Cargando…

Pregnancy-Related Lumbopelvic Pain: Listening to Australian Women

Objective. To investigate the prevalence and nature of lumbo-pelvic pain (LPP), that is experienced by women in the lumbar and/or sacro-iliac area and/or symphysis pubis during pregnancy. Design. Cross-sectional, descriptive study. Setting. An Australian public hospital antenatal clinic. Sample popu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pierce, Heather, Homer, Caroline S. E., Dahlen, Hannah G., King, Jenny
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3366229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22685643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/387428
_version_ 1782234723566747648
author Pierce, Heather
Homer, Caroline S. E.
Dahlen, Hannah G.
King, Jenny
author_facet Pierce, Heather
Homer, Caroline S. E.
Dahlen, Hannah G.
King, Jenny
author_sort Pierce, Heather
collection PubMed
description Objective. To investigate the prevalence and nature of lumbo-pelvic pain (LPP), that is experienced by women in the lumbar and/or sacro-iliac area and/or symphysis pubis during pregnancy. Design. Cross-sectional, descriptive study. Setting. An Australian public hospital antenatal clinic. Sample population: Women in their third trimester of pregnancy. Method. Women were recruited to the study as they presented for their antenatal appointment. A survey collected demographic data and was used to self report LPP. A pain diagram differentiated low back, pelvic girdle or combined pain. Closed and open ended questions explored the experiences of the women. Main Outcome Measures. The Visual Analogue Scale and the Oswestry Disability Index (Version 2.1a). Results. There was a high prevalence of self reported LPP during the pregnancy (71%). An association was found between the reporting of LPP, multiparity, and a previous history of LPP. The mean intensity score for usual pain was 6/10 and four out of five women reported disability associated with the condition. Most women (71%) had reported their symptoms to their maternity carer however only a small proportion of these women received intervention. Conclusion. LPP is a potentially significant health issue during pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3366229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33662292012-06-08 Pregnancy-Related Lumbopelvic Pain: Listening to Australian Women Pierce, Heather Homer, Caroline S. E. Dahlen, Hannah G. King, Jenny Nurs Res Pract Research Article Objective. To investigate the prevalence and nature of lumbo-pelvic pain (LPP), that is experienced by women in the lumbar and/or sacro-iliac area and/or symphysis pubis during pregnancy. Design. Cross-sectional, descriptive study. Setting. An Australian public hospital antenatal clinic. Sample population: Women in their third trimester of pregnancy. Method. Women were recruited to the study as they presented for their antenatal appointment. A survey collected demographic data and was used to self report LPP. A pain diagram differentiated low back, pelvic girdle or combined pain. Closed and open ended questions explored the experiences of the women. Main Outcome Measures. The Visual Analogue Scale and the Oswestry Disability Index (Version 2.1a). Results. There was a high prevalence of self reported LPP during the pregnancy (71%). An association was found between the reporting of LPP, multiparity, and a previous history of LPP. The mean intensity score for usual pain was 6/10 and four out of five women reported disability associated with the condition. Most women (71%) had reported their symptoms to their maternity carer however only a small proportion of these women received intervention. Conclusion. LPP is a potentially significant health issue during pregnancy. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3366229/ /pubmed/22685643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/387428 Text en Copyright © 2012 Heather Pierce et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pierce, Heather
Homer, Caroline S. E.
Dahlen, Hannah G.
King, Jenny
Pregnancy-Related Lumbopelvic Pain: Listening to Australian Women
title Pregnancy-Related Lumbopelvic Pain: Listening to Australian Women
title_full Pregnancy-Related Lumbopelvic Pain: Listening to Australian Women
title_fullStr Pregnancy-Related Lumbopelvic Pain: Listening to Australian Women
title_full_unstemmed Pregnancy-Related Lumbopelvic Pain: Listening to Australian Women
title_short Pregnancy-Related Lumbopelvic Pain: Listening to Australian Women
title_sort pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain: listening to australian women
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3366229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22685643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/387428
work_keys_str_mv AT pierceheather pregnancyrelatedlumbopelvicpainlisteningtoaustralianwomen
AT homercarolinese pregnancyrelatedlumbopelvicpainlisteningtoaustralianwomen
AT dahlenhannahg pregnancyrelatedlumbopelvicpainlisteningtoaustralianwomen
AT kingjenny pregnancyrelatedlumbopelvicpainlisteningtoaustralianwomen