Cargando…

Evaluation of a Rapid Dipstick (Crystal VC) for the Diagnosis of Cholera in Zanzibar and a Comparison with Previous Studies

BACKGROUND: The gold standard for the diagnosis of cholera is stool culture, but this requires laboratory facilities and takes at least 24 hours. A rapid diagnostic test (RDT) that can be used by minimally trained staff at treatment centers could potentially improve the reporting and management of c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ley, Benedikt, Khatib, Ahmed M., Thriemer, Kamala, von Seidlein, Lorenz, Deen, Jacqueline, Mukhopadyay, Asish, Chang, Na-Yoon, Hashim, Ramadhan, Schmied, Wolfgang, Busch, Clara J-L., Reyburn, Rita, Wierzba, Thomas, Clemens, John D., Wilfing, Harald, Enwere, Godwin, Aguado, Theresa, Jiddawi, Mohammad S., Sack, David, Ali, Said M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3360732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22662131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036930
_version_ 1782234041598083072
author Ley, Benedikt
Khatib, Ahmed M.
Thriemer, Kamala
von Seidlein, Lorenz
Deen, Jacqueline
Mukhopadyay, Asish
Chang, Na-Yoon
Hashim, Ramadhan
Schmied, Wolfgang
Busch, Clara J-L.
Reyburn, Rita
Wierzba, Thomas
Clemens, John D.
Wilfing, Harald
Enwere, Godwin
Aguado, Theresa
Jiddawi, Mohammad S.
Sack, David
Ali, Said M.
author_facet Ley, Benedikt
Khatib, Ahmed M.
Thriemer, Kamala
von Seidlein, Lorenz
Deen, Jacqueline
Mukhopadyay, Asish
Chang, Na-Yoon
Hashim, Ramadhan
Schmied, Wolfgang
Busch, Clara J-L.
Reyburn, Rita
Wierzba, Thomas
Clemens, John D.
Wilfing, Harald
Enwere, Godwin
Aguado, Theresa
Jiddawi, Mohammad S.
Sack, David
Ali, Said M.
author_sort Ley, Benedikt
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The gold standard for the diagnosis of cholera is stool culture, but this requires laboratory facilities and takes at least 24 hours. A rapid diagnostic test (RDT) that can be used by minimally trained staff at treatment centers could potentially improve the reporting and management of cholera outbreaks. METHODS: We evaluated the Crystal VC™ RDT under field conditions in Zanzibar in 2009. Patients presenting to treatment centers with watery diarrhea provided a stool sample for rapid diagnostic testing. Results were compared to stool culture performed in a reference laboratory. We assessed the overall performance of the RDT and evaluated whether previous intake of antibiotics, intravenous fluids, location of testing, and skill level of the technician affected the RDT results. RESULTS: We included stool samples from 624 patients. Compared to culture, the overall sensitivity of the RDT was 93.1% (95%CI: 88.7 to 96.2%), specificity was 49.2% (95%CI: 44.3 to 54.1%), the positive predictive value was 47.0% (95%CI: 42.1 to 52.0%) and the negative predictive value was 93.6% (95%CI: 89.6 to 96.5%). The overall false positivity rate was 50.8% (213/419); fieldworkers frequently misread very faint test lines as positive. CONCLUSION: The observed sensitivity of the Crystal VC RDT evaluated was similar compared to earlier versions, while specificity was poorer. The current version of the RDT could potentially be used as a screening tool in the field. Because of the high proportion of false positive results when field workers test stool specimens, positive results will need to be confirmed with stool culture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3360732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33607322012-06-01 Evaluation of a Rapid Dipstick (Crystal VC) for the Diagnosis of Cholera in Zanzibar and a Comparison with Previous Studies Ley, Benedikt Khatib, Ahmed M. Thriemer, Kamala von Seidlein, Lorenz Deen, Jacqueline Mukhopadyay, Asish Chang, Na-Yoon Hashim, Ramadhan Schmied, Wolfgang Busch, Clara J-L. Reyburn, Rita Wierzba, Thomas Clemens, John D. Wilfing, Harald Enwere, Godwin Aguado, Theresa Jiddawi, Mohammad S. Sack, David Ali, Said M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The gold standard for the diagnosis of cholera is stool culture, but this requires laboratory facilities and takes at least 24 hours. A rapid diagnostic test (RDT) that can be used by minimally trained staff at treatment centers could potentially improve the reporting and management of cholera outbreaks. METHODS: We evaluated the Crystal VC™ RDT under field conditions in Zanzibar in 2009. Patients presenting