Cargando…

How Past and Present Influence the Foraging of Clonal Plants?

Clonal plants spreading horizontally and forming a network structure of ramets exhibit complex growth patterns to maximize resource uptake from the environment. They respond to spatial heterogeneity by changing their internode length or branching frequency. Ramets definitively root in the soil but s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Louâpre, Philipe, Bittebière, Anne-Kristel, Clément, Bernard, Pierre, Jean-Sébastien, Mony, Cendrine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3365891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22675539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038288
_version_ 1782234699821744128
author Louâpre, Philipe
Bittebière, Anne-Kristel
Clément, Bernard
Pierre, Jean-Sébastien
Mony, Cendrine
author_facet Louâpre, Philipe
Bittebière, Anne-Kristel
Clément, Bernard
Pierre, Jean-Sébastien
Mony, Cendrine
author_sort Louâpre, Philipe
collection PubMed
description Clonal plants spreading horizontally and forming a network structure of ramets exhibit complex growth patterns to maximize resource uptake from the environment. They respond to spatial heterogeneity by changing their internode length or branching frequency. Ramets definitively root in the soil but stay interconnected for a varying period of time thus allowing an exchange of spatial and temporal information. We quantified the foraging response of clonal plants depending on the local soil quality sampled by the rooting ramet (i.e. the present information) and the resource variability sampled by the older ramets (i.e. the past information). We demonstrated that two related species, Potentilla reptans and P. anserina, responded similarly to the local quality of their environment by decreasing their internode length in response to nutrient-rich soil. Only P. reptans responded to resource variability by decreasing its internode length. In both species, the experience acquired by older ramets influenced the plastic response of new rooted ramets: the internode length between ramets depended not only on the soil quality locally sampled but also on the soil quality previously sampled by older ramets. We quantified the effect of the information perceived at different time and space on the foraging behavior of clonal plants by showing a non-linear response of the ramet rooting in the soil of a given quality. These data suggest that the decision to grow a stolon or to root a ramet at a given distance from the older ramet results from the integration of the past and present information about the richness and the variability of the environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3365891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33658912012-06-06 How Past and Present Influence the Foraging of Clonal Plants? Louâpre, Philipe Bittebière, Anne-Kristel Clément, Bernard Pierre, Jean-Sébastien Mony, Cendrine PLoS One Research Article Clonal plants spreading horizontally and forming a network structure of ramets exhibit complex growth patterns to maximize resource uptake from the environment. They respond to spatial heterogeneity by changing their internode length or branching frequency. Ramets definitively root in the soil but stay interconnected for a varying period of time thus allowing an exchange of spatial and temporal information. We quantified the foraging response of clonal plants depending on the local soil quality sampled by the rooting ramet (i.e. the present information) and the resource variability sampled by the older ramets (i.e. the past information). We demonstrated that two related species, Potentilla reptans and P. anserina, responded similarly to the local quality of their environment by decreasing their internode length in response to nutrient-rich soil. Only P. reptans responded to resource variability by decreasing its internode length. In both species, the experience acquired by older ramets influenced the plastic response of new rooted ramets: the internode length between ramets depended not only on the soil quality locally sampled but also on the soil quality previously sampled by older ramets. We quantified the effect of the information perceived at different time and space on the foraging behavior of clonal plants by showing a non-linear response of the ramet rooting in the soil of a given quality. These data suggest that the decision to grow a stolon or to root a ramet at a given distance from the older ramet results from the integration of the past and present information about the richness and the variability of the environment. Public Library of Science 2012-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3365891/ /pubmed/22675539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038288 Text en Louâpre et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Louâpre, Philipe
Bittebière, Anne-Kristel
Clément, Bernard
Pierre, Jean-Sébastien
Mony, Cendrine
How Past and Present Influence the Foraging of Clonal Plants?
title How Past and Present Influence the Foraging of Clonal Plants?
title_full How Past and Present Influence the Foraging of Clonal Plants?
title_fullStr How Past and Present Influence the Foraging of Clonal Plants?
title_full_unstemmed How Past and Present Influence the Foraging of Clonal Plants?
title_short How Past and Present Influence the Foraging of Clonal Plants?
title_sort how past and present influence the foraging of clonal plants?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3365891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22675539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038288
work_keys_str_mv AT louaprephilipe howpastandpresentinfluencetheforagingofclonalplants
AT bittebiereannekristel howpastandpresentinfluencetheforagingofclonalplants
AT clementbernard howpastandpresentinfluencetheforagingofclonalplants
AT pierrejeansebastien howpastandpresentinfluencetheforagingofclonalplants
AT monycendrine howpastandpresentinfluencetheforagingofclonalplants