Cargando…
The problem of low variance voxels in statistical parametric mapping; a new hat avoids a ‘haircut’
Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) locates significant clusters based on a ratio of signal to noise (a ‘contrast’ of the parameters divided by its standard error) meaning that very low noise regions, for example outside the brain, can attain artefactually high statistical values. Similarly, the co...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Academic Press
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3361668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22037420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.027 |
_version_ | 1782234139206877184 |
---|---|
author | Ridgway, Gerard R. Litvak, Vladimir Flandin, Guillaume Friston, Karl J. Penny, Will D. |
author_facet | Ridgway, Gerard R. Litvak, Vladimir Flandin, Guillaume Friston, Karl J. Penny, Will D. |
author_sort | Ridgway, Gerard R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) locates significant clusters based on a ratio of signal to noise (a ‘contrast’ of the parameters divided by its standard error) meaning that very low noise regions, for example outside the brain, can attain artefactually high statistical values. Similarly, the commonly applied preprocessing step of Gaussian spatial smoothing can shift the peak statistical significance away from the peak of the contrast and towards regions of lower variance. These problems have previously been identified in positron emission tomography (PET) (Reimold et al., 2006) and voxel-based morphometry (VBM) (Acosta-Cabronero et al., 2008), but can also appear in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies. Additionally, for source-reconstructed magneto- and electro-encephalography (M/EEG), the problems are particularly severe because sparsity-favouring priors constrain meaningfully large signal and variance to a small set of compactly supported regions within the brain. (Acosta-Cabronero et al., 2008) suggested adding noise to background voxels (the ‘haircut’), effectively increasing their noise variance, but at the cost of contaminating neighbouring regions with the added noise once smoothed. Following theory and simulations, we propose to modify – directly and solely – the noise variance estimate, and investigate this solution on real imaging data from a range of modalities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3361668 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Academic Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33616682012-05-31 The problem of low variance voxels in statistical parametric mapping; a new hat avoids a ‘haircut’ Ridgway, Gerard R. Litvak, Vladimir Flandin, Guillaume Friston, Karl J. Penny, Will D. Neuroimage Technical Note Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) locates significant clusters based on a ratio of signal to noise (a ‘contrast’ of the parameters divided by its standard error) meaning that very low noise regions, for example outside the brain, can attain artefactually high statistical values. Similarly, the commonly applied preprocessing step of Gaussian spatial smoothing can shift the peak statistical significance away from the peak of the contrast and towards regions of lower variance. These problems have previously been identified in positron emission tomography (PET) (Reimold et al., 2006) and voxel-based morphometry (VBM) (Acosta-Cabronero et al., 2008), but can also appear in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies. Additionally, for source-reconstructed magneto- and electro-encephalography (M/EEG), the problems are particularly severe because sparsity-favouring priors constrain meaningfully large signal and variance to a small set of compactly supported regions within the brain. (Acosta-Cabronero et al., 2008) suggested adding noise to background voxels (the ‘haircut’), effectively increasing their noise variance, but at the cost of contaminating neighbouring regions with the added noise once smoothed. Following theory and simulations, we propose to modify – directly and solely – the noise variance estimate, and investigate this solution on real imaging data from a range of modalities. Academic Press 2012-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3361668/ /pubmed/22037420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.027 Text en © 2012 Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) license |
spellingShingle | Technical Note Ridgway, Gerard R. Litvak, Vladimir Flandin, Guillaume Friston, Karl J. Penny, Will D. The problem of low variance voxels in statistical parametric mapping; a new hat avoids a ‘haircut’ |
title | The problem of low variance voxels in statistical parametric mapping; a new hat avoids a ‘haircut’ |
title_full | The problem of low variance voxels in statistical parametric mapping; a new hat avoids a ‘haircut’ |
title_fullStr | The problem of low variance voxels in statistical parametric mapping; a new hat avoids a ‘haircut’ |
title_full_unstemmed | The problem of low variance voxels in statistical parametric mapping; a new hat avoids a ‘haircut’ |
title_short | The problem of low variance voxels in statistical parametric mapping; a new hat avoids a ‘haircut’ |
title_sort | problem of low variance voxels in statistical parametric mapping; a new hat avoids a ‘haircut’ |
topic | Technical Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3361668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22037420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ridgwaygerardr theproblemoflowvariancevoxelsinstatisticalparametricmappinganewhatavoidsahaircut AT litvakvladimir theproblemoflowvariancevoxelsinstatisticalparametricmappinganewhatavoidsahaircut AT flandinguillaume theproblemoflowvariancevoxelsinstatisticalparametricmappinganewhatavoidsahaircut AT fristonkarlj theproblemoflowvariancevoxelsinstatisticalparametricmappinganewhatavoidsahaircut AT pennywilld theproblemoflowvariancevoxelsinstatisticalparametricmappinganewhatavoidsahaircut AT ridgwaygerardr problemoflowvariancevoxelsinstatisticalparametricmappinganewhatavoidsahaircut AT litvakvladimir problemoflowvariancevoxelsinstatisticalparametricmappinganewhatavoidsahaircut AT flandinguillaume problemoflowvariancevoxelsinstatisticalparametricmappinganewhatavoidsahaircut AT fristonkarlj problemoflowvariancevoxelsinstatisticalparametricmappinganewhatavoidsahaircut AT pennywilld problemoflowvariancevoxelsinstatisticalparametricmappinganewhatavoidsahaircut |