Cargando…
Hepatitis C virus infection among transmission-prone medical personnel
Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected physicians have been reported to infect some of their patients during exposure-prone procedures (EPPs). There is no European consensus on the policy for the prevention of this transmission. To help define an appropriate preventive policy, we determined the prevalence...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22045049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1466-9 |
_version_ | 1782234532205821952 |
---|---|
author | Zaaijer, H. L. Appelman, P. Frijstein, G. |
author_facet | Zaaijer, H. L. Appelman, P. Frijstein, G. |
author_sort | Zaaijer, H. L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected physicians have been reported to infect some of their patients during exposure-prone procedures (EPPs). There is no European consensus on the policy for the prevention of this transmission. To help define an appropriate preventive policy, we determined the prevalence of HCV infection among EPP-performing medical personnel in the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. The prevalence of HCV infection was studied among 729 EPP-performing health care workers. Serum samples, stored after post-hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination testing in the years 2000–2009, were tested for HCV antibodies. Repeat reactive samples were confirmed by immunoblot assay and the detection of HCV RNA. The average age of the 729 health care workers was 39 years (range 18–66), suggesting a considerable cumulative occupational exposure to the blood. Nevertheless, only one of the 729 workers (0.14%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: <0.01% to 0.85%) was tested and confirmed to be positive for anti-HCV and positive for HCV RNA, which is comparable to the prevalence of HCV among Amsterdam citizens. Against this background, for the protection of personnel and patients, careful follow-up after needlestick injuries may be sufficient. If a zero-risk approach is desirable and costs are less relevant, the recurrent screening of EPP-performing personnel for HCV is superior to the follow-up of reported occupational exposures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3364421 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33644212012-06-13 Hepatitis C virus infection among transmission-prone medical personnel Zaaijer, H. L. Appelman, P. Frijstein, G. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Article Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected physicians have been reported to infect some of their patients during exposure-prone procedures (EPPs). There is no European consensus on the policy for the prevention of this transmission. To help define an appropriate preventive policy, we determined the prevalence of HCV infection among EPP-performing medical personnel in the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. The prevalence of HCV infection was studied among 729 EPP-performing health care workers. Serum samples, stored after post-hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination testing in the years 2000–2009, were tested for HCV antibodies. Repeat reactive samples were confirmed by immunoblot assay and the detection of HCV RNA. The average age of the 729 health care workers was 39 years (range 18–66), suggesting a considerable cumulative occupational exposure to the blood. Nevertheless, only one of the 729 workers (0.14%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: <0.01% to 0.85%) was tested and confirmed to be positive for anti-HCV and positive for HCV RNA, which is comparable to the prevalence of HCV among Amsterdam citizens. Against this background, for the protection of personnel and patients, careful follow-up after needlestick injuries may be sufficient. If a zero-risk approach is desirable and costs are less relevant, the recurrent screening of EPP-performing personnel for HCV is superior to the follow-up of reported occupational exposures. Springer-Verlag 2011-11-03 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3364421/ /pubmed/22045049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1466-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Zaaijer, H. L. Appelman, P. Frijstein, G. Hepatitis C virus infection among transmission-prone medical personnel |
title | Hepatitis C virus infection among transmission-prone medical personnel |
title_full | Hepatitis C virus infection among transmission-prone medical personnel |
title_fullStr | Hepatitis C virus infection among transmission-prone medical personnel |
title_full_unstemmed | Hepatitis C virus infection among transmission-prone medical personnel |
title_short | Hepatitis C virus infection among transmission-prone medical personnel |
title_sort | hepatitis c virus infection among transmission-prone medical personnel |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22045049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1466-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zaaijerhl hepatitiscvirusinfectionamongtransmissionpronemedicalpersonnel AT appelmanp hepatitiscvirusinfectionamongtransmissionpronemedicalpersonnel AT frijsteing hepatitiscvirusinfectionamongtransmissionpronemedicalpersonnel |