Cargando…
Chapter 2: Medical Tests Guidance (2) Developing the Topic and Structuring Systematic Reviews of Medical Tests: Utility of PICOTS, Analytic Frameworks, Decision Trees, and Other Frameworks
Topic development and structuring a systematic review of diagnostic tests are complementary processes. The goals of a medical test review are to identify and synthesize evidence to evaluate the impacts alternative testing strategies on health outcomes and to promote informed decisionmaking. A common...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22648670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2007-7 |
_version_ | 1782234526687166464 |
---|---|
author | Samson, David Schoelles, Karen M. |
author_facet | Samson, David Schoelles, Karen M. |
author_sort | Samson, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | Topic development and structuring a systematic review of diagnostic tests are complementary processes. The goals of a medical test review are to identify and synthesize evidence to evaluate the impacts alternative testing strategies on health outcomes and to promote informed decisionmaking. A common challenge is that the request for a review may state the claim for the test ambiguously. Due to the indirect impact of medical tests on clinical outcomes, reviewers need to identify which intermediate outcomes link a medical test to improved clinical outcomes. In this paper, we propose the use of five principles to deal with challenges: the PICOTS typology (patient population, intervention, comparator, outcomes, timing, setting), analytic frameworks, simple decision trees, other organizing frameworks and rules for when diagnostic accuracy is sufficient. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3364354 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33643542012-06-11 Chapter 2: Medical Tests Guidance (2) Developing the Topic and Structuring Systematic Reviews of Medical Tests: Utility of PICOTS, Analytic Frameworks, Decision Trees, and Other Frameworks Samson, David Schoelles, Karen M. J Gen Intern Med Original Research Topic development and structuring a systematic review of diagnostic tests are complementary processes. The goals of a medical test review are to identify and synthesize evidence to evaluate the impacts alternative testing strategies on health outcomes and to promote informed decisionmaking. A common challenge is that the request for a review may state the claim for the test ambiguously. Due to the indirect impact of medical tests on clinical outcomes, reviewers need to identify which intermediate outcomes link a medical test to improved clinical outcomes. In this paper, we propose the use of five principles to deal with challenges: the PICOTS typology (patient population, intervention, comparator, outcomes, timing, setting), analytic frameworks, simple decision trees, other organizing frameworks and rules for when diagnostic accuracy is sufficient. Springer-Verlag 2012-05-31 2012-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3364354/ /pubmed/22648670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2007-7 Text en © Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) 2012 |
spellingShingle | Original Research Samson, David Schoelles, Karen M. Chapter 2: Medical Tests Guidance (2) Developing the Topic and Structuring Systematic Reviews of Medical Tests: Utility of PICOTS, Analytic Frameworks, Decision Trees, and Other Frameworks |
title | Chapter 2: Medical Tests Guidance (2) Developing the Topic and Structuring Systematic Reviews of Medical Tests: Utility of PICOTS, Analytic Frameworks, Decision Trees, and Other Frameworks |
title_full | Chapter 2: Medical Tests Guidance (2) Developing the Topic and Structuring Systematic Reviews of Medical Tests: Utility of PICOTS, Analytic Frameworks, Decision Trees, and Other Frameworks |
title_fullStr | Chapter 2: Medical Tests Guidance (2) Developing the Topic and Structuring Systematic Reviews of Medical Tests: Utility of PICOTS, Analytic Frameworks, Decision Trees, and Other Frameworks |
title_full_unstemmed | Chapter 2: Medical Tests Guidance (2) Developing the Topic and Structuring Systematic Reviews of Medical Tests: Utility of PICOTS, Analytic Frameworks, Decision Trees, and Other Frameworks |
title_short | Chapter 2: Medical Tests Guidance (2) Developing the Topic and Structuring Systematic Reviews of Medical Tests: Utility of PICOTS, Analytic Frameworks, Decision Trees, and Other Frameworks |
title_sort | chapter 2: medical tests guidance (2) developing the topic and structuring systematic reviews of medical tests: utility of picots, analytic frameworks, decision trees, and other frameworks |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22648670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2007-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT samsondavid chapter2medicaltestsguidance2developingthetopicandstructuringsystematicreviewsofmedicaltestsutilityofpicotsanalyticframeworksdecisiontreesandotherframeworks AT schoelleskarenm chapter2medicaltestsguidance2developingthetopicandstructuringsystematicreviewsofmedicaltestsutilityofpicotsanalyticframeworksdecisiontreesandotherframeworks |