Cargando…

A Short Version of the Revised ‘Experience of Close Relationships Questionnaire’: Investigating Non-Clinical and Clinical Samples

AIM: This study seeks to investigate the psychometric properties of the short version of the revised ‘Experience of Close Relationships’ questionnaire, comparing non-clinical and clinical samples. METHODS: In total 702 subjects participated in this study, of whom 531 were non-clinical participants a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wongpakaran, Tinakon, Wongpakaran, Nahathai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3367387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22675397
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1745017901208010036
_version_ 1782234844750675968
author Wongpakaran, Tinakon
Wongpakaran, Nahathai
author_facet Wongpakaran, Tinakon
Wongpakaran, Nahathai
author_sort Wongpakaran, Tinakon
collection PubMed
description AIM: This study seeks to investigate the psychometric properties of the short version of the revised ‘Experience of Close Relationships’ questionnaire, comparing non-clinical and clinical samples. METHODS: In total 702 subjects participated in this study, of whom 531 were non-clinical participants and 171 were psychiatric patients. They completed the short version of the revised ‘Experience of Close Relationships’ questionnaire (ECR-R-18), the Perceived Stress Scale-10(PSS-10), the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) and the UCLA Loneliness scale. A retest of the ECR-R-18 was then performed at four-week intervals. Then, confirmatory factor analyses were performed to test the validity of the new scale. RESULTS: The ECR-R-18 showed a fair to good internal consistency (α 0.77 to 0.87) for both samples, and the test-retest reliability was found to be satisfactory (ICC = 0.75). The anxiety sub-scale demonstrated concurrent validity with PSS-10 and RSES, while the avoidance sub-scale showed concurrent validity with the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Confirmatory factor analysis using method factors yielded two factors with an acceptable model fit for both groups. An invariance test revealed that the ECR-R-18 when used on the clinical group differed from when used with the non-clinical group. CONCLUSIONS: The ECR-R-18 questionnaire revealed an overall better level of fit than the original 36 item questionnaire, indicating its suitability for use with a broader group of samples, including clinical samples. The reliability of the ECR-R- 18 might be increased if a modified scoring system is used and if our suggestions with regard to future studies are followed up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3367387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33673872012-06-06 A Short Version of the Revised ‘Experience of Close Relationships Questionnaire’: Investigating Non-Clinical and Clinical Samples Wongpakaran, Tinakon Wongpakaran, Nahathai Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health Article AIM: This study seeks to investigate the psychometric properties of the short version of the revised ‘Experience of Close Relationships’ questionnaire, comparing non-clinical and clinical samples. METHODS: In total 702 subjects participated in this study, of whom 531 were non-clinical participants and 171 were psychiatric patients. They completed the short version of the revised ‘Experience of Close Relationships’ questionnaire (ECR-R-18), the Perceived Stress Scale-10(PSS-10), the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) and the UCLA Loneliness scale. A retest of the ECR-R-18 was then performed at four-week intervals. Then, confirmatory factor analyses were performed to test the validity of the new scale. RESULTS: The ECR-R-18 showed a fair to good internal consistency (α 0.77 to 0.87) for both samples, and the test-retest reliability was found to be satisfactory (ICC = 0.75). The anxiety sub-scale demonstrated concurrent validity with PSS-10 and RSES, while the avoidance sub-scale showed concurrent validity with the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Confirmatory factor analysis using method factors yielded two factors with an acceptable model fit for both groups. An invariance test revealed that the ECR-R-18 when used on the clinical group differed from when used with the non-clinical group. CONCLUSIONS: The ECR-R-18 questionnaire revealed an overall better level of fit than the original 36 item questionnaire, indicating its suitability for use with a broader group of samples, including clinical samples. The reliability of the ECR-R- 18 might be increased if a modified scoring system is used and if our suggestions with regard to future studies are followed up. Bentham Open 2012-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3367387/ /pubmed/22675397 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1745017901208010036 Text en © Wongpakaran and Wongpakaran; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Wongpakaran, Tinakon
Wongpakaran, Nahathai
A Short Version of the Revised ‘Experience of Close Relationships Questionnaire’: Investigating Non-Clinical and Clinical Samples
title A Short Version of the Revised ‘Experience of Close Relationships Questionnaire’: Investigating Non-Clinical and Clinical Samples
title_full A Short Version of the Revised ‘Experience of Close Relationships Questionnaire’: Investigating Non-Clinical and Clinical Samples
title_fullStr A Short Version of the Revised ‘Experience of Close Relationships Questionnaire’: Investigating Non-Clinical and Clinical Samples
title_full_unstemmed A Short Version of the Revised ‘Experience of Close Relationships Questionnaire’: Investigating Non-Clinical and Clinical Samples
title_short A Short Version of the Revised ‘Experience of Close Relationships Questionnaire’: Investigating Non-Clinical and Clinical Samples
title_sort short version of the revised ‘experience of close relationships questionnaire’: investigating non-clinical and clinical samples
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3367387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22675397
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1745017901208010036
work_keys_str_mv AT wongpakarantinakon ashortversionoftherevisedexperienceofcloserelationshipsquestionnaireinvestigatingnonclinicalandclinicalsamples
AT wongpakarannahathai ashortversionoftherevisedexperienceofcloserelationshipsquestionnaireinvestigatingnonclinicalandclinicalsamples
AT wongpakarantinakon shortversionoftherevisedexperienceofcloserelationshipsquestionnaireinvestigatingnonclinicalandclinicalsamples
AT wongpakarannahathai shortversionoftherevisedexperienceofcloserelationshipsquestionnaireinvestigatingnonclinicalandclinicalsamples