Cargando…

Evaluation of Distinct Freezing Methods and Cryoprotectants for Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells Cryopreservation

Amniotic fluid (AF) was described as a potential source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for biomedicine purposes. Therefore, evaluation of alternative cryoprotectants and freezing protocols capable to maintain the viability and stemness of these cells after cooling is still needed. AF stem cells (A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janz, Felipe de Lara, Debes, Adriana de Aguiar, Cavaglieri, Rita de Cássia, Duarte, Sérgio Aloísio, Romão, Carolina Martinez, Morón, Antonio Fernandes, Zugaib, Marcelo, Bydlowski, Sérgio Paulo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3361720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22665987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/649353
_version_ 1782234142369382400
author Janz, Felipe de Lara
Debes, Adriana de Aguiar
Cavaglieri, Rita de Cássia
Duarte, Sérgio Aloísio
Romão, Carolina Martinez
Morón, Antonio Fernandes
Zugaib, Marcelo
Bydlowski, Sérgio Paulo
author_facet Janz, Felipe de Lara
Debes, Adriana de Aguiar
Cavaglieri, Rita de Cássia
Duarte, Sérgio Aloísio
Romão, Carolina Martinez
Morón, Antonio Fernandes
Zugaib, Marcelo
Bydlowski, Sérgio Paulo
author_sort Janz, Felipe de Lara
collection PubMed
description Amniotic fluid (AF) was described as a potential source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for biomedicine purposes. Therefore, evaluation of alternative cryoprotectants and freezing protocols capable to maintain the viability and stemness of these cells after cooling is still needed. AF stem cells (AFSCs) were tested for different freezing methods and cryoprotectants. Cell viability, gene expression, surface markers, and plasticity were evaluated after thawing. AFSCs expressed undifferentiated genes Oct4 and Nanog; presented typical markers (CD29, CD44, CD90, and CD105) and were able to differentiate into mesenchymal lineages. All tested cryoprotectants preserved the features of AFSCs however, variations in cell viability were observed. In this concern, dimethyl sulfoxide (Me(2)SO) showed the best results. The freezing protocols tested did not promote significant changes in the AFSCs viability. Time programmed and nonprogrammed freezing methods could be used for successful AFSCs cryopreservation for 6 months. Although tested cryoprotectants maintained undifferentiated gene expression, typical markers, and plasticity of AFSCs, only Me(2)SO and glycerol presented workable viability ratios.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3361720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33617202012-06-04 Evaluation of Distinct Freezing Methods and Cryoprotectants for Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells Cryopreservation Janz, Felipe de Lara Debes, Adriana de Aguiar Cavaglieri, Rita de Cássia Duarte, Sérgio Aloísio Romão, Carolina Martinez Morón, Antonio Fernandes Zugaib, Marcelo Bydlowski, Sérgio Paulo J Biomed Biotechnol Research Article Amniotic fluid (AF) was described as a potential source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for biomedicine purposes. Therefore, evaluation of alternative cryoprotectants and freezing protocols capable to maintain the viability and stemness of these cells after cooling is still needed. AF stem cells (AFSCs) were tested for different freezing methods and cryoprotectants. Cell viability, gene expression, surface markers, and plasticity were evaluated after thawing. AFSCs expressed undifferentiated genes Oct4 and Nanog; presented typical markers (CD29, CD44, CD90, and CD105) and were able to differentiate into mesenchymal lineages. All tested cryoprotectants preserved the features of AFSCs however, variations in cell viability were observed. In this concern, dimethyl sulfoxide (Me(2)SO) showed the best results. The freezing protocols tested did not promote significant changes in the AFSCs viability. Time programmed and nonprogrammed freezing methods could be used for successful AFSCs cryopreservation for 6 months. Although tested cryoprotectants maintained undifferentiated gene expression, typical markers, and plasticity of AFSCs, only Me(2)SO and glycerol presented workable viability ratios. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3361720/ /pubmed/22665987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/649353 Text en Copyright © 2012 Felipe de Lara Janz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Janz, Felipe de Lara
Debes, Adriana de Aguiar
Cavaglieri, Rita de Cássia
Duarte, Sérgio Aloísio
Romão, Carolina Martinez
Morón, Antonio Fernandes
Zugaib, Marcelo
Bydlowski, Sérgio Paulo
Evaluation of Distinct Freezing Methods and Cryoprotectants for Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells Cryopreservation
title Evaluation of Distinct Freezing Methods and Cryoprotectants for Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells Cryopreservation
title_full Evaluation of Distinct Freezing Methods and Cryoprotectants for Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells Cryopreservation
title_fullStr Evaluation of Distinct Freezing Methods and Cryoprotectants for Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells Cryopreservation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Distinct Freezing Methods and Cryoprotectants for Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells Cryopreservation
title_short Evaluation of Distinct Freezing Methods and Cryoprotectants for Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells Cryopreservation
title_sort evaluation of distinct freezing methods and cryoprotectants for human amniotic fluid stem cells cryopreservation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3361720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22665987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/649353
work_keys_str_mv AT janzfelipedelara evaluationofdistinctfreezingmethodsandcryoprotectantsforhumanamnioticfluidstemcellscryopreservation
AT debesadrianadeaguiar evaluationofdistinctfreezingmethodsandcryoprotectantsforhumanamnioticfluidstemcellscryopreservation
AT cavaglieriritadecassia evaluationofdistinctfreezingmethodsandcryoprotectantsforhumanamnioticfluidstemcellscryopreservation
AT duartesergioaloisio evaluationofdistinctfreezingmethodsandcryoprotectantsforhumanamnioticfluidstemcellscryopreservation
AT romaocarolinamartinez evaluationofdistinctfreezingmethodsandcryoprotectantsforhumanamnioticfluidstemcellscryopreservation
AT moronantoniofernandes evaluationofdistinctfreezingmethodsandcryoprotectantsforhumanamnioticfluidstemcellscryopreservation
AT zugaibmarcelo evaluationofdistinctfreezingmethodsandcryoprotectantsforhumanamnioticfluidstemcellscryopreservation
AT bydlowskisergiopaulo evaluationofdistinctfreezingmethodsandcryoprotectantsforhumanamnioticfluidstemcellscryopreservation