Cargando…

Validation of two age dependent D-dimer cut-off values for exclusion of deep vein thrombosis in suspected elderly patients in primary care: retrospective, cross sectional, diagnostic analysis

Objective To determine whether the use of age adapted D-dimer cut-off values can be translated to primary care patients who are suspected of deep vein thrombosis. Design Retrospective, cross sectional diagnostic study. Setting 110 primary care doctors affiliated with three hospitals in the Netherlan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schouten, Henrike J, Koek, H L (Dineke), Oudega, Ruud, Geersing, Geert-Jan, Janssen, Kristel J M, van Delden, Johannes J M, Moons, Karel G M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3368485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22674922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e2985
_version_ 1782234959584428032
author Schouten, Henrike J
Koek, H L (Dineke)
Oudega, Ruud
Geersing, Geert-Jan
Janssen, Kristel J M
van Delden, Johannes J M
Moons, Karel G M
author_facet Schouten, Henrike J
Koek, H L (Dineke)
Oudega, Ruud
Geersing, Geert-Jan
Janssen, Kristel J M
van Delden, Johannes J M
Moons, Karel G M
author_sort Schouten, Henrike J
collection PubMed
description Objective To determine whether the use of age adapted D-dimer cut-off values can be translated to primary care patients who are suspected of deep vein thrombosis. Design Retrospective, cross sectional diagnostic study. Setting 110 primary care doctors affiliated with three hospitals in the Netherlands. Participants 1374 consecutive patients (936 (68.1%) aged >50 years) with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis. Main outcome measures Proportion of patients with D-dimer values below two proposed age adapted cut-off levels (age in years×10 μg/L in patients aged >50 years, or 750 μg/L in patients aged ≥60 years), in whom deep vein thrombosis could be excluded; and the number of false negative results. Results Using the Wells score, 647 patients had an unlikely clinical probability of deep vein thrombosis. In these patients (at all ages), deep vein thrombosis could be excluded in 309 (47.8%) using the age dependent cut-off value compared with 272 (42.0%) using the conventional cut-off value of 500 μg/L (increase 5.7%, 95% confidence interval 4.1% to 7.8%). This exclusion rate resulted in 0.5% and 0.3% false negative cases, respectively (increase 0.2%, 0.004% to 8.6%).The increase in exclusion rate by using the age dependent cut-off value was highest in the oldest patients. In patients older than 80 years, deep vein thrombosis could be safely excluded in 22 (35.5%) patients using the age dependent cut-off value compared with 13 (21.0%) using the conventional cut-off value (increase 14.5%, 6.8% to 25.8%). Compared with the age dependent cut-off value, the cut-off value of 750 μg/L had a similar exclusion rate (307 (47.4%) patients) and false negative rate (0.3%). Conclusions Combined with a low clinical probability of deep vein thrombosis, use of the age dependent D-dimer cut-off value for patients older than 50 years or the cut-off value of 750 μg/L for patients aged 60 years and older resulted in a considerable increase in the proportion of patients in primary care in whom deep vein thrombosis could be safely excluded, compared with the conventional cut-off value of 500 μg/L.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3368485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33684852012-06-07 Validation of two age dependent D-dimer cut-off values for exclusion of deep vein thrombosis in suspected elderly patients in primary care: retrospective, cross sectional, diagnostic analysis Schouten, Henrike J Koek, H L (Dineke) Oudega, Ruud Geersing, Geert-Jan Janssen, Kristel J M van Delden, Johannes J M Moons, Karel G M BMJ Research Objective To determine whether the use of age adapted D-dimer cut-off values can be translated to primary care patients who are suspected of deep vein thrombosis. Design Retrospective, cross sectional diagnostic study. Setting 110 primary care doctors affiliated with three hospitals in the Netherlands. Participants 1374 consecutive patients (936 (68.1%) aged >50 years) with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis. Main outcome measures Proportion of patients with D-dimer values below two proposed age adapted cut-off levels (age in years×10 μg/L in patients aged >50 years, or 750 μg/L in patients aged ≥60 years), in whom deep vein thrombosis could be excluded; and the number of false negative results. Results Using the Wells score, 647 patients had an unlikely