Cargando…
In Vitro Resistance to Macrolides and Clindamycin by Group B Streptococcus Isolated from Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women
Background. Despite the introduction of screening bases intrapartum prophylaxis, Streptococcus agalactiae is still an important etiological agent of perinatal infections. The increasing rate of resistance and the differences in resistance pattern among countries suggest that a program of surveillanc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3362851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22675244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/913603 |
_version_ | 1782234271916752896 |
---|---|
author | Lambiase, Antonietta Agangi, Annalisa Del Pezzo, Mariassunta Quaglia, Filomena Testa, Antonio Rossano, Fabio Martinelli, Pasquale Catania, Maria Rosaria |
author_facet | Lambiase, Antonietta Agangi, Annalisa Del Pezzo, Mariassunta Quaglia, Filomena Testa, Antonio Rossano, Fabio Martinelli, Pasquale Catania, Maria Rosaria |
author_sort | Lambiase, Antonietta |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. Despite the introduction of screening bases intrapartum prophylaxis, Streptococcus agalactiae is still an important etiological agent of perinatal infections. The increasing rate of resistance and the differences in resistance pattern among countries suggest that a program of surveillance at the institutional level is important in determining optimal prophylaxis. In contrast, knowledge on GBS epidemiology in Italy is limited, and no data are available in the Southern region of the country. We sought to determine the occurrence of resistance to macrolides and clindamycin of GBS isolates in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Methods. Between 2005 and 2008, 1346 vaginal and 810 rectovaginal swabs were obtained from pregnant and not-pregnant women. Results. The occurrence of macrolides and clindamycin resistance was 16.5% in 2005 increasing up to 69.9% in 2008. A high percentage of isolates was resistant to tetracycline through all the study period with no statistically significant annual. Conclusions. In our cohort, an increase of in vitro resistance of GBS to macrolides and clindamycin is clearly evident. The discordance with reports from different countries emphasize the crucial role of microbiological methods in setting possible therapeutic strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3362851 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33628512012-06-06 In Vitro Resistance to Macrolides and Clindamycin by Group B Streptococcus Isolated from Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women Lambiase, Antonietta Agangi, Annalisa Del Pezzo, Mariassunta Quaglia, Filomena Testa, Antonio Rossano, Fabio Martinelli, Pasquale Catania, Maria Rosaria Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol Research Article Background. Despite the introduction of screening bases intrapartum prophylaxis, Streptococcus agalactiae is still an important etiological agent of perinatal infections. The increasing rate of resistance and the differences in resistance pattern among countries suggest that a program of surveillance at the institutional level is important in determining optimal prophylaxis. In contrast, knowledge on GBS epidemiology in Italy is limited, and no data are available in the Southern region of the country. We sought to determine the occurrence of resistance to macrolides and clindamycin of GBS isolates in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Methods. Between 2005 and 2008, 1346 vaginal and 810 rectovaginal swabs were obtained from pregnant and not-pregnant women. Results. The occurrence of macrolides and clindamycin resistance was 16.5% in 2005 increasing up to 69.9% in 2008. A high percentage of isolates was resistant to tetracycline through all the study period with no statistically significant annual. Conclusions. In our cohort, an increase of in vitro resistance of GBS to macrolides and clindamycin is clearly evident. The discordance with reports from different countries emphasize the crucial role of microbiological methods in setting possible therapeutic strategies. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3362851/ /pubmed/22675244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/913603 Text en Copyright © 2012 Antonietta Lambiase et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lambiase, Antonietta Agangi, Annalisa Del Pezzo, Mariassunta Quaglia, Filomena Testa, Antonio Rossano, Fabio Martinelli, Pasquale Catania, Maria Rosaria In Vitro Resistance to Macrolides and Clindamycin by Group B Streptococcus Isolated from Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women |
title |
In Vitro Resistance to Macrolides and Clindamycin by Group B Streptococcus Isolated from Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women |
title_full |
In Vitro Resistance to Macrolides and Clindamycin by Group B Streptococcus Isolated from Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women |
title_fullStr |
In Vitro Resistance to Macrolides and Clindamycin by Group B Streptococcus Isolated from Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women |
title_full_unstemmed |
In Vitro Resistance to Macrolides and Clindamycin by Group B Streptococcus Isolated from Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women |
title_short |
In Vitro Resistance to Macrolides and Clindamycin by Group B Streptococcus Isolated from Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women |
title_sort | in vitro resistance to macrolides and clindamycin by group b streptococcus isolated from pregnant and nonpregnant women |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3362851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22675244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/913603 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lambiaseantonietta invitroresistancetomacrolidesandclindamycinbygroupbstreptococcusisolatedfrompregnantandnonpregnantwomen AT agangiannalisa invitroresistancetomacrolidesandclindamycinbygroupbstreptococcusisolatedfrompregnantandnonpregnantwomen AT delpezzomariassunta invitroresistancetomacrolidesandclindamycinbygroupbstreptococcusisolatedfrompregnantandnonpregnantwomen AT quagliafilomena invitroresistancetomacrolidesandclindamycinbygroupbstreptococcusisolatedfrompregnantandnonpregnantwomen AT testaantonio invitroresistancetomacrolidesandclindamycinbygroupbstreptococcusisolatedfrompregnantandnonpregnantwomen AT rossanofabio invitroresistancetomacrolidesandclindamycinbygroupbstreptococcusisolatedfrompregnantandnonpregnantwomen AT martinellipasquale invitroresistancetomacrolidesandclindamycinbygroupbstreptococcusisolatedfrompregnantandnonpregnantwomen AT cataniamariarosaria invitroresistancetomacrolidesandclindamycinbygroupbstreptococcusisolatedfrompregnantandnonpregnantwomen |