to treatment centers with watery diarrhea provided a stool sample for rapid diagnostic testing. Results were compared to stool culture performed in a reference laboratory. We assessed the overall performance of the RDT and evaluated whether previous intake of antibiotics, intravenous fluids, location of testing, and skill level of the technician affected the RDT results. RESULTS: We included stool samples from 624 patients. Compared to culture, the overall sensitivity of the RDT was 93.1% (95%CI: 88.7 to 96.2%), specificity was 49.2% (95%CI: 44.3 to 54.1%), the positive predictive value was 47.0% (95%CI: 42.1 to 52.0%) and the negative predictive value was 93.6% (95%CI: 89.6 to 96.5%). The overall false positivity rate was 50.8% (213/419); fieldworkers frequently misread very faint test lines as positive. CONCLUSION: The observed sensitivity of the Crystal VC RDT evaluated was similar compared to earlier versions, while specificity was poorer. The current version of the RDT could potentially be used as a screening tool in the field. Because of the high proportion of false positive results when field workers test stool specimens, positive results will need to be confirmed with stool culture. Public Library of Science 2012-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3360732/ /pubmed/22662131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036930 Text en Ley et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ley, Benedikt
Khatib, Ahmed M.
Thriemer, Kamala
von Seidlein, Lorenz
Deen, Jacqueline
Mukhopadyay, Asish
Chang, Na-Yoon
Hashim, Ramadhan
Schmied, Wolfgang
Busch, Clara J-L.
Reyburn, Rita
Wierzba, Thomas
Clemens, John D.
Wilfing, Harald
Enwere, Godwin
Aguado, Theresa
Jiddawi, Mohammad S.
Sack, David
Ali, Said M.
Evaluation of a Rapid Dipstick (Crystal VC) for the Diagnosis of Cholera in Zanzibar and a Comparison with Previous Studies
title Evaluation of a Rapid Dipstick (Crystal VC) for the Diagnosis of Cholera in Zanzibar and a Comparison with Previous Studies
title_full Evaluation of a Rapid Dipstick (Crystal VC) for the Diagnosis of Cholera in Zanzibar and a Comparison with Previous Studies
title_fullStr Evaluation of a Rapid Dipstick (Crystal VC) for the Diagnosis of Cholera in Zanzibar and a Comparison with Previous Studies
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a Rapid Dipstick (Crystal VC) for the Diagnosis of Cholera in Zanzibar and a Comparison with Previous Studies
title_short Evaluation of a Rapid Dipstick (Crystal VC) for the Diagnosis of Cholera in Zanzibar and a Comparison with Previous Studies
title_sort evaluation of a rapid dipstick (crystal vc) for the diagnosis of cholera in zanzibar and a comparison with previous studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3360732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22662131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036930
work_keys_str_mv AT leybenedikt evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies
AT khatibahmedm evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies
AT thriemerkamala evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies
AT vonseidleinlorenz evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies
AT deenjacqueline evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies
AT mukhopadyayasish evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies
AT changnayoon evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies
AT hashimramadhan evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies
AT schmiedwolfgang evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies
AT buschclarajl evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies
AT reyburnrita evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies
AT wierzbathomas evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies
AT clemensjohnd evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies
AT wilfingharald evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies
AT enweregodwin evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies
AT aguadotheresa evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies
AT jiddawimohammads evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies
AT sackdavid evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies
AT alisaidm evaluationofarapiddipstickcrystalvcforthediagnosisofcholerainzanzibarandacomparisonwithpreviousstudies