Cargando…

The problem of low variance voxels in statistical parametric mapping; a new hat avoids a ‘haircut’

Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) locates significant clusters based on a ratio of signal to noise (a ‘contrast’ of the parameters divided by its standard error) meaning that very low noise regions, for example outside the brain, can attain artefactually high statistical values. Similarly, the co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ridgway, Gerard R., Litvak, Vladimir, Flandin, Guillaume, Friston, Karl J., Penny, Will D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3361668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22037420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.027
_version_ 1782234139206877184
author Ridgway, Gerard R.
Litvak, Vladimir
Flandin, Guillaume
Friston, Karl J.
Penny, Will D.
author_facet Ridgway, Gerard R.
Litvak, Vladimir
Flandin, Guillaume
Friston, Karl J.
Penny, Will D.
author_sort Ridgway, Gerard R.
collection PubMed
description Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) locates significant clusters based on a ratio of signal to noise (a ‘contrast’ of the parameters divided by its standard error) meaning that very low noise regions, for example outside the brain, can attain artefactually high statistical values. Similarly, the commonly applied preprocessing step of Gaussian spatial smoothing can shift the peak statistical significance away from the peak of the contrast and towards regions of lower variance. These problems have previously been identified in positron emission tomography (PET) (Reimold et al., 2006) and voxel-based morphometry (VBM) (Acosta-Cabronero et al., 2008), but can also appear in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies. Additionally, for source-reconstructed magneto- and electro-encephalography (M/EEG), the problems are particularly severe because sparsity-favouring priors constrain meaningfully large signal and variance to a small set of compactly supported regions within the brain. (Acosta-Cabronero et al., 2008) suggested adding noise to background voxels (the ‘haircut’), effectively increasing their noise variance, but at the cost of contaminating neighbouring regions with the added noise once smoothed. Following theory and simulations, we propose to modify – directly and solely – the noise variance estimate, and investigate this solution on real imaging data from a range of modalities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3361668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Academic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33616682012-05-31 The problem of low variance voxels in statistical parametric mapping; a new hat avoids a ‘haircut’ Ridgway, Gerard R. Litvak, Vladimir Flandin, Guillaume Friston, Karl J. Penny, Will D. Neuroimage Technical Note Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) locates significant clusters based on a ratio of signal to noise (a ‘contrast’ of the parameters divided by its standard error) meaning that very low noise regions, for example outside the brain, can attain artefactually high statistical values. Similarly, the commonly applied preprocessing step of Gaussian spatial smoothing can shift the peak statistical significance away from the peak of the contrast and towards regions of lower variance. These problems have previously been identified in positron emission tomography (PET) (Reimold et al., 2006) and voxel-based morphometry (VBM) (Acosta-Cabronero et al., 2008), but can also appear in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies. Additionally, for source-reconstructed magneto- and electro-encephalography (M/EEG), the problems are particularly severe because sparsity-favouring priors constrain meaningfully large signal and variance to a small set of compactly supported regions within the brain. (Acosta-Cabronero et al., 2008) suggested adding noise to background voxels (the ‘haircut’), effectively increasing their noise variance, but at the cost of contaminating neighbouring regions with the added noise once smoothed. Following theory and simulations, we propose to modify – directly and solely – the noise variance estimate, and investigate this solution on real imaging data from a range of modalities. Academic Press 2012-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3361668/ /pubmed/22037420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.027 Text en © 2012 Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) license
spellingShingle Technical Note
Ridgway, Gerard R.
Litvak, Vladimir
Flandin, Guillaume
Friston, Karl J.
Penny, Will D.
The problem of low variance voxels in statistical parametric mapping; a new hat avoids a ‘haircut’
title The problem of low variance voxels in statistical parametric mapping; a new hat avoids a ‘haircut’
title_full The problem of low variance voxels in statistical parametric mapping; a new hat avoids a ‘haircut’
title_fullStr The problem of low variance voxels in statistical parametric mapping; a new hat avoids a ‘haircut’
title_full_unstemmed The problem of low variance voxels in statistical parametric mapping; a new hat avoids a ‘haircut’
title_short The problem of low variance voxels in statistical parametric mapping; a new hat avoids a ‘haircut’
title_sort problem of low variance voxels in statistical parametric mapping; a new hat avoids a ‘haircut’
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3361668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22037420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.027
work_keys_str_mv AT ridgwaygerardr theproblemoflowvariancevoxelsinstatisticalparametricmappinganewhatavoidsahaircut
AT litvakvladimir theproblemoflowvariancevoxelsinstatisticalparametricmappinganewhatavoidsahaircut
AT flandinguillaume theproblemoflowvariancevoxelsinstatisticalparametricmappinganewhatavoidsahaircut
AT fristonkarlj theproblemoflowvariancevoxelsinstatisticalparametricmappinganewhatavoidsahaircut
AT pennywilld theproblemoflowvariancevoxelsinstatisticalparametricmappinganewhatavoidsahaircut
AT ridgwaygerardr problemoflowvariancevoxelsinstatisticalparametricmappinganewhatavoidsahaircut
AT litvakvladimir problemoflowvariancevoxelsinstatisticalparametricmappinganewhatavoidsahaircut
AT flandinguillaume problemoflowvariancevoxelsinstatisticalparametricmappinganewhatavoidsahaircut
AT fristonkarlj problemoflowvariancevoxelsinstatisticalparametricmappinganewhatavoidsahaircut
AT pennywilld problemoflowvariancevoxelsinstatisticalparametricmappinganewhatavoidsahaircut