Cargando…

Comparison of multisensory and strength training for postural control in the elderly

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze the efficacy of multisensory versus muscle strengthening to improve postural control in healthy community-dwelling elderly. PARTICIPANTS: We performed a single-blinded study with 46 community-dwelling elderly allocated to strength (GS, n = 23; 70...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alfieri, Fábio Marcon, Riberto, Marcelo, Gatz, Lucila Silveira, Ribeiro, Carla Paschoal Corsi, Lopes, José Augusto Fernandes, Battistella, Linamara Rizzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3363301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22654512
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S27747
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze the efficacy of multisensory versus muscle strengthening to improve postural control in healthy community-dwelling elderly. PARTICIPANTS: We performed a single-blinded study with 46 community-dwelling elderly allocated to strength (GS, n = 23; 70.18 ± 4.8 years 22 women and 1 man) and multisensory exercises groups (GM, n = 23; 68.8 ± 5.9 years; 22 women and 1 man) for 12 weeks. METHODS: We performed isokinetic evaluations of muscle groups in the ankle and foot including dorsiflexors, plantar flexors, inversion, and eversion. The oscillation of the center of pressure was assessed with a force platform. RESULTS: The GM group presented a reduction in the oscillation (66.8 ± 273.4 cm(2) to 11.1 ± 11.6 cm(2); P = 0.02), which was not observed in the GS group. The GM group showed better results for the peak torque and work than the GS group, but without statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Although the GM group presented better results, it is not possible to state that one exercise regimen proved more efficacious than the other in improving balance control.