Cargando…

The Effect of Stimulus Duration and Motor Response in Hemispatial Neglect during a Visual Search Task

Patients with hemispatial neglect exhibit a myriad of profound deficits. A hallmark of this syndrome is the patients' absence of awareness of items located in their contralesional space. Many studies, however, have demonstrated that neglect patients exhibit some level of processing of these neg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jelsone-Swain, Laura M., Smith, David V., Baylis, Gordon C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3360686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22662149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037369
_version_ 1782234037666971648
author Jelsone-Swain, Laura M.
Smith, David V.
Baylis, Gordon C.
author_facet Jelsone-Swain, Laura M.
Smith, David V.
Baylis, Gordon C.
author_sort Jelsone-Swain, Laura M.
collection PubMed
description Patients with hemispatial neglect exhibit a myriad of profound deficits. A hallmark of this syndrome is the patients' absence of awareness of items located in their contralesional space. Many studies, however, have demonstrated that neglect patients exhibit some level of processing of these neglected items. It has been suggested that unconscious processing of neglected information may manifest as a fast denial. This theory of fast denial proposes that neglected stimuli are detected in the same way as non-neglected stimuli, but without overt awareness. We evaluated the fast denial theory by conducting two separate visual search task experiments, each differing by the duration of stimulus presentation. Specifically, in Experiment 1 each stimulus remained in the participants' visual field until a response was made. In Experiment 2 each stimulus was presented for only a brief duration. We further evaluated the fast denial theory by comparing verbal to motor task responses in each experiment. Overall, our results from both experiments and tasks showed no evidence for the presence of implicit knowledge of neglected stimuli. Instead, patients with neglect responded the same when they neglected stimuli as when they correctly reported stimulus absence. These findings thus cast doubt on the concept of the fast denial theory and its consequent implications for non-conscious processing. Importantly, our study demonstrated that the only behavior affected was during conscious detection of ipsilesional stimuli. Specifically, patients were slower to detect stimuli in Experiment 1 compared to Experiment 2, suggesting a duration effect occurred during conscious processing of information. Additionally, reaction time and accuracy were similar when reporting verbally versus motorically. These results provide new insights into the perceptual deficits associated with neglect and further support other work that falsifies the fast denial account of non-conscious processing in hemispatial visual neglect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3360686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33606862012-06-01 The Effect of Stimulus Duration and Motor Response in Hemispatial Neglect during a Visual Search Task Jelsone-Swain, Laura M. Smith, David V. Baylis, Gordon C. PLoS One Research Article Patients with hemispatial neglect exhibit a myriad of profound deficits. A hallmark of this syndrome is the patients' absence of awareness of items located in their contralesional space. Many studies, however, have demonstrated that neglect patients exhibit some level of processing of these neglected items. It has been suggested that unconscious processing of neglected information may manifest as a fast denial. This theory of fast denial proposes that neglected stimuli are detected in the same way as non-neglected stimuli, but without overt awareness. We evaluated the fast denial theory by conducting two separate visual search task experiments, each differing by the duration of stimulus presentation. Specifically, in Experiment 1 each stimulus remained in the participants' visual field until a response was made. In Experiment 2 each stimulus was presented for only a brief duration. We further evaluated the fast denial theory by comparing verbal to motor task responses in each experiment. Overall, our results from both experiments and tasks showed no evidence for the presence of implicit knowledge of neglected stimuli. Instead, patients with neglect responded the same when they neglected stimuli as when they correctly reported stimulus absence. These findings thus cast doubt on the concept of the fast denial theory and its consequent implications for non-conscious processing. Importantly, our study demonstrated that the only behavior affected was during conscious detection of ipsilesional stimuli. Specifically, patients were slower to detect stimuli in Experiment 1 compared to Experiment 2, suggesting a duration effect occurred during conscious processing of information. Additionally, reaction time and accuracy were similar when reporting verbally versus motorically. These results provide new insights into the perceptual deficits associated with neglect and further support other work that falsifies the fast denial account of non-conscious processing in hemispatial visual neglect. Public Library of Science 2012-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3360686/ /pubmed/22662149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037369 Text en Jelsone-Swain et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jelsone-Swain, Laura M.
Smith, David V.
Baylis, Gordon C.
The Effect of Stimulus Duration and Motor Response in Hemispatial Neglect during a Visual Search Task
title The Effect of Stimulus Duration and Motor Response in Hemispatial Neglect during a Visual Search Task
title_full The Effect of Stimulus Duration and Motor Response in Hemispatial Neglect during a Visual Search Task
title_fullStr The Effect of Stimulus Duration and Motor Response in Hemispatial Neglect during a Visual Search Task
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Stimulus Duration and Motor Response in Hemispatial Neglect during a Visual Search Task
title_short The Effect of Stimulus Duration and Motor Response in Hemispatial Neglect during a Visual Search Task
title_sort effect of stimulus duration and motor response in hemispatial neglect during a visual search task
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3360686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22662149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037369
work_keys_str_mv AT jelsoneswainlauram theeffectofstimulusdurationandmotorresponseinhemispatialneglectduringavisualsearchtask
AT smithdavidv theeffectofstimulusdurationandmotorresponseinhemispatialneglectduringavisualsearchtask
AT baylisgordonc theeffectofstimulusdurationandmotorresponseinhemispatialneglectduringavisualsearchtask
AT jelsoneswainlauram effectofstimulusdurationandmotorresponseinhemispatialneglectduringavisualsearchtask
AT smithdavidv effectofstimulusdurationandmotorresponseinhemispatialneglectduringavisualsearchtask
AT baylisgordonc effectofstimulusdurationandmotorresponseinhemispatialneglectduringavisualsearchtask