Cargando…

Development and Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Attitudes and Beliefs about Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Use among Cancer Patients

Despite cancer patients' extensive use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), validated instruments to measure attitudes, and beliefs predictive of CAM use are lacking. We aimed at developing and validating an instrument, attitudes and beliefs about CAM (ABCAM). The 15-item instrument...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mao, Jun J., Palmer, Steve C., Desai, Krupali, Li, Susan Q., Armstrong, Katrina, Xie, Sharon X.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3369496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22693532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/798098
_version_ 1782235069215145984
author Mao, Jun J.
Palmer, Steve C.
Desai, Krupali
Li, Susan Q.
Armstrong, Katrina
Xie, Sharon X.
author_facet Mao, Jun J.
Palmer, Steve C.
Desai, Krupali
Li, Susan Q.
Armstrong, Katrina
Xie, Sharon X.
author_sort Mao, Jun J.
collection PubMed
description Despite cancer patients' extensive use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), validated instruments to measure attitudes, and beliefs predictive of CAM use are lacking. We aimed at developing and validating an instrument, attitudes and beliefs about CAM (ABCAM). The 15-item instrument was developed using the theory of planned behavior (TPB) as a framework. The literature review, qualitative interviews, expert content review, and cognitive interviews were used to develop the instrument, which was then administered to 317 outpatient oncology patients. The ABCAM was best represented as a 3-factor structure: expected benefits, perceived barriers, and subjective norms related to CAM use by cancer patients. These domains had Eigenvalues of 4.79, 2.37, and 1.43, and together explained over 57.2% of the variance. The 4-item expected benefits, 7-item perceived barriers, and 4-item subjective norms domain scores, each had an acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) of 0.91, 0.76, and 0.75, respectively. As expected, CAM users had higher expected benefits, lower perceived barriers, and more positive subjective norms (all P < 0.001) than those who did not use CAM. Our study provides the initial evidence that the ABCAM instrument produced reliable and valid scores that measured attitudes and beliefs related to CAM use among cancer patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3369496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33694962012-06-12 Development and Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Attitudes and Beliefs about Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Use among Cancer Patients Mao, Jun J. Palmer, Steve C. Desai, Krupali Li, Susan Q. Armstrong, Katrina Xie, Sharon X. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Research Article Despite cancer patients' extensive use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), validated instruments to measure attitudes, and beliefs predictive of CAM use are lacking. We aimed at developing and validating an instrument, attitudes and beliefs about CAM (ABCAM). The 15-item instrument was developed using the theory of planned behavior (TPB) as a framework. The literature review, qualitative interviews, expert content review, and cognitive interviews were used to develop the instrument, which was then administered to 317 outpatient oncology patients. The ABCAM was best represented as a 3-factor structure: expected benefits, perceived barriers, and subjective norms related to CAM use by cancer patients. These domains had Eigenvalues of 4.79, 2.37, and 1.43, and together explained over 57.2% of the variance. The 4-item expected benefits, 7-item perceived barriers, and 4-item subjective norms domain scores, each had an acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) of 0.91, 0.76, and 0.75, respectively. As expected, CAM users had higher expected benefits, lower perceived barriers, and more positive subjective norms (all P < 0.001) than those who did not use CAM. Our study provides the initial evidence that the ABCAM instrument produced reliable and valid scores that measured attitudes and beliefs related to CAM use among cancer patients. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3369496/ /pubmed/22693532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/798098 Text en Copyright © 2012 Jun J. Mao et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mao, Jun J.
Palmer, Steve C.
Desai, Krupali
Li, Susan Q.
Armstrong, Katrina
Xie, Sharon X.
Development and Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Attitudes and Beliefs about Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Use among Cancer Patients
title Development and Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Attitudes and Beliefs about Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Use among Cancer Patients
title_full Development and Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Attitudes and Beliefs about Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Use among Cancer Patients
title_fullStr Development and Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Attitudes and Beliefs about Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Use among Cancer Patients
title_full_unstemmed Development and Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Attitudes and Beliefs about Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Use among Cancer Patients
title_short Development and Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Attitudes and Beliefs about Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Use among Cancer Patients
title_sort development and validation of an instrument for measuring attitudes and beliefs about complementary and alternative medicine (cam) use among cancer patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3369496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22693532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/798098
work_keys_str_mv AT maojunj developmentandvalidationofaninstrumentformeasuringattitudesandbeliefsaboutcomplementaryandalternativemedicinecamuseamongcancerpatients
AT palmerstevec developmentandvalidationofaninstrumentformeasuringattitudesandbeliefsaboutcomplementaryandalternativemedicinecamuseamongcancerpatients
AT desaikrupali developmentandvalidationofaninstrumentformeasuringattitudesandbeliefsaboutcomplementaryandalternativemedicinecamuseamongcancerpatients
AT lisusanq developmentandvalidationofaninstrumentformeasuringattitudesandbeliefsaboutcomplementaryandalternativemedicinecamuseamongcancerpatients
AT armstrongkatrina developmentandvalidationofaninstrumentformeasuringattitudesandbeliefsaboutcomplementaryandalternativemedicinecamuseamongcancerpatients
AT xiesharonx developmentandvalidationofaninstrumentformeasuringattitudesandbeliefsaboutcomplementaryandalternativemedicinecamuseamongcancerpatients