Cargando…

Development of robust discriminant equations for assessing subtypes of glioblastoma biopsies

BACKGROUND: In the preceding decade, various studies on glioblastoma (Gb) demonstrated that signatures obtained from gene expression microarrays correlate better with survival than with histopathological classification. However, there is not a universal consensus formula to predict patient survival....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Castells, X, Acebes, J J, Majós, C, Boluda, S, Julià-Sapé, M, Candiota, A P, Ariño, J, Barceló, A, Arús, C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22568967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.174
_version_ 1782234554967261184
author Castells, X
Acebes, J J
Majós, C
Boluda, S
Julià-Sapé, M
Candiota, A P
Ariño, J
Barceló, A
Arús, C
author_facet Castells, X
Acebes, J J
Majós, C
Boluda, S
Julià-Sapé, M
Candiota, A P
Ariño, J
Barceló, A
Arús, C
author_sort Castells, X
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the preceding decade, various studies on glioblastoma (Gb) demonstrated that signatures obtained from gene expression microarrays correlate better with survival than with histopathological classification. However, there is not a universal consensus formula to predict patient survival. METHODS: We developed a gene signature using the expression profile of 47 Gbs through an unsupervised procedure and two groups were obtained. Subsequent to a training procedure through leave-one-out cross-validation, we fitted a discriminant (linear discriminant analysis (LDA)) equation using the four most discriminant probesets. This was repeated for two other published signatures and the performance of LDA equations was evaluated on an independent test set, which contained status of IDH1 mutation, EGFR amplification, MGMT methylation and gene VEGF expression, among other clinical and molecular information. RESULTS: The unsupervised local signature was composed of 69 probesets and clearly defined two Gb groups, which would agree with primary and secondary Gbs. This hypothesis was confirmed by predicting cases from the independent data set using the equations developed by us. The high survival group predicted by equations based on our local and one of the published signatures contained a significantly higher percentage of cases displaying IDH1 mutation and non-amplification of EGFR. In contrast, only the equation based on the published signature showed in the poor survival group a significant high percentage of cases displaying a hypothesised methylation of MGMT gene promoter and overexpression of gene VEGF. CONCLUSION: We have produced a robust equation to confidently discriminate Gb subtypes based in the normalised expression level of only four genes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3364559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33645592013-05-22 Development of robust discriminant equations for assessing subtypes of glioblastoma biopsies Castells, X Acebes, J J Majós, C Boluda, S Julià-Sapé, M Candiota, A P Ariño, J Barceló, A Arús, C Br J Cancer Molecular Diagnostics BACKGROUND: In the preceding decade, various studies on glioblastoma (Gb) demonstrated that signatures obtained from gene expression microarrays correlate better with survival than with histopathological classification. However, there is not a universal consensus formula to predict patient survival. METHODS: We developed a gene signature using the expression profile of 47 Gbs through an unsupervised procedure and two groups were obtained. Subsequent to a training procedure through leave-one-out cross-validation, we fitted a discriminant (linear discriminant analysis (LDA)) equation using the four most discriminant probesets. This was repeated for two other published signatures and the performance of LDA equations was evaluated on an independent test set, which contained status of IDH1 mutation, EGFR amplification, MGMT methylation and gene VEGF expression, among other clinical and molecular information. RESULTS: The unsupervised local signature was composed of 69 probesets and clearly defined two Gb groups, which would agree with primary and secondary Gbs. This hypothesis was confirmed by predicting cases from the independent data set using the equations developed by us. The high survival group predicted by equations based on our local and one of the published signatures contained a significantly higher percentage of cases displaying IDH1 mutation and non-amplification of EGFR. In contrast, only the equation based on the published signature showed in the poor survival group a significant high percentage of cases displaying a hypothesised methylation of MGMT gene promoter and overexpression of gene VEGF. CONCLUSION: We have produced a robust equation to confidently discriminate Gb subtypes based in the normalised expression level of only four genes. Nature Publishing Group 2012-05-22 2012-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3364559/ /pubmed/22568967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.174 Text en Copyright © 2012 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Molecular Diagnostics
Castells, X
Acebes, J J
Majós, C
Boluda, S
Julià-Sapé, M
Candiota, A P
Ariño, J
Barceló, A
Arús, C
Development of robust discriminant equations for assessing subtypes of glioblastoma biopsies
title Development of robust discriminant equations for assessing subtypes of glioblastoma biopsies
title_full Development of robust discriminant equations for assessing subtypes of glioblastoma biopsies
title_fullStr Development of robust discriminant equations for assessing subtypes of glioblastoma biopsies
title_full_unstemmed Development of robust discriminant equations for assessing subtypes of glioblastoma biopsies
title_short Development of robust discriminant equations for assessing subtypes of glioblastoma biopsies
title_sort development of robust discriminant equations for assessing subtypes of glioblastoma biopsies
topic Molecular Diagnostics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22568967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.174
work_keys_str_mv AT castellsx developmentofrobustdiscriminantequationsforassessingsubtypesofglioblastomabiopsies
AT acebesjj developmentofrobustdiscriminantequationsforassessingsubtypesofglioblastomabiopsies
AT majosc developmentofrobustdiscriminantequationsforassessingsubtypesofglioblastomabiopsies
AT boludas developmentofrobustdiscriminantequationsforassessingsubtypesofglioblastomabiopsies
AT juliasapem developmentofrobustdiscriminantequationsforassessingsubtypesofglioblastomabiopsies
AT candiotaap developmentofrobustdiscriminantequationsforassessingsubtypesofglioblastomabiopsies
AT arinoj developmentofrobustdiscriminantequationsforassessingsubtypesofglioblastomabiopsies
AT barceloa developmentofrobustdiscriminantequationsforassessingsubtypesofglioblastomabiopsies
AT arusc developmentofrobustdiscriminantequationsforassessingsubtypesofglioblastomabiopsies