Processes in Shimmering Behavior of Giant Honeybees (Apis dorsata) |
title_fullStr | How to Join a Wave: Decision-Making Processes in Shimmering Behavior of Giant Honeybees (Apis dorsata) |
title_full_unstemmed | How to Join a Wave: Decision-Making Processes in Shimmering Behavior of Giant Honeybees (Apis dorsata) |
title_short | How to Join a Wave: Decision-Making Processes in Shimmering Behavior of Giant Honeybees (Apis dorsata) |
title_sort | how to join a wave: decision-making processes in shimmering behavior of giant honeybees (apis dorsata) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3359778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22662123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036736 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kastbergergerald howtojoinawavedecisionmakingprocessesinshimmeringbehaviorofgianthoneybeesapisdorsata AT weihmannfrank howtojoinawavedecisionmakingprocessesinshimmeringbehaviorofgianthoneybeesapisdorsata AT hoetzlthomas howtojoinawavedecisionmakingprocessesinshimmeringbehaviorofgianthoneybeesapisdorsata AT weisssarae howtojoinawavedecisionmakingprocessesinshimmeringbehaviorofgianthoneybeesapisdorsata AT maurermichael howtojoinawavedecisionmakingprocessesinshimmeringbehaviorofgianthoneybeesapisdorsata AT krannerilse howtojoinawavedecisionmakingprocessesinshimmeringbehaviorofgianthoneybeesapisdorsata |