Cargando…

Performance and Cost of Disposable Biopsy Forceps in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Comparison with Reusable Biopsy Forceps

BACKGROUND/AIMS: It is believed that disposable biopsy forceps are more costly than reusable biopsy forceps. In this study, we evaluated performance and cost of disposable forceps versus reusable forceps in esophagogastroduodenoscopic biopsy. METHODS: Between October 2009 and July 2010, we enrolled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, Chul-Hyun, Choi, Myung-Gyu, Kim, Won Chul, Kim, Jin Soo, Cho, Yu Kyung, Park, Jae Myung, Lee, In Seok, Kim, Sang Woo, Choi, Kyu Yong, Chung, In-Sik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3363127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22741133
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2012.45.1.62
_version_ 1782234298696335360
author Lim, Chul-Hyun
Choi, Myung-Gyu
Kim, Won Chul
Kim, Jin Soo
Cho, Yu Kyung
Park, Jae Myung
Lee, In Seok
Kim, Sang Woo
Choi, Kyu Yong
Chung, In-Sik
author_facet Lim, Chul-Hyun
Choi, Myung-Gyu
Kim, Won Chul
Kim, Jin Soo
Cho, Yu Kyung
Park, Jae Myung
Lee, In Seok
Kim, Sang Woo
Choi, Kyu Yong
Chung, In-Sik
author_sort Lim, Chul-Hyun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: It is believed that disposable biopsy forceps are more costly than reusable biopsy forceps. In this study, we evaluated performance and cost of disposable forceps versus reusable forceps in esophagogastroduodenoscopic biopsy. METHODS: Between October 2009 and July 2010, we enrolled 200 patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopic biopsy at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital. Biopsies were performed with 100 disposable or 5 reusable forceps by random assignment. Seventy-five additional patients were studied to estimate durability of reusable forceps. The assisting nurses estimated the performance of the forceps. The evaluation of costs included purchase prices and reprocessing costs. The adequacy of the sample was estimated according to the diameter of the obtained tissue. RESULTS: Performance of disposable forceps was estimated as excellent in 97.0%, good in 2.0% and adequate in 1.0%. Reusable forceps were estimated as excellent in 36.0%, good in 36.0%, adequate in 25.1% and inadequate in 2.9%. The performance of reusable forceps declined with the number of uses. The reprocessing cost of reusable forceps for one biopsy session was calculated as ₩8,021. The adequacy of the sample was excellent for both forceps. CONCLUSIONS: Disposable forceps showed excellent performance. Considering the reprocessing costs of reusable forceps, usage of disposable forceps with a low price should be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3363127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33631272012-06-27 Performance and Cost of Disposable Biopsy Forceps in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Comparison with Reusable Biopsy Forceps Lim, Chul-Hyun Choi, Myung-Gyu Kim, Won Chul Kim, Jin Soo Cho, Yu Kyung Park, Jae Myung Lee, In Seok Kim, Sang Woo Choi, Kyu Yong Chung, In-Sik Clin Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: It is believed that disposable biopsy forceps are more costly than reusable biopsy forceps. In this study, we evaluated performance and cost of disposable forceps versus reusable forceps in esophagogastroduodenoscopic biopsy. METHODS: Between October 2009 and July 2010, we enrolled 200 patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopic biopsy at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital. Biopsies were performed with 100 disposable or 5 reusable forceps by random assignment. Seventy-five additional patients were studied to estimate durability of reusable forceps. The assisting nurses estimated the performance of the forceps. The evaluation of costs included purchase prices and reprocessing costs. The adequacy of the sample was estimated according to the diameter of the obtained tissue. RESULTS: Performance of disposable forceps was estimated as excellent in 97.0%, good in 2.0% and adequate in 1.0%. Reusable forceps were estimated as excellent in 36.0%, good in 36.0%, adequate in 25.1% and inadequate in 2.9%. The performance of reusable forceps declined with the number of uses. The reprocessing cost of reusable forceps for one biopsy session was calculated as ₩8,021. The adequacy of the sample was excellent for both forceps. CONCLUSIONS: Disposable forceps showed excellent performance. Considering the reprocessing costs of reusable forceps, usage of disposable forceps with a low price should be considered. The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2012-03 2012-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3363127/ /pubmed/22741133 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2012.45.1.62 Text en Copyright © 2012 The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lim, Chul-Hyun
Choi, Myung-Gyu
Kim, Won Chul
Kim, Jin Soo
Cho, Yu Kyung
Park, Jae Myung
Lee, In Seok
Kim, Sang Woo
Choi, Kyu Yong
Chung, In-Sik
Performance and Cost of Disposable Biopsy Forceps in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Comparison with Reusable Biopsy Forceps
title Performance and Cost of Disposable Biopsy Forceps in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Comparison with Reusable Biopsy Forceps
title_full Performance and Cost of Disposable Biopsy Forceps in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Comparison with Reusable Biopsy Forceps
title_fullStr Performance and Cost of Disposable Biopsy Forceps in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Comparison with Reusable Biopsy Forceps
title_full_unstemmed Performance and Cost of Disposable Biopsy Forceps in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Comparison with Reusable Biopsy Forceps
title_short Performance and Cost of Disposable Biopsy Forceps in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Comparison with Reusable Biopsy Forceps
title_sort performance and cost of disposable biopsy forceps in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: comparison with reusable biopsy forceps
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3363127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22741133
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2012.45.1.62
work_keys_str_mv AT limchulhyun performanceandcostofdisposablebiopsyforcepsinuppergastrointestinalendoscopycomparisonwithreusablebiopsyforceps
AT choimyunggyu performanceandcostofdisposablebiopsyforcepsinuppergastrointestinalendoscopycomparisonwithreusablebiopsyforceps
AT kimwonchul performanceandcostofdisposablebiopsyforcepsinuppergastrointestinalendoscopycomparisonwithreusablebiopsyforceps
AT kimjinsoo performanceandcostofdisposablebiopsyforcepsinuppergastrointestinalendoscopycomparisonwithreusablebiopsyforceps
AT choyukyung performanceandcostofdisposablebiopsyforcepsinuppergastrointestinalendoscopycomparisonwithreusablebiopsyforceps
AT parkjaemyung performanceandcostofdisposablebiopsyforcepsinuppergastrointestinalendoscopycomparisonwithreusablebiopsyforceps
AT leeinseok performanceandcostofdisposablebiopsyforcepsinuppergastrointestinalendoscopycomparisonwithreusablebiopsyforceps
AT kimsangwoo performanceandcostofdisposablebiopsyforcepsinuppergastrointestinalendoscopycomparisonwithreusablebiopsyforceps
AT choikyuyong performanceandcostofdisposablebiopsyforcepsinuppergastrointestinalendoscopycomparisonwithreusablebiopsyforceps
AT chunginsik performanceandcostofdisposablebiopsyforcepsinuppergastrointestinalendoscopycomparisonwithreusablebiopsyforceps