Cargando…

A comparative study of defibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance during simulated cardiac arrest in nursing student teams

BACKGROUND: Although nurses must be able to respond quickly and effectively to cardiac arrest, numerous studies have demonstrated poor performance. Simulation is a promising learning tool for resuscitation team training but there are few studies that examine simulation for training defibrillation an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eikeland Husebø, Sissel I, Bjørshol, Conrad A, Rystedt, Hans, Friberg, Febe, Søreide, Eldar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3361478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22472128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-20-23
_version_ 1782234132747649024
author Eikeland Husebø, Sissel I
Bjørshol, Conrad A
Rystedt, Hans
Friberg, Febe
Søreide, Eldar
author_facet Eikeland Husebø, Sissel I
Bjørshol, Conrad A
Rystedt, Hans
Friberg, Febe
Søreide, Eldar
author_sort Eikeland Husebø, Sissel I
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although nurses must be able to respond quickly and effectively to cardiac arrest, numerous studies have demonstrated poor performance. Simulation is a promising learning tool for resuscitation team training but there are few studies that examine simulation for training defibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (D-CPR) in teams from the nursing education perspective. The aim of this study was to investigate the extent to which nursing student teams follow the D-CPR-algorithm in a simulated cardiac arrest, and if observing a simulated cardiac arrest scenario and participating in the post simulation debriefing would improve team performance. METHODS: We studied video-recorded simulations of D-CPR performance in 28 nursing student teams. Besides describing the overall performance of D-CPR, we compared D-CPR performance in two groups. Group A (n = 14) performed D-CPR in a simulated cardiac arrest scenario, while Group B (n = 14) performed D-CPR after first observing performance of Group A and participating in the debriefing. We developed a D-CPR checklist to assess team performance. RESULTS: Overall there were large variations in how accurately the nursing student teams performed the specific parts of the D-CPR algorithm. While few teams performed opening the airways and examination of breathing correctly, all teams used a 30:2 compression: ventilation ratio. We found no difference between Group A and Group B in D-CPR performance, either in regard to total points on the check list or to time variables. CONCLUSION: We found that none of the nursing student teams achieved top scores on the D-CPR-checklist. Observing the training of other teams did not increase subsequent performance. We think all this indicates that more time must be assigned for repetitive practice and reflection. Moreover, the most important aspects of D-CPR, such as early defibrillation and hands-off time in relation to shock, must be highlighted in team-training of nursing students.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3361478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33614782012-06-01 A comparative study of defibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance during simulated cardiac arrest in nursing student teams Eikeland Husebø, Sissel I Bjørshol, Conrad A Rystedt, Hans Friberg, Febe Søreide, Eldar Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Although nurses must be able to respond quickly and effectively to cardiac arrest, numerous studies have demonstrated poor performance. Simulation is a promising learning tool for resuscitation team training but there are few studies that examine simulation for training defibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (D-CPR) in teams from the nursing education perspective. The aim of this study was to investigate the extent to which nursing student teams follow the D-CPR-algorithm in a simulated cardiac arrest, and if observing a simulated cardiac arrest scenario and participating in the post simulation debriefing would improve team performance. METHODS: We studied video-recorded simulations of D-CPR performance in 28 nursing student teams. Besides describing the overall performance of D-CPR, we compared D-CPR performance in two groups. Group A (n = 14) performed D-CPR in a simulated cardiac arrest scenario, while Group B (n = 14) performed D-CPR after first observing performance of Group A and participating in the debriefing. We developed a D-CPR checklist to assess team performance. RESULTS: Overall there were large variations in how accurately the nursing student teams performed the specific parts of the D-CPR algorithm. While few teams performed opening the airways and examination of breathing correctly, all teams used a 30:2 compression: ventilation ratio. We found no difference between Group A and Group B in D-CPR performance, either in regard to total points on the check list or to time variables. CONCLUSION: We found that none of the nursing student teams achieved top scores on the D-CPR-checklist. Observing the training of other teams did not increase subsequent performance. We think all this indicates that more time must be assigned for repetitive practice and reflection. Moreover, the most important aspects of D-CPR, such as early defibrillation and hands-off time in relation to shock, must be highlighted in team-training of nursing students. BioMed Central 2012-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3361478/ /pubmed/22472128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-20-23 Text en Copyright ©2012 Husebø et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Eikeland Husebø, Sissel I
Bjørshol, Conrad A
Rystedt, Hans
Friberg, Febe
Søreide, Eldar
A comparative study of defibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance during simulated cardiac arrest in nursing student teams
title A comparative study of defibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance during simulated cardiac arrest in nursing student teams
title_full A comparative study of defibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance during simulated cardiac arrest in nursing student teams
title_fullStr A comparative study of defibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance during simulated cardiac arrest in nursing student teams
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of defibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance during simulated cardiac arrest in nursing student teams
title_short A comparative study of defibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance during simulated cardiac arrest in nursing student teams
title_sort comparative study of defibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance during simulated cardiac arrest in nursing student teams
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3361478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22472128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-20-23
work_keys_str_mv AT eikelandhusebøsisseli acomparativestudyofdefibrillationandcardiopulmonaryresuscitationperformanceduringsimulatedcardiacarrestinnursingstudentteams
AT bjørsholconrada acomparativestudyofdefibrillationandcardiopulmonaryresuscitationperformanceduringsimulatedcardiacarrestinnursingstudentteams
AT rystedthans acomparativestudyofdefibrillationandcardiopulmonaryresuscitationperformanceduringsimulatedcardiacarrestinnursingstudentteams
AT fribergfebe acomparativestudyofdefibrillationandcardiopulmonaryresuscitationperformanceduringsimulatedcardiacarrestinnursingstudentteams
AT søreideeldar acomparativestudyofdefibrillationandcardiopulmonaryresuscitationperformanceduringsimulatedcardiacarrestinnursingstudentteams
AT eikelandhusebøsisseli comparativestudyofdefibrillationandcardiopulmonaryresuscitationperformanceduringsimulatedcardiacarrestinnursingstudentteams
AT bjørsholconrada comparativestudyofdefibrillationandcardiopulmonaryresuscitationperformanceduringsimulatedcardiacarrestinnursingstudentteams
AT rystedthans comparativestudyofdefibrillationandcardiopulmonaryresuscitationperformanceduringsimulatedcardiacarrestinnursingstudentteams
AT fribergfebe comparativestudyofdefibrillationandcardiopulmonaryresuscitationperformanceduringsimulatedcardiacarrestinnursingstudentteams
AT søreideeldar comparativestudyofdefibrillationandcardiopulmonaryresuscitationperformanceduringsimulatedcardiacarrestinnursingstudentteams