Cargando…
Evaluation of a Rapid Dipstick (Crystal VC) for the Diagnosis of Cholera in Zanzibar and a Comparison with Previous Studies
BACKGROUND: The gold standard for the diagnosis of cholera is stool culture, but this requires laboratory facilities and takes at least 24 hours. A rapid diagnostic test (RDT) that can be used by minimally trained staff at treatment centers could potentially improve the reporting and management of c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3360732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22662131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036930 |
_version_ | 1782234041598083072 |
---|---|
author | Ley, Benedikt Khatib, Ahmed M. Thriemer, Kamala von Seidlein, Lorenz Deen, Jacqueline Mukhopadyay, Asish Chang, Na-Yoon Hashim, Ramadhan Schmied, Wolfgang Busch, Clara J-L. Reyburn, Rita Wierzba, Thomas Clemens, John D. Wilfing, Harald Enwere, Godwin Aguado, Theresa Jiddawi, Mohammad S. Sack, David Ali, Said M. |
author_facet | Ley, Benedikt Khatib, Ahmed M. Thriemer, Kamala von Seidlein, Lorenz Deen, Jacqueline Mukhopadyay, Asish Chang, Na-Yoon Hashim, Ramadhan Schmied, Wolfgang Busch, Clara J-L. Reyburn, Rita Wierzba, Thomas Clemens, John D. Wilfing, Harald Enwere, Godwin Aguado, Theresa Jiddawi, Mohammad S. Sack, David Ali, Said M. |
author_sort | Ley, Benedikt |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The gold standard for the diagnosis of cholera is stool culture, but this requires laboratory facilities and takes at least 24 hours. A rapid diagnostic test (RDT) that can be used by minimally trained staff at treatment centers could potentially improve the reporting and management of cholera outbreaks. METHODS: We evaluated the Crystal VC™ RDT under field conditions in Zanzibar in 2009. Patients presenting to treatment centers with watery diarrhea provided a stool sample for rapid diagnostic testing. Results were compared to stool culture performed in a reference laboratory. We assessed the overall performance of the RDT and evaluated whether previous intake of antibiotics, intravenous fluids, location of testing, and skill level of the technician affected the RDT results. RESULTS: We included stool samples from 624 patients. Compared to culture, the overall sensitivity of the RDT was 93.1% (95%CI: 88.7 to 96.2%), specificity was 49.2% (95%CI: 44.3 to 54.1%), the positive predictive value was 47.0% (95%CI: 42.1 to 52.0%) and the negative predictive value was 93.6% (95%CI: 89.6 to 96.5%). The overall false positivity rate was 50.8% (213/419); fieldworkers frequently misread very faint test lines as positive. CONCLUSION: The observed sensitivity of the Crystal VC RDT evaluated was similar compared to earlier versions, while specificity was poorer. The current version of the RDT could potentially be used as a screening tool in the field. Because of the high proportion of false positive results when field workers test stool specimens, positive results will need to be confirmed with stool culture. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3360732 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33607322012-06-01 Evaluation of a Rapid Dipstick (Crystal VC) for the Diagnosis of Cholera in Zanzibar and a Comparison with Previous Studies Ley, Benedikt Khatib, Ahmed M. Thriemer, Kamala von Seidlein, Lorenz Deen, Jacqueline Mukhopadyay, Asish Chang, Na-Yoon Hashim, Ramadhan Schmied, Wolfgang Busch, Clara J-L. Reyburn, Rita Wierzba, Thomas Clemens, John D. Wilfing, Harald Enwere, Godwin Aguado, Theresa Jiddawi, Mohammad S. Sack, David Ali, Said M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The gold standard for the diagnosis of cholera is stool culture, but this requires laboratory facilities and takes at least 24 hours. A rapid diagnostic test (RDT) that can be used by minimally trained staff at treatment centers could potentially improve the reporting and management of cholera outbreaks. METHODS: We evaluated the Crystal VC™ RDT under field conditions in Zanzibar in 2009. Patients presenting to treatment centers with watery diarrhea provided a stool sample for rapid diagnostic testing. Results were compared to stool culture performed in a reference laboratory. We assessed the overall performance of the RDT and evaluated whether previous intake of antibiotics, intravenous fluids, location of testing, and skill level of the technician affected the RDT results. RESULTS: We included stool samples from 624 patients. Compared to culture, the overall sensitivity of the RDT was 93.1% (95%CI: 88.7 to 96.2%), specificity was 49.2% (95%CI: 44.3 to 54.1%), the positive predictive value was 47.0% (95%CI: 42.1 to 52.0%) and the negative predictive value was 93.6% (95%CI: 89.6 to 96.5%). The overall false positivity rate was 50.8% (213/419); fieldworkers frequently misread very faint test lines as positive. CONCLUSION: The observed sensitivity of the Crystal VC RDT evaluated was similar compared to earlier versions, while specificity was poorer. The current version of the RDT could potentially be used as a screening tool in the field. Because of the high proportion of false positive results when field workers test stool specimens, positive results will need to be confirmed with stool culture. Public Library of Science 2012-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3360732/ /pubmed/22662131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036930 Text en Ley et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ley, Benedikt Khatib, Ahmed M. Thriemer, Kamala von Seidlein, Lorenz Deen, Jacqueline Mukhopadyay, Asish Chang, Na-Yoon Hashim, Ramadhan Schmied, Wolfgang Busch, Clara J-L. Reyburn, Rita Wierzba, Thomas Clemens, John D. Wilfing, Harald Enwere, Godwin Aguado, Theresa Jiddawi, Mohammad S. Sack, David Ali, Said M. Evaluation of a Rapid Dipstick (Crystal VC) for the Diagnosis of Cholera in Zanzibar and a Comparison with Previous Studies |
title | Evaluation of a Rapid Dipstick (Crystal VC) for the Diagnosis of Cholera in Zanzibar and a Comparison with Previous Studies |
title_full | Evaluation of a Rapid Dipstick (Crystal VC) for the Diagnosis of Cholera in Zanzibar and a Comparison with Previous Studies |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a Rapid Dipstick (Crystal VC) for the Diagnosis of Cholera in Zanzibar and a Comparison with Previous Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a Rapid Dipstick (Crystal VC) for the Diagnosis of Cholera in Zanzibar and a Comparison with Previous Studies |
title_short | Evaluation of a Rapid Dipstick (Crystal VC) for the Diagnosis of Cholera in Zanzibar and a Comparison with Previous Studies |
title_sort | evaluation of a rapid dipstick (crystal vc) for the diagnosis of cholera in zanzibar and a comparison with previous studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3360732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22662131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036930 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leybenedikt evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies AT khatibahmedm evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies AT thriemerkamala evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies AT vonseidleinlorenz evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies AT deenjacqueline evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies AT mukhopadyayasish evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies AT changnayoon evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies AT hashimramadhan evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies AT schmiedwolfgang evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies AT buschclarajl evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies AT reyburnrita evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies AT wierzbathomas evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies AT clemensjohnd evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies AT wilfingharald evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies AT enweregodwin evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies AT aguadotheresa evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies AT jiddawimohammads evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies AT sackdavid evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies AT alisaidm evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies |