Cargando…

In vivo Importance of Homologous Recombination DNA Repair for Mouse Neural Stem and Progenitor Cells

We characterized the in vivo importance of the homologous recombination factor RAD54 for the developing mouse brain cortex in normal conditions or after ionizing radiation exposure. Contrary to numerous homologous recombination genes, Rad54 disruption did not impact the cortical development without...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rousseau, Laure, Etienne, Olivier, Roque, Telma, Desmaze, Chantal, Haton, Céline, Mouthon, Marc-André, Bernardino-Sgherri, Jacqueline, Essers, Jeroen, Kanaar, Roland, Boussin, François D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3362579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22666344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037194
_version_ 1782234227580862464
author Rousseau, Laure
Etienne, Olivier
Roque, Telma
Desmaze, Chantal
Haton, Céline
Mouthon, Marc-André
Bernardino-Sgherri, Jacqueline
Essers, Jeroen
Kanaar, Roland
Boussin, François D.
author_facet Rousseau, Laure
Etienne, Olivier
Roque, Telma
Desmaze, Chantal
Haton, Céline
Mouthon, Marc-André
Bernardino-Sgherri, Jacqueline
Essers, Jeroen
Kanaar, Roland
Boussin, François D.
author_sort Rousseau, Laure
collection PubMed
description We characterized the in vivo importance of the homologous recombination factor RAD54 for the developing mouse brain cortex in normal conditions or after ionizing radiation exposure. Contrary to numerous homologous recombination genes, Rad54 disruption did not impact the cortical development without exogenous stress, but it dramatically enhanced the radiation sensitivity of neural stem and progenitor cells. This resulted in the death of all cells irradiated during S or G2, whereas the viability of cells irradiated in G1 or G0 was not affected by Rad54 disruption. Apoptosis occurred after long arrests at intra-S and G2/M checkpoints. This concerned every type of neural stem and progenitor cells, showing that the importance of Rad54 for radiation response was linked to the cell cycle phase at the time of irradiation and not to the differentiation state. In the developing brain, RAD54-dependent homologous recombination appeared absolutely required for the repair of damages induced by ionizing radiation during S and G2 phases, but not for the repair of endogenous damages in normal conditions. Altogether our data support the existence of RAD54-dependent and -independent homologous recombination pathways.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3362579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33625792012-06-04 In vivo Importance of Homologous Recombination DNA Repair for Mouse Neural Stem and Progenitor Cells Rousseau, Laure Etienne, Olivier Roque, Telma Desmaze, Chantal Haton, Céline Mouthon, Marc-André Bernardino-Sgherri, Jacqueline Essers, Jeroen Kanaar, Roland Boussin, François D. PLoS One Research Article We characterized the in vivo importance of the homologous recombination factor RAD54 for the developing mouse brain cortex in normal conditions or after ionizing radiation exposure. Contrary to numerous homologous recombination genes, Rad54 disruption did not impact the cortical development without exogenous stress, but it dramatically enhanced the radiation sensitivity of neural stem and progenitor cells. This resulted in the death of all cells irradiated during S or G2, whereas the viability of cells irradiated in G1 or G0 was not affected by Rad54 disruption. Apoptosis occurred after long arrests at intra-S and G2/M checkpoints. This concerned every type of neural stem and progenitor cells, showing that the importance of Rad54 for radiation response was linked to the cell cycle phase at the time of irradiation and not to the differentiation state. In the developing brain, RAD54-dependent homologous recombination appeared absolutely required for the repair of damages induced by ionizing radiation during S and G2 phases, but not for the repair of endogenous damages in normal conditions. Altogether our data support the existence of RAD54-dependent and -independent homologous recombination pathways. Public Library of Science 2012-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3362579/ /pubmed/22666344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037194 Text en Rousseau et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rousseau, Laure
Etienne, Olivier
Roque, Telma
Desmaze, Chantal
Haton, Céline
Mouthon, Marc-André
Bernardino-Sgherri, Jacqueline
Essers, Jeroen
Kanaar, Roland
Boussin, François D.
In vivo Importance of Homologous Recombination DNA Repair for Mouse Neural Stem and Progenitor Cells
title In vivo Importance of Homologous Recombination DNA Repair for Mouse Neural Stem and Progenitor Cells
title_full In vivo Importance of Homologous Recombination DNA Repair for Mouse Neural Stem and Progenitor Cells
title_fullStr In vivo Importance of Homologous Recombination DNA Repair for Mouse Neural Stem and Progenitor Cells
title_full_unstemmed In vivo Importance of Homologous Recombination DNA Repair for Mouse Neural Stem and Progenitor Cells
title_short In vivo Importance of Homologous Recombination DNA Repair for Mouse Neural Stem and Progenitor Cells
title_sort in vivo importance of homologous recombination dna repair for mouse neural stem and progenitor cells
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3362579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22666344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037194
work_keys_str_mv AT rousseaulaure invivoimportanceofhomologousrecombinationdnarepairformouseneuralstemandprogenitorcells
AT etienneolivier invivoimportanceofhomologousrecombinationdnarepairformouseneuralstemandprogenitorcells
AT roquetelma invivoimportanceofhomologousrecombinationdnarepairformouseneuralstemandprogenitorcells
AT desmazechantal invivoimportanceofhomologousrecombinationdnarepairformouseneuralstemandprogenitorcells
AT hatonceline invivoimportanceofhomologousrecombinationdnarepairformouseneuralstemandprogenitorcells
AT mouthonmarcandre invivoimportanceofhomologousrecombinationdnarepairformouseneuralstemandprogenitorcells
AT bernardinosgherrijacqueline invivoimportanceofhomologousrecombinationdnarepairformouseneuralstemandprogenitorcells
AT essersjeroen invivoimportanceofhomologousrecombinationdnarepairformouseneuralstemandprogenitorcells
AT kanaarroland invivoimportanceofhomologousrecombinationdnarepairformouseneuralstemandprogenitorcells
AT boussinfrancoisd invivoimportanceofhomologousrecombinationdnarepairformouseneuralstemandprogenitorcells