Cargando…
The Influence of Spatial Registration on Detection of Cerebral Asymmetries Using Voxel-Based Statistics of Fractional Anisotropy Images and TBSS
The sensitivity of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) for detecting microstructural white matter alterations has motivated the application of voxel-based statistics (VBS) to fractional anisotropy (FA) images (FA-VBS). However, detected group differences may depend on the spatial registration method used...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3367973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22679481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036851 |
_version_ | 1782234895516434432 |
---|---|
author | Mohammadi, Siawoosh Keller, Simon S. Glauche, Volkmar Kugel, Harald Jansen, Andreas Hutton, Chloe Flöel, Agnes Deppe, Michael |
author_facet | Mohammadi, Siawoosh Keller, Simon S. Glauche, Volkmar Kugel, Harald Jansen, Andreas Hutton, Chloe Flöel, Agnes Deppe, Michael |
author_sort | Mohammadi, Siawoosh |
collection | PubMed |
description | The sensitivity of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) for detecting microstructural white matter alterations has motivated the application of voxel-based statistics (VBS) to fractional anisotropy (FA) images (FA-VBS). However, detected group differences may depend on the spatial registration method used. The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of spatial registration on detecting cerebral asymmetries in FA-VBS analyses with reference to data obtained using Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS). In the first part of this study we performed FA-VBS analyses using three single-contrast and one multi-contrast registration: (i) whole-brain registration based on T2 contrast, (ii) whole-brain registration based on FA contrast, (iii) individual-hemisphere registration based on FA contrast, and (iv) a combination of (i) and (iii). We then compared the FA-VBS results with those obtained from TBSS. We found that the FA-VBS results depended strongly on the employed registration approach, with the best correspondence between FA-VBS and TBSS results when approach (iv), the “multi-contrast individual-hemisphere” method was employed. In the second part of the study, we investigated the spatial distribution of residual misregistration for each registration approach and the effect on FA-VBS results. For the FA-VBS analyses using the three single-contrast registration methods, we identified FA asymmetries that were (a) located in regions prone to misregistrations, (b) not detected by TBSS, and (c) specific to the applied registration approach. These asymmetries were considered candidates for apparent FA asymmetries due to systematic misregistrations associated with the FA-VBS approach. Finally, we demonstrated that the “multi-contrast individual-hemisphere” approach showed the least residual spatial misregistrations and thus might be most appropriate for cerebral FA-VBS analyses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3367973 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33679732012-06-07 The Influence of Spatial Registration on Detection of Cerebral Asymmetries Using Voxel-Based Statistics of Fractional Anisotropy Images and TBSS Mohammadi, Siawoosh Keller, Simon S. Glauche, Volkmar Kugel, Harald Jansen, Andreas Hutton, Chloe Flöel, Agnes Deppe, Michael PLoS One Research Article The sensitivity of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) for detecting microstructural white matter alterations has motivated the application of voxel-based statistics (VBS) to fractional anisotropy (FA) images (FA-VBS). However, detected group differences may depend on the spatial registration method used. The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of spatial registration on detecting cerebral asymmetries in FA-VBS analyses with reference to data obtained using Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS). In the first part of this study we performed FA-VBS analyses using three single-contrast and one multi-contrast registration: (i) whole-brain registration based on T2 contrast, (ii) whole-brain registration based on FA contrast, (iii) individual-hemisphere registration based on FA contrast, and (iv) a combination of (i) and (iii). We then compared the FA-VBS results with those obtained from TBSS. We found that the FA-VBS results depended strongly on the employed registration approach, with the best correspondence between FA-VBS and TBSS results when approach (iv), the “multi-contrast individual-hemisphere” method was employed. In the second part of the study, we investigated the spatial distribution of residual misregistration for each registration approach and the effect on FA-VBS results. For the FA-VBS analyses using the three single-contrast registration methods, we identified FA asymmetries that were (a) located in regions prone to misregistrations, (b) not detected by TBSS, and (c) specific to the applied registration approach. These asymmetries were considered candidates for apparent FA asymmetries due to systematic misregistrations associated with the FA-VBS approach. Finally, we demonstrated that the “multi-contrast individual-hemisphere” approach showed the least residual spatial misregistrations and thus might be most appropriate for cerebral FA-VBS analyses. Public Library of Science 2012-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3367973/ /pubmed/22679481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036851 Text en Mohammadi et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mohammadi, Siawoosh Keller, Simon S. Glauche, Volkmar Kugel, Harald Jansen, Andreas Hutton, Chloe Flöel, Agnes Deppe, Michael The Influence of Spatial Registration on Detection of Cerebral Asymmetries Using Voxel-Based Statistics of Fractional Anisotropy Images and TBSS |
title | The Influence of Spatial Registration on Detection of Cerebral Asymmetries Using Voxel-Based Statistics of Fractional Anisotropy Images and TBSS |
title_full | The Influence of Spatial Registration on Detection of Cerebral Asymmetries Using Voxel-Based Statistics of Fractional Anisotropy Images and TBSS |
title_fullStr | The Influence of Spatial Registration on Detection of Cerebral Asymmetries Using Voxel-Based Statistics of Fractional Anisotropy Images and TBSS |
title_full_unstemmed | The Influence of Spatial Registration on Detection of Cerebral Asymmetries Using Voxel-Based Statistics of Fractional Anisotropy Images and TBSS |
title_short | The Influence of Spatial Registration on Detection of Cerebral Asymmetries Using Voxel-Based Statistics of Fractional Anisotropy Images and TBSS |
title_sort | influence of spatial registration on detection of cerebral asymmetries using voxel-based statistics of fractional anisotropy images and tbss |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3367973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22679481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036851 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohammadisiawoosh theinfluenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss AT kellersimons theinfluenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss AT glauchevolkmar theinfluenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss AT kugelharald theinfluenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss AT jansenandreas theinfluenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss AT huttonchloe theinfluenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss AT floelagnes theinfluenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss AT deppemichael theinfluenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss AT mohammadisiawoosh influenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss AT kellersimons influenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss AT glauchevolkmar influenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss AT kugelharald influenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss AT jansenandreas influenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss AT huttonchloe influenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss AT floelagnes influenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss AT deppemichael influenceofspatialregistrationondetectionofcerebralasymmetriesusingvoxelbasedstatisticsoffractionalanisotropyimagesandtbss |