Cargando…
Is it possible to estimate the minimal clinically important treatment effect needed to change practice in preterm birth prevention? Results of an obstetrician survey used to support the design of a trial
BACKGROUND: Sample sizes for obstetrical trials are often based on the opinion of investigators about clinically important effect size. We surveyed Canadian obstetricians to investigate clinically important effect sizes required before introducing new treatments into practice to prevent preterm birt...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22429514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-31 |
_version_ | 1782234490709475328 |
---|---|
author | Ross, Sue Milne, Jill Dwinnell, Shannon Tang, Selphee Wood, Stephen |
author_facet | Ross, Sue Milne, Jill Dwinnell, Shannon Tang, Selphee Wood, Stephen |
author_sort | Ross, Sue |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sample sizes for obstetrical trials are often based on the opinion of investigators about clinically important effect size. We surveyed Canadian obstetricians to investigate clinically important effect sizes required before introducing new treatments into practice to prevent preterm birth. METHODS: Questionnaires were mailed to practicing obstetricians, asking the magnitude of pregnancy prolongation required to introduce treatments into practice. The three prophylactic treatments were of increasing invasiveness: vaginal progesterone, intramuscular progesterone, and cervical cerclage. We also asked about the perceived most relevant outcome measures for obstetrical trials and current obstetrical practice in preterm birth prevention. RESULTS: 544/1293(42.1%) completed questionnaires were received. The majority of respondents required one or two weeks' increase in length of gestation before introducing vaginal (372,77.1%), and intramuscular progesterone(354,67.9%). At least three weeks increase was required before introducing prophylactic cervical cerclage(326,62.8%). Clinicians who already used a treatment required a smaller difference before introducing it into practice. Decreasing neonatal morbidity was cited as the most important outcome for obstetrical trials (349,72.2%). CONCLUSION: Obstetricians would require a larger increase in treatment effect before introducing more invasive treatments into practice. Although infant morbidity was perceived as a more important outcome, clinicians appeared willing to change practice on the basis of prolongation of pregnancy, a surrogate outcome. We found that there is not a single minimum clinically important treatment effect that will influence all practising clinicians: rather the effect size that will influence physicians is affected by the nature of the treatment, the reported outcome measure and the clinician's own current clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3364141 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33641412012-05-31 Is it possible to estimate the minimal clinically important treatment effect needed to change practice in preterm birth prevention? Results of an obstetrician survey used to support the design of a trial Ross, Sue Milne, Jill Dwinnell, Shannon Tang, Selphee Wood, Stephen BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Sample sizes for obstetrical trials are often based on the opinion of investigators about clinically important effect size. We surveyed Canadian obstetricians to investigate clinically important effect sizes required before introducing new treatments into practice to prevent preterm birth. METHODS: Questionnaires were mailed to practicing obstetricians, asking the magnitude of pregnancy prolongation required to introduce treatments into practice. The three prophylactic treatments were of increasing invasiveness: vaginal progesterone, intramuscular progesterone, and cervical cerclage. We also asked about the perceived most relevant outcome measures for obstetrical trials and current obstetrical practice in preterm birth prevention. RESULTS: 544/1293(42.1%) completed questionnaires were received. The majority of respondents required one or two weeks' increase in length of gestation before introducing vaginal (372,77.1%), and intramuscular progesterone(354,67.9%). At least three weeks increase was required before introducing prophylactic cervical cerclage(326,62.8%). Clinicians who already used a treatment required a smaller difference before introducing it into practice. Decreasing neonatal morbidity was cited as the most important outcome for obstetrical trials (349,72.2%). CONCLUSION: Obstetricians would require a larger increase in treatment effect before introducing more invasive treatments into practice. Although infant morbidity was perceived as a more important outcome, clinicians appeared willing to change practice on the basis of prolongation of pregnancy, a surrogate outcome. We found that there is not a single minimum clinically important treatment effect that will influence all practising clinicians: rather the effect size that will influence physicians is affected by the nature of the treatment, the reported outcome measure and the clinician's own current clinical practice. BioMed Central 2012-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3364141/ /pubmed/22429514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-31 Text en Copyright ©2012 Ross et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ross, Sue Milne, Jill Dwinnell, Shannon Tang, Selphee Wood, Stephen Is it possible to estimate the minimal clinically important treatment effect needed to change practice in preterm birth prevention? Results of an obstetrician survey used to support the design of a trial |
title | Is it possible to estimate the minimal clinically important treatment effect needed to change practice in preterm birth prevention? Results of an obstetrician survey used to support the design of a trial |
title_full | Is it possible to estimate the minimal clinically important treatment effect needed to change practice in preterm birth prevention? Results of an obstetrician survey used to support the design of a trial |
title_fullStr | Is it possible to estimate the minimal clinically important treatment effect needed to change practice in preterm birth prevention? Results of an obstetrician survey used to support the design of a trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Is it possible to estimate the minimal clinically important treatment effect needed to change practice in preterm birth prevention? Results of an obstetrician survey used to support the design of a trial |
title_short | Is it possible to estimate the minimal clinically important treatment effect needed to change practice in preterm birth prevention? Results of an obstetrician survey used to support the design of a trial |
title_sort | is it possible to estimate the minimal clinically important treatment effect needed to change practice in preterm birth prevention? results of an obstetrician survey used to support the design of a trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22429514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-31 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosssue isitpossibletoestimatetheminimalclinicallyimportanttreatmenteffectneededtochangepracticeinpretermbirthpreventionresultsofanobstetriciansurveyusedtosupportthedesignofatrial AT milnejill isitpossibletoestimatetheminimalclinicallyimportanttreatmenteffectneededtochangepracticeinpretermbirthpreventionresultsofanobstetriciansurveyusedtosupportthedesignofatrial AT dwinnellshannon isitpossibletoestimatetheminimalclinicallyimportanttreatmenteffectneededtochangepracticeinpretermbirthpreventionresultsofanobstetriciansurveyusedtosupportthedesignofatrial AT tangselphee isitpossibletoestimatetheminimalclinicallyimportanttreatmenteffectneededtochangepracticeinpretermbirthpreventionresultsofanobstetriciansurveyusedtosupportthedesignofatrial AT woodstephen isitpossibletoestimatetheminimalclinicallyimportanttreatmenteffectneededtochangepracticeinpretermbirthpreventionresultsofanobstetriciansurveyusedtosupportthedesignofatrial |