Cargando…

Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry for Quantification of Visceral Fat

Obesity is the major risk factor for metabolic syndrome and through it diabetes as well as cardiovascular disease. Visceral fat (VF) rather than subcutaneous fat (SF) is the major predictor of adverse events. Currently, the reference standard for measuring VF is abdominal X-ray computed tomography (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaul, Sanjiv, Rothney, Megan P., Peters, Dawn M., Wacker, Wynn K., Davis, Cynthia E., Shapiro, Michael D., Ergun, David L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3361068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22282048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/oby.2011.393
_version_ 1782234077968990208
author Kaul, Sanjiv
Rothney, Megan P.
Peters, Dawn M.
Wacker, Wynn K.
Davis, Cynthia E.
Shapiro, Michael D.
Ergun, David L.
author_facet Kaul, Sanjiv
Rothney, Megan P.
Peters, Dawn M.
Wacker, Wynn K.
Davis, Cynthia E.
Shapiro, Michael D.
Ergun, David L.
author_sort Kaul, Sanjiv
collection PubMed
description Obesity is the major risk factor for metabolic syndrome and through it diabetes as well as cardiovascular disease. Visceral fat (VF) rather than subcutaneous fat (SF) is the major predictor of adverse events. Currently, the reference standard for measuring VF is abdominal X-ray computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), requiring highly used clinical equipment. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) can accurately measure body composition with high-precision, low X-ray exposure, and short-scanning time. The purpose of this study was to validate a new fully automated method whereby abdominal VF can be measured by DXA. Furthermore, we explored the association between DXA-derived abdominal VF and several other indices for obesity: BMI, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and DXA-derived total abdominal fat (AF), and SF. We studied 124 adult men and women, aged 18–90 years, representing a wide range of BMI values (18.5–40 kg/m(2)) measured with both DXA and CT in a fasting state within a one hour interval. The coefficient of determination (r(2)) for regression of CT on DXA values was 0.959 for females, 0.949 for males, and 0.957 combined. The 95% confidence interval for r was 0.968 to 0.985 for the combined data. The 95% confidence interval for the mean of the differences between CT and DXA VF volume was −96.0 to −16.3 cm(3). Bland–Altman bias was +67 cm(3) for females and +43 cm(3) for males. The 95% limits of agreement were −339 to +472 cm(3) for females and −379 to +465 cm(3) for males. Combined, the bias was +56 cm(3) with 95% limits of agreement of −355 to +468 cm(3). The correlations between DXA-derived VF and BMI, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and DXA-derived AF and SF ranged from poor to modest. We conclude that DXA can measure abdominal VF precisely in both men and women. This simple noninvasive method with virtually no radiation can therefore be used to measure VF in individual patients and help define diabetes and cardiovascular risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3361068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33610682012-05-29 Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry for Quantification of Visceral Fat Kaul, Sanjiv Rothney, Megan P. Peters, Dawn M. Wacker, Wynn K. Davis, Cynthia E. Shapiro, Michael D. Ergun, David L. Obesity (Silver Spring) Methods and Techniques Obesity is the major risk factor for metabolic syndrome and through it diabetes as well as cardiovascular disease. Visceral fat (VF) rather than subcutaneous fat (SF) is the major predictor of adverse events. Currently, the reference standard for measuring VF is abdominal X-ray computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), requiring highly used clinical equipment. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) can accurately measure body composition with high-precision, low X-ray exposure, and short-scanning time. The purpose of this study was to validate a new fully automated method whereby abdominal VF can be measured by DXA. Furthermore, we explored the association between DXA-derived abdominal VF and several other indices for obesity: BMI, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and DXA-derived total abdominal fat (AF), and SF. We studied 124 adult men and women, aged 18–90 years, representing a wide range of BMI values (18.5–40 kg/m(2)) measured with both DXA and CT in a fasting state within a one hour interval. The coefficient of determination (r(2)) for regression of CT on DXA values was 0.959 for females, 0.949 for males, and 0.957 combined. The 95% confidence interval for r was 0.968 to 0.985 for the combined data. The 95% confidence interval for the mean of the differences between CT and DXA VF volume was −96.0 to −16.3 cm(3). Bland–Altman bias was +67 cm(3) for females and +43 cm(3) for males. The 95% limits of agreement were −339 to +472 cm(3) for females and −379 to +465 cm(3) for males. Combined, the bias was +56 cm(3) with 95% limits of agreement of −355 to +468 cm(3). The correlations between DXA-derived VF and BMI, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and DXA-derived AF and SF ranged from poor to modest. We conclude that DXA can measure abdominal VF precisely in both men and women. This simple noninvasive method with virtually no radiation can therefore be used to measure VF in individual patients and help define diabetes and cardiovascular risk. Nature Publishing Group 2012-06 2012-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3361068/ /pubmed/22282048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/oby.2011.393 Text en Copyright © 2012 The Obesity Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
spellingShingle Methods and Techniques
Kaul, Sanjiv
Rothney, Megan P.
Peters, Dawn M.
Wacker, Wynn K.
Davis, Cynthia E.
Shapiro, Michael D.
Ergun, David L.
Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry for Quantification of Visceral Fat
title Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry for Quantification of Visceral Fat
title_full Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry for Quantification of Visceral Fat
title_fullStr Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry for Quantification of Visceral Fat
title_full_unstemmed Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry for Quantification of Visceral Fat
title_short Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry for Quantification of Visceral Fat
title_sort dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for quantification of visceral fat
topic Methods and Techniques
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3361068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22282048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/oby.2011.393
work_keys_str_mv AT kaulsanjiv dualenergyxrayabsorptiometryforquantificationofvisceralfat
AT rothneymeganp dualenergyxrayabsorptiometryforquantificationofvisceralfat
AT petersdawnm dualenergyxrayabsorptiometryforquantificationofvisceralfat
AT wackerwynnk dualenergyxrayabsorptiometryforquantificationofvisceralfat
AT daviscynthiae dualenergyxrayabsorptiometryforquantificationofvisceralfat
AT shapiromichaeld dualenergyxrayabsorptiometryforquantificationofvisceralfat
AT ergundavidl dualenergyxrayabsorptiometryforquantificationofvisceralfat