Cargando…
Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine with aura: a subgroup analysis of a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study
Migraine with aura affects ~20–30 % of migraineurs and it is much less common than migraine without aura. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of frovatriptan 2.5 mg and zolmitriptan 2.5 mg in the treatment of migraine with aura. Analysis was carried out in a subset of 18 subjects with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Milan
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3362723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22644173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-012-1043-8 |
_version_ | 1782234247045578752 |
---|---|
author | Tullo, Vincenzo Allais, Gianni Curone, Marcella Ferrari, Michel D. Omboni, Stefano Benedetto, Chiara Colombo, Bruno Zava, Dario Bussone, Gennaro |
author_facet | Tullo, Vincenzo Allais, Gianni Curone, Marcella Ferrari, Michel D. Omboni, Stefano Benedetto, Chiara Colombo, Bruno Zava, Dario Bussone, Gennaro |
author_sort | Tullo, Vincenzo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Migraine with aura affects ~20–30 % of migraineurs and it is much less common than migraine without aura. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of frovatriptan 2.5 mg and zolmitriptan 2.5 mg in the treatment of migraine with aura. Analysis was carried out in a subset of 18 subjects with migraine with aura (HIS criteria) out of the 107 enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, cross-over study. According to the study design, each patient had to treat three episodes of migraine in no more than 3 months with one drug, before switching to the other treatment. The rate of pain-free episodes at 2 h was significantly (p < 0.05) larger under frovatriptan (45.8 %) than under zolmitriptan (16.7 %). Pain free at 4 h, pain relief at 2 and 4 h and recurrent episodes were similar between the two treatments, while sustained pain-free episode was significantly (p < 0.05) more frequent during frovatriptan treatment (33.3 vs. 8.3 % zolmitriptan). Our study suggests that frovatriptan is superior to zolmitriptan in the immediate treatment of patients with migraine with aura, and it is capable of maintaining its acute analgesic effect over 48 h. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3362723 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Springer Milan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33627232012-06-13 Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine with aura: a subgroup analysis of a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study Tullo, Vincenzo Allais, Gianni Curone, Marcella Ferrari, Michel D. Omboni, Stefano Benedetto, Chiara Colombo, Bruno Zava, Dario Bussone, Gennaro Neurol Sci Symposium: Open Questions on Migraine Migraine with aura affects ~20–30 % of migraineurs and it is much less common than migraine without aura. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of frovatriptan 2.5 mg and zolmitriptan 2.5 mg in the treatment of migraine with aura. Analysis was carried out in a subset of 18 subjects with migraine with aura (HIS criteria) out of the 107 enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, cross-over study. According to the study design, each patient had to treat three episodes of migraine in no more than 3 months with one drug, before switching to the other treatment. The rate of pain-free episodes at 2 h was significantly (p < 0.05) larger under frovatriptan (45.8 %) than under zolmitriptan (16.7 %). Pain free at 4 h, pain relief at 2 and 4 h and recurrent episodes were similar between the two treatments, while sustained pain-free episode was significantly (p < 0.05) more frequent during frovatriptan treatment (33.3 vs. 8.3 % zolmitriptan). Our study suggests that frovatriptan is superior to zolmitriptan in the immediate treatment of patients with migraine with aura, and it is capable of maintaining its acute analgesic effect over 48 h. Springer Milan 2012-05-30 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3362723/ /pubmed/22644173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-012-1043-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Symposium: Open Questions on Migraine Tullo, Vincenzo Allais, Gianni Curone, Marcella Ferrari, Michel D. Omboni, Stefano Benedetto, Chiara Colombo, Bruno Zava, Dario Bussone, Gennaro Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine with aura: a subgroup analysis of a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study |
title | Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine with aura: a subgroup analysis of a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study |
title_full | Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine with aura: a subgroup analysis of a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study |
title_fullStr | Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine with aura: a subgroup analysis of a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study |
title_full_unstemmed | Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine with aura: a subgroup analysis of a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study |
title_short | Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine with aura: a subgroup analysis of a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study |
title_sort | frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine with aura: a subgroup analysis of a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, italian study |
topic | Symposium: Open Questions on Migraine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3362723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22644173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-012-1043-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tullovincenzo frovatriptanversuszolmitriptanfortheacutetreatmentofmigrainewithauraasubgroupanalysisofadoubleblindrandomizedmulticenteritalianstudy AT allaisgianni frovatriptanversuszolmitriptanfortheacutetreatmentofmigrainewithauraasubgroupanalysisofadoubleblindrandomizedmulticenteritalianstudy AT curonemarcella frovatriptanversuszolmitriptanfortheacutetreatmentofmigrainewithauraasubgroupanalysisofadoubleblindrandomizedmulticenteritalianstudy AT ferrarimicheld frovatriptanversuszolmitriptanfortheacutetreatmentofmigrainewithauraasubgroupanalysisofadoubleblindrandomizedmulticenteritalianstudy AT ombonistefano frovatriptanversuszolmitriptanfortheacutetreatmentofmigrainewithauraasubgroupanalysisofadoubleblindrandomizedmulticenteritalianstudy AT benedettochiara frovatriptanversuszolmitriptanfortheacutetreatmentofmigrainewithauraasubgroupanalysisofadoubleblindrandomizedmulticenteritalianstudy AT colombobruno frovatriptanversuszolmitriptanfortheacutetreatmentofmigrainewithauraasubgroupanalysisofadoubleblindrandomizedmulticenteritalianstudy AT zavadario frovatriptanversuszolmitriptanfortheacutetreatmentofmigrainewithauraasubgroupanalysisofadoubleblindrandomizedmulticenteritalianstudy AT bussonegennaro frovatriptanversuszolmitriptanfortheacutetreatmentofmigrainewithauraasubgroupanalysisofadoubleblindrandomizedmulticenteritalianstudy |