Cargando…
A Short Version of the Revised ‘Experience of Close Relationships Questionnaire’: Investigating Non-Clinical and Clinical Samples
AIM: This study seeks to investigate the psychometric properties of the short version of the revised ‘Experience of Close Relationships’ questionnaire, comparing non-clinical and clinical samples. METHODS: In total 702 subjects participated in this study, of whom 531 were non-clinical participants a...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bentham Open
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3367387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22675397 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1745017901208010036 |
_version_ | 1782234844750675968 |
---|---|
author | Wongpakaran, Tinakon Wongpakaran, Nahathai |
author_facet | Wongpakaran, Tinakon Wongpakaran, Nahathai |
author_sort | Wongpakaran, Tinakon |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: This study seeks to investigate the psychometric properties of the short version of the revised ‘Experience of Close Relationships’ questionnaire, comparing non-clinical and clinical samples. METHODS: In total 702 subjects participated in this study, of whom 531 were non-clinical participants and 171 were psychiatric patients. They completed the short version of the revised ‘Experience of Close Relationships’ questionnaire (ECR-R-18), the Perceived Stress Scale-10(PSS-10), the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) and the UCLA Loneliness scale. A retest of the ECR-R-18 was then performed at four-week intervals. Then, confirmatory factor analyses were performed to test the validity of the new scale. RESULTS: The ECR-R-18 showed a fair to good internal consistency (α 0.77 to 0.87) for both samples, and the test-retest reliability was found to be satisfactory (ICC = 0.75). The anxiety sub-scale demonstrated concurrent validity with PSS-10 and RSES, while the avoidance sub-scale showed concurrent validity with the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Confirmatory factor analysis using method factors yielded two factors with an acceptable model fit for both groups. An invariance test revealed that the ECR-R-18 when used on the clinical group differed from when used with the non-clinical group. CONCLUSIONS: The ECR-R-18 questionnaire revealed an overall better level of fit than the original 36 item questionnaire, indicating its suitability for use with a broader group of samples, including clinical samples. The reliability of the ECR-R- 18 might be increased if a modified scoring system is used and if our suggestions with regard to future studies are followed up. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3367387 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Bentham Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33673872012-06-06 A Short Version of the Revised ‘Experience of Close Relationships Questionnaire’: Investigating Non-Clinical and Clinical Samples Wongpakaran, Tinakon Wongpakaran, Nahathai Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health Article AIM: This study seeks to investigate the psychometric properties of the short version of the revised ‘Experience of Close Relationships’ questionnaire, comparing non-clinical and clinical samples. METHODS: In total 702 subjects participated in this study, of whom 531 were non-clinical participants and 171 were psychiatric patients. They completed the short version of the revised ‘Experience of Close Relationships’ questionnaire (ECR-R-18), the Perceived Stress Scale-10(PSS-10), the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) and the UCLA Loneliness scale. A retest of the ECR-R-18 was then performed at four-week intervals. Then, confirmatory factor analyses were performed to test the validity of the new scale. RESULTS: The ECR-R-18 showed a fair to good internal consistency (α 0.77 to 0.87) for both samples, and the test-retest reliability was found to be satisfactory (ICC = 0.75). The anxiety sub-scale demonstrated concurrent validity with PSS-10 and RSES, while the avoidance sub-scale showed concurrent validity with the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Confirmatory factor analysis using method factors yielded two factors with an acceptable model fit for both groups. An invariance test revealed that the ECR-R-18 when used on the clinical group differed from when used with the non-clinical group. CONCLUSIONS: The ECR-R-18 questionnaire revealed an overall better level of fit than the original 36 item questionnaire, indicating its suitability for use with a broader group of samples, including clinical samples. The reliability of the ECR-R- 18 might be increased if a modified scoring system is used and if our suggestions with regard to future studies are followed up. Bentham Open 2012-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3367387/ /pubmed/22675397 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1745017901208010036 Text en © Wongpakaran and Wongpakaran; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Wongpakaran, Tinakon Wongpakaran, Nahathai A Short Version of the Revised ‘Experience of Close Relationships Questionnaire’: Investigating Non-Clinical and Clinical Samples |
title | A Short Version of the Revised ‘Experience of Close Relationships Questionnaire’: Investigating Non-Clinical and Clinical Samples |
title_full | A Short Version of the Revised ‘Experience of Close Relationships Questionnaire’: Investigating Non-Clinical and Clinical Samples |
title_fullStr | A Short Version of the Revised ‘Experience of Close Relationships Questionnaire’: Investigating Non-Clinical and Clinical Samples |
title_full_unstemmed | A Short Version of the Revised ‘Experience of Close Relationships Questionnaire’: Investigating Non-Clinical and Clinical Samples |
title_short | A Short Version of the Revised ‘Experience of Close Relationships Questionnaire’: Investigating Non-Clinical and Clinical Samples |
title_sort | short version of the revised ‘experience of close relationships questionnaire’: investigating non-clinical and clinical samples |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3367387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22675397 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1745017901208010036 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wongpakarantinakon ashortversionoftherevisedexperienceofcloserelationshipsquestionnaireinvestigatingnonclinicalandclinicalsamples AT wongpakarannahathai ashortversionoftherevisedexperienceofcloserelationshipsquestionnaireinvestigatingnonclinicalandclinicalsamples AT wongpakarantinakon shortversionoftherevisedexperienceofcloserelationshipsquestionnaireinvestigatingnonclinicalandclinicalsamples AT wongpakarannahathai shortversionoftherevisedexperienceofcloserelationshipsquestionnaireinvestigatingnonclinicalandclinicalsamples |