Cargando…
Artificial grammar learning meets formal language theory: an overview
Formal language theory (FLT), part of the broader mathematical theory of computation, provides a systematic terminology and set of conventions for describing rules and the structures they generate, along with a rich body of discoveries and theorems concerning generative rule systems. Despite its nam...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3367694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22688631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0103 |
_version_ | 1782234877075128320 |
---|---|
author | Fitch, W. Tecumseh Friederici, Angela D. |
author_facet | Fitch, W. Tecumseh Friederici, Angela D. |
author_sort | Fitch, W. Tecumseh |
collection | PubMed |
description | Formal language theory (FLT), part of the broader mathematical theory of computation, provides a systematic terminology and set of conventions for describing rules and the structures they generate, along with a rich body of discoveries and theorems concerning generative rule systems. Despite its name, FLT is not limited to human language, but is equally applicable to computer programs, music, visual patterns, animal vocalizations, RNA structure and even dance. In the last decade, this theory has been profitably used to frame hypotheses and to design brain imaging and animal-learning experiments, mostly using the ‘artificial grammar-learning’ paradigm. We offer a brief, non-technical introduction to FLT and then a more detailed analysis of empirical research based on this theory. We suggest that progress has been hampered by a pervasive conflation of distinct issues, including hierarchy, dependency, complexity and recursion. We offer clarifications of several relevant hypotheses and the experimental designs necessary to test them. We finally review the recent brain imaging literature, using formal languages, identifying areas of convergence and outstanding debates. We conclude that FLT has much to offer scientists who are interested in rigorous empirical investigations of human cognition from a neuroscientific and comparative perspective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3367694 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33676942012-07-19 Artificial grammar learning meets formal language theory: an overview Fitch, W. Tecumseh Friederici, Angela D. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Articles Formal language theory (FLT), part of the broader mathematical theory of computation, provides a systematic terminology and set of conventions for describing rules and the structures they generate, along with a rich body of discoveries and theorems concerning generative rule systems. Despite its name, FLT is not limited to human language, but is equally applicable to computer programs, music, visual patterns, animal vocalizations, RNA structure and even dance. In the last decade, this theory has been profitably used to frame hypotheses and to design brain imaging and animal-learning experiments, mostly using the ‘artificial grammar-learning’ paradigm. We offer a brief, non-technical introduction to FLT and then a more detailed analysis of empirical research based on this theory. We suggest that progress has been hampered by a pervasive conflation of distinct issues, including hierarchy, dependency, complexity and recursion. We offer clarifications of several relevant hypotheses and the experimental designs necessary to test them. We finally review the recent brain imaging literature, using formal languages, identifying areas of convergence and outstanding debates. We conclude that FLT has much to offer scientists who are interested in rigorous empirical investigations of human cognition from a neuroscientific and comparative perspective. The Royal Society 2012-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3367694/ /pubmed/22688631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0103 Text en This journal is © 2012 The Royal Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Fitch, W. Tecumseh Friederici, Angela D. Artificial grammar learning meets formal language theory: an overview |
title | Artificial grammar learning meets formal language theory: an overview |
title_full | Artificial grammar learning meets formal language theory: an overview |
title_fullStr | Artificial grammar learning meets formal language theory: an overview |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial grammar learning meets formal language theory: an overview |
title_short | Artificial grammar learning meets formal language theory: an overview |
title_sort | artificial grammar learning meets formal language theory: an overview |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3367694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22688631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0103 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fitchwtecumseh artificialgrammarlearningmeetsformallanguagetheoryanoverview AT friedericiangelad artificialgrammarlearningmeetsformallanguagetheoryanoverview |