Cargando…

Validation and justification of the phylum name Cryptomycota phyl. nov.

The recently proposed new phylum name Cryptomycota phyl. nov. is validly published in order to facilitate its use in future discussions of the ecology, biology, and phylogenetic relationships of the constituent organisms. This name is preferred over the previously tentatively proposed “Rozellida” as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Meredith D.M., Richards, Thomas A., Hawksworth, David L., Bass, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nationaal Herbarium Nederland & Centraallbureau voor Schimmelcultures 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3359815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22679602
http://dx.doi.org/10.5598/imafungus.2011.02.02.08
_version_ 1782233917512744960
author Jones, Meredith D.M.
Richards, Thomas A.
Hawksworth, David L.
Bass, David
author_facet Jones, Meredith D.M.
Richards, Thomas A.
Hawksworth, David L.
Bass, David
author_sort Jones, Meredith D.M.
collection PubMed
description The recently proposed new phylum name Cryptomycota phyl. nov. is validly published in order to facilitate its use in future discussions of the ecology, biology, and phylogenetic relationships of the constituent organisms. This name is preferred over the previously tentatively proposed “Rozellida” as new data suggest that the life-style and morphology of Rozella is not representative of the large radiation to which it and other Cryptomycota belong. Furthermore, taxa at higher ranks such as phylum are considered better not based on individual names of included genera, but rather on some special characteristics – in this case the cryptic nature of this group and that they were initially revealed by molecular methods rather than morphological discovery. If the group were later viewed as a member of a different kingdom, the name should be retained to indicate its fungal affinities, as is the practice for other fungal-like protist groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3359815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Nationaal Herbarium Nederland & Centraallbureau voor Schimmelcultures
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33598152012-06-07 Validation and justification of the phylum name Cryptomycota phyl. nov. Jones, Meredith D.M. Richards, Thomas A. Hawksworth, David L. Bass, David IMA Fungus Article The recently proposed new phylum name Cryptomycota phyl. nov. is validly published in order to facilitate its use in future discussions of the ecology, biology, and phylogenetic relationships of the constituent organisms. This name is preferred over the previously tentatively proposed “Rozellida” as new data suggest that the life-style and morphology of Rozella is not representative of the large radiation to which it and other Cryptomycota belong. Furthermore, taxa at higher ranks such as phylum are considered better not based on individual names of included genera, but rather on some special characteristics – in this case the cryptic nature of this group and that they were initially revealed by molecular methods rather than morphological discovery. If the group were later viewed as a member of a different kingdom, the name should be retained to indicate its fungal affinities, as is the practice for other fungal-like protist groups. Nationaal Herbarium Nederland & Centraallbureau voor Schimmelcultures 2011-11-11 2011-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3359815/ /pubmed/22679602 http://dx.doi.org/10.5598/imafungus.2011.02.02.08 Text en © 2011 International Mycological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode You are free to share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work, under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non-commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No derivative works: You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work, which can be found at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder. Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the author’s moral rights.
spellingShingle Article
Jones, Meredith D.M.
Richards, Thomas A.
Hawksworth, David L.
Bass, David
Validation and justification of the phylum name Cryptomycota phyl. nov.
title Validation and justification of the phylum name Cryptomycota phyl. nov.
title_full Validation and justification of the phylum name Cryptomycota phyl. nov.
title_fullStr Validation and justification of the phylum name Cryptomycota phyl. nov.
title_full_unstemmed Validation and justification of the phylum name Cryptomycota phyl. nov.
title_short Validation and justification of the phylum name Cryptomycota phyl. nov.
title_sort validation and justification of the phylum name cryptomycota phyl. nov.
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3359815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22679602
http://dx.doi.org/10.5598/imafungus.2011.02.02.08
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesmeredithdm validationandjustificationofthephylumnamecryptomycotaphylnov
AT richardsthomasa validationandjustificationofthephylumnamecryptomycotaphylnov
AT hawksworthdavidl validationandjustificationofthephylumnamecryptomycotaphylnov
AT bassdavid validationandjustificationofthephylumnamecryptomycotaphylnov