Cargando…

Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurements in Healthy Subjects Using Fourier and Time Domain Optical Coherence Tomography

Purpose. To compare the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measurements using two different ocular coherence tomography (OCT) devices: Cirrus Fourier domain OCT and Stratus time domain OCT. To analyze reproducibility of Fourier domain measurements in healthy subjects. Methods. One hundred and thirty-t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pinilla, Isabel, Garcia-Martin, Elena, Idoipe, Miriam, Sancho, Eva, Fuertes, Isabel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3368551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22690327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/107053
_version_ 1782234967891247104
author Pinilla, Isabel
Garcia-Martin, Elena
Idoipe, Miriam
Sancho, Eva
Fuertes, Isabel
author_facet Pinilla, Isabel
Garcia-Martin, Elena
Idoipe, Miriam
Sancho, Eva
Fuertes, Isabel
author_sort Pinilla, Isabel
collection PubMed
description Purpose. To compare the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measurements using two different ocular coherence tomography (OCT) devices: Cirrus Fourier domain OCT and Stratus time domain OCT. To analyze reproducibility of Fourier domain measurements in healthy subjects. Methods. One hundred and thirty-two eyes of 132 healthy subjects were scaned on the same day with both instruments, separated by 10 minutes from each other. Thickness of quadrant, average and the 12 different areas around the optic nerve were compared between Cirrus and Stratus. Repeatability, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and coefficients of variation (COVs) were calculated in RNFL measurements provided by Fourier domain device. Results. The average thickness in the optic cube was 95.50 μm using Cirrus and 97.85 μm using Stratus. Average thickness and temporal quadrant showed significant differences using Cirrus and Stratus methods. Reproducibility was better with Fourier domain OCT (mean COV of 4.54%) than with Stratus time-domain OCT (mean COV of 5.57%). Conclusions. Both scan options give reproducible RNFL thickness measurement, but there are differences between them. Measurements obtained using Fourier domain device show better reproducibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3368551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33685512012-06-11 Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurements in Healthy Subjects Using Fourier and Time Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Pinilla, Isabel Garcia-Martin, Elena Idoipe, Miriam Sancho, Eva Fuertes, Isabel J Ophthalmol Clinical Study Purpose. To compare the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measurements using two different ocular coherence tomography (OCT) devices: Cirrus Fourier domain OCT and Stratus time domain OCT. To analyze reproducibility of Fourier domain measurements in healthy subjects. Methods. One hundred and thirty-two eyes of 132 healthy subjects were scaned on the same day with both instruments, separated by 10 minutes from each other. Thickness of quadrant, average and the 12 different areas around the optic nerve were compared between Cirrus and Stratus. Repeatability, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and coefficients of variation (COVs) were calculated in RNFL measurements provided by Fourier domain device. Results. The average thickness in the optic cube was 95.50 μm using Cirrus and 97.85 μm using Stratus. Average thickness and temporal quadrant showed significant differences using Cirrus and Stratus methods. Reproducibility was better with Fourier domain OCT (mean COV of 4.54%) than with Stratus time-domain OCT (mean COV of 5.57%). Conclusions. Both scan options give reproducible RNFL thickness measurement, but there are differences between them. Measurements obtained using Fourier domain device show better reproducibility. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3368551/ /pubmed/22690327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/107053 Text en Copyright © 2012 Isabel Pinilla et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Pinilla, Isabel
Garcia-Martin, Elena
Idoipe, Miriam
Sancho, Eva
Fuertes, Isabel
Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurements in Healthy Subjects Using Fourier and Time Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
title Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurements in Healthy Subjects Using Fourier and Time Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
title_full Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurements in Healthy Subjects Using Fourier and Time Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
title_fullStr Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurements in Healthy Subjects Using Fourier and Time Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurements in Healthy Subjects Using Fourier and Time Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
title_short Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurements in Healthy Subjects Using Fourier and Time Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
title_sort comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements in healthy subjects using fourier and time domain optical coherence tomography
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3368551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22690327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/107053
work_keys_str_mv AT pinillaisabel comparisonofretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessmeasurementsinhealthysubjectsusingfourierandtimedomainopticalcoherencetomography
AT garciamartinelena comparisonofretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessmeasurementsinhealthysubjectsusingfourierandtimedomainopticalcoherencetomography
AT idoipemiriam comparisonofretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessmeasurementsinhealthysubjectsusingfourierandtimedomainopticalcoherencetomography
AT sanchoeva comparisonofretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessmeasurementsinhealthysubjectsusingfourierandtimedomainopticalcoherencetomography
AT fuertesisabel comparisonofretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessmeasurementsinhealthysubjectsusingfourierandtimedomainopticalcoherencetomography