Cargando…
Tumour budding: a promising parameter in colorectal cancer
In 2011, the Tumour Node Metastasis (TNM) staging system still remains the gold standard for stratifying colorectal cancer (CRC) patients into prognostic subgroups, and is considered a solid basis for treatment management. Nevertheless, there is still a challenge with regard to therapeutic strategy;...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22531633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.127 |
_version_ | 1782234488147804160 |
---|---|
author | Lugli, A Karamitopoulou, E Zlobec, I |
author_facet | Lugli, A Karamitopoulou, E Zlobec, I |
author_sort | Lugli, A |
collection | PubMed |
description | In 2011, the Tumour Node Metastasis (TNM) staging system still remains the gold standard for stratifying colorectal cancer (CRC) patients into prognostic subgroups, and is considered a solid basis for treatment management. Nevertheless, there is still a challenge with regard to therapeutic strategy; stage II patients are not typically selected for postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, although some stage II patients have a comparable outcome to stage III patients who, themselves do receive such treatment. Consequently, there has been an inundation of ‘prognostic biomarker’ studies aiming to improve the prognostic stratification power of the TNM staging system. Most proposed biomarkers are not implemented because of lack of reproducibility, validation and standardisation. This problem can be partially resolved by following the REMARK guidelines. In search of novel prognostic factors for patients with CRC, one might glance at a table in the book entitled ‘Prognostic Factors in Cancer’ published by the International Union against Cancer (UICC) in 2006, in which TNM stage, L and V classifications are considered ‘essential’ prognostic factors, whereas tumour grade, perineural invasion, tumour budding and tumour-border configuration among others are proposed as ‘additional’ prognostic factors. Histopathology reports normally include the ‘essential’ features and are accompanied by tumour grade, histological subtype and information on perineural invasion, but interestingly, the tumour-border configuration (i.e., growth pattern) and especially tumour budding are rarely reported. Although scoring systems such as the ‘BRE’ in breast and ‘Gleason’ in prostate cancer are solidly based on histomorphological features and used in daily practice, no such additional scoring system to complement TNM staging is available for CRC. Regardless of differences in study design and methods for tumour-budding assessment, the prognostic power of tumour budding has been confirmed by dozens of study groups worldwide, suggesting that tumour budding may be a valuable candidate for inclusion into a future prognostic scoring system for CRC. This mini-review therefore attempts to present a short and concise overview on tumour budding, including morphological, molecular and prognostic aspects underlining its inter-disciplinary relevance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3364122 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33641222013-05-22 Tumour budding: a promising parameter in colorectal cancer Lugli, A Karamitopoulou, E Zlobec, I Br J Cancer Minireview In 2011, the Tumour Node Metastasis (TNM) staging system still remains the gold standard for stratifying colorectal cancer (CRC) patients into prognostic subgroups, and is considered a solid basis for treatment management. Nevertheless, there is still a challenge with regard to therapeutic strategy; stage II patients are not typically selected for postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, although some stage II patients have a comparable outcome to stage III patients who, themselves do receive such treatment. Consequently, there has been an inundation of ‘prognostic biomarker’ studies aiming to improve the prognostic stratification power of the TNM staging system. Most proposed biomarkers are not implemented because of lack of reproducibility, validation and standardisation. This problem can be partially resolved by following the REMARK guidelines. In search of novel prognostic factors for patients with CRC, one might glance at a table in the book entitled ‘Prognostic Factors in Cancer’ published by the International Union against Cancer (UICC) in 2006, in which TNM stage, L and V classifications are considered ‘essential’ prognostic factors, whereas tumour grade, perineural invasion, tumour budding and tumour-border configuration among others are proposed as ‘additional’ prognostic factors. Histopathology reports normally include the ‘essential’ features and are accompanied by tumour grade, histological subtype and information on perineural invasion, but interestingly, the tumour-border configuration (i.e., growth pattern) and especially tumour budding are rarely reported. Although scoring systems such as the ‘BRE’ in breast and ‘Gleason’ in prostate cancer are solidly based on histomorphological features and used in daily practice, no such additional scoring system to complement TNM staging is available for CRC. Regardless of differences in study design and methods for tumour-budding assessment, the prognostic power of tumour budding has been confirmed by dozens of study groups worldwide, suggesting that tumour budding may be a valuable candidate for inclusion into a future prognostic scoring system for CRC. This mini-review therefore attempts to present a short and concise overview on tumour budding, including morphological, molecular and prognostic aspects underlining its inter-disciplinary relevance. Nature Publishing Group 2012-05-22 2012-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3364122/ /pubmed/22531633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.127 Text en Copyright © 2012 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Minireview Lugli, A Karamitopoulou, E Zlobec, I Tumour budding: a promising parameter in colorectal cancer |
title | Tumour budding: a promising parameter in colorectal cancer |
title_full | Tumour budding: a promising parameter in colorectal cancer |
title_fullStr | Tumour budding: a promising parameter in colorectal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Tumour budding: a promising parameter in colorectal cancer |
title_short | Tumour budding: a promising parameter in colorectal cancer |
title_sort | tumour budding: a promising parameter in colorectal cancer |
topic | Minireview |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22531633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.127 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luglia tumourbuddingapromisingparameterincolorectalcancer AT karamitopouloue tumourbuddingapromisingparameterincolorectalcancer AT zlobeci tumourbuddingapromisingparameterincolorectalcancer |