Cargando…

Prior and Present Evidence: How Prior Experience Interacts with Present Information in a Perceptual Decision Making Task

BACKGROUND: Vibrotactile discrimination tasks have been used to examine decision making processes in the presence of perceptual uncertainty, induced by barely discernible frequency differences between paired stimuli or by the presence of embedded noise. One lesser known property of such tasks is tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karim, Muhsin, Harris, Justin A., Morley, John W., Breakspear, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3362626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22701521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037580
_version_ 1782234235861467136
author Karim, Muhsin
Harris, Justin A.
Morley, John W.
Breakspear, Michael
author_facet Karim, Muhsin
Harris, Justin A.
Morley, John W.
Breakspear, Michael
author_sort Karim, Muhsin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vibrotactile discrimination tasks have been used to examine decision making processes in the presence of perceptual uncertainty, induced by barely discernible frequency differences between paired stimuli or by the presence of embedded noise. One lesser known property of such tasks is that decisions made on a single trial may be biased by information from prior trials. An example is the time-order effect whereby the presentation order of paired stimuli may introduce differences in accuracy. Subjects perform better when the first stimulus lies between the second stimulus and the global mean of all stimuli on the judged dimension (“preferred” time-orders) compared to the alternative presentation order (“nonpreferred” time-orders). This has been conceptualised as a “drift” of the first stimulus representation towards the global mean of the stimulus-set (an internal standard). We describe the influence of prior information in relation to the more traditionally studied factors of interest in a classic discrimination task. METHODOLOGY: Sixty subjects performed a vibrotactile discrimination task with different levels of uncertainty parametrically induced by increasing task difficulty, aperiodic stimulus noise, and changing the task instructions whilst maintaining identical stimulus properties (the “context”). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The time-order effect had a greater influence on task performance than two of the explicit factors–task difficulty and noise–but not context. The influence of prior information increased with the distance of the first stimulus from the global mean, suggesting that the “drift” velocity of the first stimulus towards the global mean representation was greater for these trials. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Awareness of the time-order effect and prior information in general is essential when studying perceptual decision making tasks. Implicit mechanisms may have a greater influence than the explicit factors under study. It also affords valuable insights into basic mechanisms of information accumulation, storage, sensory weighting, and processing in neural circuits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3362626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33626262012-06-14 Prior and Present Evidence: How Prior Experience Interacts with Present Information in a Perceptual Decision Making Task Karim, Muhsin Harris, Justin A. Morley, John W. Breakspear, Michael PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Vibrotactile discrimination tasks have been used to examine decision making processes in the presence of perceptual uncertainty, induced by barely discernible frequency differences between paired stimuli or by the presence of embedded noise. One lesser known property of such tasks is that decisions made on a single trial may be biased by information from prior trials. An example is the time-order effect whereby the presentation order of paired stimuli may introduce differences in accuracy. Subjects perform better when the first stimulus lies between the second stimulus and the global mean of all stimuli on the judged dimension (“preferred” time-orders) compared to the alternative presentation order (“nonpreferred” time-orders). This has been conceptualised as a “drift” of the first stimulus representation towards the global mean of the stimulus-set (an internal standard). We describe the influence of prior information in relation to the more traditionally studied factors of interest in a classic discrimination task. METHODOLOGY: Sixty subjects performed a vibrotactile discrimination task with different levels of uncertainty parametrically induced by increasing task difficulty, aperiodic stimulus noise, and changing the task instructions whilst maintaining identical stimulus properties (the “context”). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The time-order effect had a greater influence on task performance than two of the explicit factors–task difficulty and noise–but not context. The influence of prior information increased with the distance of the first stimulus from the global mean, suggesting that the “drift” velocity of the first stimulus towards the global mean representation was greater for these trials. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Awareness of the time-order effect and prior information in general is essential when studying perceptual decision making tasks. Implicit mechanisms may have a greater influence than the explicit factors under study. It also affords valuable insights into basic mechanisms of information accumulation, storage, sensory weighting, and processing in neural circuits. Public Library of Science 2012-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3362626/ /pubmed/22701521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037580 Text en Karim et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Karim, Muhsin
Harris, Justin A.
Morley, John W.
Breakspear, Michael
Prior and Present Evidence: How Prior Experience Interacts with Present Information in a Perceptual Decision Making Task
title Prior and Present Evidence: How Prior Experience Interacts with Present Information in a Perceptual Decision Making Task
title_full Prior and Present Evidence: How Prior Experience Interacts with Present Information in a Perceptual Decision Making Task
title_fullStr Prior and Present Evidence: How Prior Experience Interacts with Present Information in a Perceptual Decision Making Task
title_full_unstemmed Prior and Present Evidence: How Prior Experience Interacts with Present Information in a Perceptual Decision Making Task
title_short Prior and Present Evidence: How Prior Experience Interacts with Present Information in a Perceptual Decision Making Task
title_sort prior and present evidence: how prior experience interacts with present information in a perceptual decision making task
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3362626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22701521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037580
work_keys_str_mv AT karimmuhsin priorandpresentevidencehowpriorexperienceinteractswithpresentinformationinaperceptualdecisionmakingtask
AT harrisjustina priorandpresentevidencehowpriorexperienceinteractswithpresentinformationinaperceptualdecisionmakingtask
AT morleyjohnw priorandpresentevidencehowpriorexperienceinteractswithpresentinformationinaperceptualdecisionmakingtask
AT breakspearmichael priorandpresentevidencehowpriorexperienceinteractswithpresentinformationinaperceptualdecisionmakingtask