Cargando…

In Vitro Resistance to Macrolides and Clindamycin by Group B Streptococcus Isolated from Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women

Background. Despite the introduction of screening bases intrapartum prophylaxis, Streptococcus agalactiae is still an important etiological agent of perinatal infections. The increasing rate of resistance and the differences in resistance pattern among countries suggest that a program of surveillanc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lambiase, Antonietta, Agangi, Annalisa, Del Pezzo, Mariassunta, Quaglia, Filomena, Testa, Antonio, Rossano, Fabio, Martinelli, Pasquale, Catania, Maria Rosaria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3362851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22675244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/913603
_version_ 1782234271916752896
author Lambiase, Antonietta
Agangi, Annalisa
Del Pezzo, Mariassunta
Quaglia, Filomena
Testa, Antonio
Rossano, Fabio
Martinelli, Pasquale
Catania, Maria Rosaria
author_facet Lambiase, Antonietta
Agangi, Annalisa
Del Pezzo, Mariassunta
Quaglia, Filomena
Testa, Antonio
Rossano, Fabio
Martinelli, Pasquale
Catania, Maria Rosaria
author_sort Lambiase, Antonietta
collection PubMed
description Background. Despite the introduction of screening bases intrapartum prophylaxis, Streptococcus agalactiae is still an important etiological agent of perinatal infections. The increasing rate of resistance and the differences in resistance pattern among countries suggest that a program of surveillance at the institutional level is important in determining optimal prophylaxis. In contrast, knowledge on GBS epidemiology in Italy is limited, and no data are available in the Southern region of the country. We sought to determine the occurrence of resistance to macrolides and clindamycin of GBS isolates in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Methods. Between 2005 and 2008, 1346 vaginal and 810 rectovaginal swabs were obtained from pregnant and not-pregnant women. Results. The occurrence of macrolides and clindamycin resistance was 16.5% in 2005 increasing up to 69.9% in 2008. A high percentage of isolates was resistant to tetracycline through all the study period with no statistically significant annual. Conclusions. In our cohort, an increase of in vitro resistance of GBS to macrolides and clindamycin is clearly evident. The discordance with reports from different countries emphasize the crucial role of microbiological methods in setting possible therapeutic strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3362851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33628512012-06-06 In Vitro Resistance to Macrolides and Clindamycin by Group B Streptococcus Isolated from Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women Lambiase, Antonietta Agangi, Annalisa Del Pezzo, Mariassunta Quaglia, Filomena Testa, Antonio Rossano, Fabio Martinelli, Pasquale Catania, Maria Rosaria Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol Research Article Background. Despite the introduction of screening bases intrapartum prophylaxis, Streptococcus agalactiae is still an important etiological agent of perinatal infections. The increasing rate of resistance and the differences in resistance pattern among countries suggest that a program of surveillance at the institutional level is important in determining optimal prophylaxis. In contrast, knowledge on GBS epidemiology in Italy is limited, and no data are available in the Southern region of the country. We sought to determine the occurrence of resistance to macrolides and clindamycin of GBS isolates in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Methods. Between 2005 and 2008, 1346 vaginal and 810 rectovaginal swabs were obtained from pregnant and not-pregnant women. Results. The occurrence of macrolides and clindamycin resistance was 16.5% in 2005 increasing up to 69.9% in 2008. A high percentage of isolates was resistant to tetracycline through all the study period with no statistically significant annual. Conclusions. In our cohort, an increase of in vitro resistance of GBS to macrolides and clindamycin is clearly evident. The discordance with reports from different countries emphasize the crucial role of microbiological methods in setting possible therapeutic strategies. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3362851/ /pubmed/22675244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/913603 Text en Copyright © 2012 Antonietta Lambiase et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lambiase, Antonietta
Agangi, Annalisa
Del Pezzo, Mariassunta
Quaglia, Filomena
Testa, Antonio
Rossano, Fabio
Martinelli, Pasquale
Catania, Maria Rosaria
In Vitro Resistance to Macrolides and Clindamycin by Group B Streptococcus Isolated from Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women
title In Vitro Resistance to Macrolides and Clindamycin by Group B Streptococcus Isolated from Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women
title_full In Vitro Resistance to Macrolides and Clindamycin by Group B Streptococcus Isolated from Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women
title_fullStr In Vitro Resistance to Macrolides and Clindamycin by Group B Streptococcus Isolated from Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro Resistance to Macrolides and Clindamycin by Group B Streptococcus Isolated from Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women
title_short In Vitro Resistance to Macrolides and Clindamycin by Group B Streptococcus Isolated from Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women
title_sort in vitro resistance to macrolides and clindamycin by group b streptococcus isolated from pregnant and nonpregnant women
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3362851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22675244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/913603
work_keys_str_mv AT lambiaseantonietta invitroresistancetomacrolidesandclindamycinbygroupbstreptococcusisolatedfrompregnantandnonpregnantwomen
AT agangiannalisa invitroresistancetomacrolidesandclindamycinbygroupbstreptococcusisolatedfrompregnantandnonpregnantwomen
AT delpezzomariassunta invitroresistancetomacrolidesandclindamycinbygroupbstreptococcusisolatedfrompregnantandnonpregnantwomen
AT quagliafilomena invitroresistancetomacrolidesandclindamycinbygroupbstreptococcusisolatedfrompregnantandnonpregnantwomen
AT testaantonio invitroresistancetomacrolidesandclindamycinbygroupbstreptococcusisolatedfrompregnantandnonpregnantwomen
AT rossanofabio invitroresistancetomacrolidesandclindamycinbygroupbstreptococcusisolatedfrompregnantandnonpregnantwomen
AT martinellipasquale invitroresistancetomacrolidesandclindamycinbygroupbstreptococcusisolatedfrompregnantandnonpregnantwomen
AT cataniamariarosaria invitroresistancetomacrolidesandclindamycinbygroupbstreptococcusisolatedfrompregnantandnonpregnantwomen