Cargando…
Evaluation of Distinct Freezing Methods and Cryoprotectants for Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells Cryopreservation
Amniotic fluid (AF) was described as a potential source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for biomedicine purposes. Therefore, evaluation of alternative cryoprotectants and freezing protocols capable to maintain the viability and stemness of these cells after cooling is still needed. AF stem cells (A...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3361720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22665987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/649353 |
_version_ | 1782234142369382400 |
---|---|
author | Janz, Felipe de Lara Debes, Adriana de Aguiar Cavaglieri, Rita de Cássia Duarte, Sérgio Aloísio Romão, Carolina Martinez Morón, Antonio Fernandes Zugaib, Marcelo Bydlowski, Sérgio Paulo |
author_facet | Janz, Felipe de Lara Debes, Adriana de Aguiar Cavaglieri, Rita de Cássia Duarte, Sérgio Aloísio Romão, Carolina Martinez Morón, Antonio Fernandes Zugaib, Marcelo Bydlowski, Sérgio Paulo |
author_sort | Janz, Felipe de Lara |
collection | PubMed |
description | Amniotic fluid (AF) was described as a potential source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for biomedicine purposes. Therefore, evaluation of alternative cryoprotectants and freezing protocols capable to maintain the viability and stemness of these cells after cooling is still needed. AF stem cells (AFSCs) were tested for different freezing methods and cryoprotectants. Cell viability, gene expression, surface markers, and plasticity were evaluated after thawing. AFSCs expressed undifferentiated genes Oct4 and Nanog; presented typical markers (CD29, CD44, CD90, and CD105) and were able to differentiate into mesenchymal lineages. All tested cryoprotectants preserved the features of AFSCs however, variations in cell viability were observed. In this concern, dimethyl sulfoxide (Me(2)SO) showed the best results. The freezing protocols tested did not promote significant changes in the AFSCs viability. Time programmed and nonprogrammed freezing methods could be used for successful AFSCs cryopreservation for 6 months. Although tested cryoprotectants maintained undifferentiated gene expression, typical markers, and plasticity of AFSCs, only Me(2)SO and glycerol presented workable viability ratios. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3361720 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33617202012-06-04 Evaluation of Distinct Freezing Methods and Cryoprotectants for Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells Cryopreservation Janz, Felipe de Lara Debes, Adriana de Aguiar Cavaglieri, Rita de Cássia Duarte, Sérgio Aloísio Romão, Carolina Martinez Morón, Antonio Fernandes Zugaib, Marcelo Bydlowski, Sérgio Paulo J Biomed Biotechnol Research Article Amniotic fluid (AF) was described as a potential source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for biomedicine purposes. Therefore, evaluation of alternative cryoprotectants and freezing protocols capable to maintain the viability and stemness of these cells after cooling is still needed. AF stem cells (AFSCs) were tested for different freezing methods and cryoprotectants. Cell viability, gene expression, surface markers, and plasticity were evaluated after thawing. AFSCs expressed undifferentiated genes Oct4 and Nanog; presented typical markers (CD29, CD44, CD90, and CD105) and were able to differentiate into mesenchymal lineages. All tested cryoprotectants preserved the features of AFSCs however, variations in cell viability were observed. In this concern, dimethyl sulfoxide (Me(2)SO) showed the best results. The freezing protocols tested did not promote significant changes in the AFSCs viability. Time programmed and nonprogrammed freezing methods could be used for successful AFSCs cryopreservation for 6 months. Although tested cryoprotectants maintained undifferentiated gene expression, typical markers, and plasticity of AFSCs, only Me(2)SO and glycerol presented workable viability ratios. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3361720/ /pubmed/22665987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/649353 Text en Copyright © 2012 Felipe de Lara Janz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Janz, Felipe de Lara Debes, Adriana de Aguiar Cavaglieri, Rita de Cássia Duarte, Sérgio Aloísio Romão, Carolina Martinez Morón, Antonio Fernandes Zugaib, Marcelo Bydlowski, Sérgio Paulo Evaluation of Distinct Freezing Methods and Cryoprotectants for Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells Cryopreservation |
title | Evaluation of Distinct Freezing Methods and Cryoprotectants for Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells Cryopreservation |
title_full | Evaluation of Distinct Freezing Methods and Cryoprotectants for Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells Cryopreservation |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Distinct Freezing Methods and Cryoprotectants for Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells Cryopreservation |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Distinct Freezing Methods and Cryoprotectants for Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells Cryopreservation |
title_short | Evaluation of Distinct Freezing Methods and Cryoprotectants for Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells Cryopreservation |
title_sort | evaluation of distinct freezing methods and cryoprotectants for human amniotic fluid stem cells cryopreservation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3361720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22665987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/649353 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT janzfelipedelara evaluationofdistinctfreezingmethodsandcryoprotectantsforhumanamnioticfluidstemcellscryopreservation AT debesadrianadeaguiar evaluationofdistinctfreezingmethodsandcryoprotectantsforhumanamnioticfluidstemcellscryopreservation AT cavaglieriritadecassia evaluationofdistinctfreezingmethodsandcryoprotectantsforhumanamnioticfluidstemcellscryopreservation AT duartesergioaloisio evaluationofdistinctfreezingmethodsandcryoprotectantsforhumanamnioticfluidstemcellscryopreservation AT romaocarolinamartinez evaluationofdistinctfreezingmethodsandcryoprotectantsforhumanamnioticfluidstemcellscryopreservation AT moronantoniofernandes evaluationofdistinctfreezingmethodsandcryoprotectantsforhumanamnioticfluidstemcellscryopreservation AT zugaibmarcelo evaluationofdistinctfreezingmethodsandcryoprotectantsforhumanamnioticfluidstemcellscryopreservation AT bydlowskisergiopaulo evaluationofdistinctfreezingmethodsandcryoprotectantsforhumanamnioticfluidstemcellscryopreservation |