clinical probability of deep vein thrombosis. In these patients (at all ages), deep vein thrombosis could be excluded in 309 (47.8%) using the age dependent cut-off value compared with 272 (42.0%) using the conventional cut-off value of 500 μg/L (increase 5.7%, 95% confidence interval 4.1% to 7.8%). This exclusion rate resulted in 0.5% and 0.3% false negative cases, respectively (increase 0.2%, 0.004% to 8.6%).The increase in exclusion rate by using the age dependent cut-off value was highest in the oldest patients. In patients older than 80 years, deep vein thrombosis could be safely excluded in 22 (35.5%) patients using the age dependent cut-off value compared with 13 (21.0%) using the conventional cut-off value (increase 14.5%, 6.8% to 25.8%). Compared with the age dependent cut-off value, the cut-off value of 750 μg/L had a similar exclusion rate (307 (47.4%) patients) and false negative rate (0.3%). Conclusions Combined with a low clinical probability of deep vein thrombosis, use of the age dependent D-dimer cut-off value for patients older than 50 years or the cut-off value of 750 μg/L for patients aged 60 years and older resulted in a considerable increase in the proportion of patients in primary care in whom deep vein thrombosis could be safely excluded, compared with the conventional cut-off value of 500 μg/L. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2012-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3368485/ /pubmed/22674922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e2985 Text en © Schouten et al 2012 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research
Schouten, Henrike J
Koek, H L (Dineke)
Oudega, Ruud
Geersing, Geert-Jan
Janssen, Kristel J M
van Delden, Johannes J M
Moons, Karel G M
Validation of two age dependent D-dimer cut-off values for exclusion of deep vein thrombosis in suspected elderly patients in primary care: retrospective, cross sectional, diagnostic analysis
title Validation of two age dependent D-dimer cut-off values for exclusion of deep vein thrombosis in suspected elderly patients in primary care: retrospective, cross sectional, diagnostic analysis
title_full Validation of two age dependent D-dimer cut-off values for exclusion of deep vein thrombosis in suspected elderly patients in primary care: retrospective, cross sectional, diagnostic analysis
title_fullStr Validation of two age dependent D-dimer cut-off values for exclusion of deep vein thrombosis in suspected elderly patients in primary care: retrospective, cross sectional, diagnostic analysis
title_full_unstemmed Validation of two age dependent D-dimer cut-off values for exclusion of deep vein thrombosis in suspected elderly patients in primary care: retrospective, cross sectional, diagnostic analysis
title_short Validation of two age dependent D-dimer cut-off values for exclusion of deep vein thrombosis in suspected elderly patients in primary care: retrospective, cross sectional, diagnostic analysis
title_sort validation of two age dependent d-dimer cut-off values for exclusion of deep vein thrombosis in suspected elderly patients in primary care: retrospective, cross sectional, diagnostic analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3368485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22674922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e2985
work_keys_str_mv AT schoutenhenrikej validationoftwoagedependentddimercutoffvaluesforexclusionofdeepveinthrombosisinsuspectedelderlypatientsinprimarycareretrospectivecrosssectionaldiagnosticanalysis
AT koekhldineke validationoftwoagedependentddimercutoffvaluesforexclusionofdeepveinthrombosisinsuspectedelderlypatientsinprimarycareretrospectivecrosssectionaldiagnosticanalysis
AT oudegaruud validationoftwoagedependentddimercutoffvaluesforexclusionofdeepveinthrombosisinsuspectedelderlypatientsinprimarycareretrospectivecrosssectionaldiagnosticanalysis
AT geersinggeertjan validationoftwoagedependentddimercutoffvaluesforexclusionofdeepveinthrombosisinsuspectedelderlypatientsinprimarycareretrospectivecrosssectionaldiagnosticanalysis
AT janssenkristeljm validationoftwoagedependentddimercutoffvaluesforexclusionofdeepveinthrombosisinsuspectedelderlypatientsinprimarycareretrospectivecrosssectionaldiagnosticanalysis
AT vandeldenjohannesjm validationoftwoagedependentddimercutoffvaluesforexclusionofdeepveinthrombosisinsuspectedelderlypatientsinprimarycareretrospectivecrosssectionaldiagnosticanalysis
AT moonskarelgm validationoftwoagedependentddimercutoffvaluesforexclusionofdeepveinthrombosisinsuspectedelderlypatientsinprimarycareretrospectivecrosssectionaldiagnosticanalysis