Cargando…

Random process estimator for laser speckle imaging of cerebral blood flow

In this paper, we develop a random process theory to explain the laser speckle phenomena. The relation between the probability distribution of speckle’s integrated intensity random process [Formula: see text] and the relative velocity [Formula: see text] is derived. Based on the random process theor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miao, Peng, Li, Nan, Thakor, Nitish V., Tong, Shanbao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Optical Society of America 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3369537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20173842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.000218
Descripción
Sumario:In this paper, we develop a random process theory to explain the laser speckle phenomena. The relation between the probability distribution of speckle’s integrated intensity random process [Formula: see text] and the relative velocity [Formula: see text] is derived. Based on the random process theory, traditional spatial or temporal laser speckle contrast analysis (i.e. spatial or temporal LASCA) can be derived as the spatial or temporal estimators respectively. Both spatial LASCA and temporal LASCA suffer from noise due to insufficient statistics and nonstationarity in either spatial or temporal domain. Furthermore, either LASCA results in a reduction of spatial or temporal resolution. A new random process estimator is proposed and able to overcome these drawbacks. In an in-vitro study, random process estimator outperforms either spatial LASCA or temporal LASCA by providing much higher SNR (random process estimator vs. spatial LASCA vs. temporal LASCA: 33.64±6.87 ( [Formula: see text]) vs. 9.08±2.85 vs. 3.83±1.05). In an in-vivo structural imaging study, random process estimator efficiently suppresses the noise in contrast image and thus improves the distinguishability of small vessels. In a functional imaging study of cerebral blood flow change in the somatosensory cortex induced by rat’s hind paw stimulation, random process estimator provides much lower estimation errors in single trial data (random process estimator vs. temporal LASCA: 0.31±0.03 vs. 1.36±0.09) and finally leads to higher resolution spatiotemporal patterns of cerebral blood flow.