Cargando…

Hepatitis C virus infection among transmission-prone medical personnel

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected physicians have been reported to infect some of their patients during exposure-prone procedures (EPPs). There is no European consensus on the policy for the prevention of this transmission. To help define an appropriate preventive policy, we determined the prevalence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zaaijer, H. L., Appelman, P., Frijstein, G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22045049
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1466-9
_version_ 1782234532205821952
author Zaaijer, H. L.
Appelman, P.
Frijstein, G.
author_facet Zaaijer, H. L.
Appelman, P.
Frijstein, G.
author_sort Zaaijer, H. L.
collection PubMed
description Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected physicians have been reported to infect some of their patients during exposure-prone procedures (EPPs). There is no European consensus on the policy for the prevention of this transmission. To help define an appropriate preventive policy, we determined the prevalence of HCV infection among EPP-performing medical personnel in the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. The prevalence of HCV infection was studied among 729 EPP-performing health care workers. Serum samples, stored after post-hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination testing in the years 2000–2009, were tested for HCV antibodies. Repeat reactive samples were confirmed by immunoblot assay and the detection of HCV RNA. The average age of the 729 health care workers was 39 years (range 18–66), suggesting a considerable cumulative occupational exposure to the blood. Nevertheless, only one of the 729 workers (0.14%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: <0.01% to 0.85%) was tested and confirmed to be positive for anti-HCV and positive for HCV RNA, which is comparable to the prevalence of HCV among Amsterdam citizens. Against this background, for the protection of personnel and patients, careful follow-up after needlestick injuries may be sufficient. If a zero-risk approach is desirable and costs are less relevant, the recurrent screening of EPP-performing personnel for HCV is superior to the follow-up of reported occupational exposures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3364421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33644212012-06-13 Hepatitis C virus infection among transmission-prone medical personnel Zaaijer, H. L. Appelman, P. Frijstein, G. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Article Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected physicians have been reported to infect some of their patients during exposure-prone procedures (EPPs). There is no European consensus on the policy for the prevention of this transmission. To help define an appropriate preventive policy, we determined the prevalence of HCV infection among EPP-performing medical personnel in the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. The prevalence of HCV infection was studied among 729 EPP-performing health care workers. Serum samples, stored after post-hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination testing in the years 2000–2009, were tested for HCV antibodies. Repeat reactive samples were confirmed by immunoblot assay and the detection of HCV RNA. The average age of the 729 health care workers was 39 years (range 18–66), suggesting a considerable cumulative occupational exposure to the blood. Nevertheless, only one of the 729 workers (0.14%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: <0.01% to 0.85%) was tested and confirmed to be positive for anti-HCV and positive for HCV RNA, which is comparable to the prevalence of HCV among Amsterdam citizens. Against this background, for the protection of personnel and patients, careful follow-up after needlestick injuries may be sufficient. If a zero-risk approach is desirable and costs are less relevant, the recurrent screening of EPP-performing personnel for HCV is superior to the follow-up of reported occupational exposures. Springer-Verlag 2011-11-03 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3364421/ /pubmed/22045049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1466-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Zaaijer, H. L.
Appelman, P.
Frijstein, G.
Hepatitis C virus infection among transmission-prone medical personnel
title Hepatitis C virus infection among transmission-prone medical personnel
title_full Hepatitis C virus infection among transmission-prone medical personnel
title_fullStr Hepatitis C virus infection among transmission-prone medical personnel
title_full_unstemmed Hepatitis C virus infection among transmission-prone medical personnel
title_short Hepatitis C virus infection among transmission-prone medical personnel
title_sort hepatitis c virus infection among transmission-prone medical personnel
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22045049
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1466-9
work_keys_str_mv AT zaaijerhl hepatitiscvirusinfectionamongtransmissionpronemedicalpersonnel
AT appelmanp hepatitiscvirusinfectionamongtransmissionpronemedicalpersonnel
AT frijsteing hepatitiscvirusinfectionamongtransmissionpronemedicalpersonnel