Cargando…

Influence of Different Restorative Techniques on the Strength of Endodontically Treated Weakened Roots

Objective. Comparing effect of different restoration techniques on fracture resistance of compromised roots. Methods. Crowns of 100 single-rooted teeth were sectioned and 10 roots were kept as negative control group (Group 1). Remaining roots were instrumented and divided into one and positive contr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alsamadani, Khalid H., Abdaziz, El-Sayed Mohammed, Gad, El-Sayed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3359834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22666251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/343712
_version_ 1782233920759136256
author Alsamadani, Khalid H.
Abdaziz, El-Sayed Mohammed
Gad, El-Sayed
author_facet Alsamadani, Khalid H.
Abdaziz, El-Sayed Mohammed
Gad, El-Sayed
author_sort Alsamadani, Khalid H.
collection PubMed
description Objective. Comparing effect of different restoration techniques on fracture resistance of compromised roots. Methods. Crowns of 100 single-rooted teeth were sectioned and 10 roots were kept as negative control group (Group 1). Remaining roots were instrumented and divided into one and positive control group of 10 samples (Group 2) and 4 experimental groups of 20 samples each. Group 3: roots were obturated with gutta-percha; Group 4: roots were restored with gutta-percha, composite, and glass fiber post; Group 5: roots were obturated with Resilon; Group 6: Roots were restored with Resilon, composite, and glass fiber post. Roots were weakened before obturation in groups 2, 3, and 5 and after obturation in groups 4 and 6. Fracture strengths were measured using Dartec testing machine and fracture load was recorded in kilo-Newton. Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA and Tukeys test. Results. The fractures resistance of restored roots was significantly higher in groups 4, 5, and 6 than in Groups 2 and 3. There were no significant differences between groups 1, 4, 5, and 6. Conclusions. Restoration of weakened roots with Resilon or bonding an intermediate composite resin to coronal radicular dentin and to glass fiber post increased their fracture resistance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3359834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33598342012-06-04 Influence of Different Restorative Techniques on the Strength of Endodontically Treated Weakened Roots Alsamadani, Khalid H. Abdaziz, El-Sayed Mohammed Gad, El-Sayed Int J Dent Research Article Objective. Comparing effect of different restoration techniques on fracture resistance of compromised roots. Methods. Crowns of 100 single-rooted teeth were sectioned and 10 roots were kept as negative control group (Group 1). Remaining roots were instrumented and divided into one and positive control group of 10 samples (Group 2) and 4 experimental groups of 20 samples each. Group 3: roots were obturated with gutta-percha; Group 4: roots were restored with gutta-percha, composite, and glass fiber post; Group 5: roots were obturated with Resilon; Group 6: Roots were restored with Resilon, composite, and glass fiber post. Roots were weakened before obturation in groups 2, 3, and 5 and after obturation in groups 4 and 6. Fracture strengths were measured using Dartec testing machine and fracture load was recorded in kilo-Newton. Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA and Tukeys test. Results. The fractures resistance of restored roots was significantly higher in groups 4, 5, and 6 than in Groups 2 and 3. There were no significant differences between groups 1, 4, 5, and 6. Conclusions. Restoration of weakened roots with Resilon or bonding an intermediate composite resin to coronal radicular dentin and to glass fiber post increased their fracture resistance. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3359834/ /pubmed/22666251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/343712 Text en Copyright © 2012 Khalid H. Alsamadani et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Alsamadani, Khalid H.
Abdaziz, El-Sayed Mohammed
Gad, El-Sayed
Influence of Different Restorative Techniques on the Strength of Endodontically Treated Weakened Roots
title Influence of Different Restorative Techniques on the Strength of Endodontically Treated Weakened Roots
title_full Influence of Different Restorative Techniques on the Strength of Endodontically Treated Weakened Roots
title_fullStr Influence of Different Restorative Techniques on the Strength of Endodontically Treated Weakened Roots
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Different Restorative Techniques on the Strength of Endodontically Treated Weakened Roots
title_short Influence of Different Restorative Techniques on the Strength of Endodontically Treated Weakened Roots
title_sort influence of different restorative techniques on the strength of endodontically treated weakened roots
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3359834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22666251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/343712
work_keys_str_mv AT alsamadanikhalidh influenceofdifferentrestorativetechniquesonthestrengthofendodonticallytreatedweakenedroots
AT abdazizelsayedmohammed influenceofdifferentrestorativetechniquesonthestrengthofendodonticallytreatedweakenedroots
AT gadelsayed influenceofdifferentrestorativetechniquesonthestrengthofendodonticallytreatedweakenedroots