Cargando…

Bayesian Cohort and Cross-Sectional Analyses of the PINCER Trial: A Pharmacist-Led Intervention to Reduce Medication Errors in Primary Care

BACKGROUND: Medication errors are an important source of potentially preventable morbidity and mortality. The PINCER study, a cluster randomised controlled trial, is one of the world’s first experimental studies aiming to reduce the risk of such medication related potential for harm in general pract...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hemming, Karla, Chilton, Peter J., Lilford, Richard J., Avery, Anthony, Sheikh, Aziz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3369915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22685559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038306
_version_ 1782235107777576960
author Hemming, Karla
Chilton, Peter J.
Lilford, Richard J.
Avery, Anthony
Sheikh, Aziz
author_facet Hemming, Karla
Chilton, Peter J.
Lilford, Richard J.
Avery, Anthony
Sheikh, Aziz
author_sort Hemming, Karla
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medication errors are an important source of potentially preventable morbidity and mortality. The PINCER study, a cluster randomised controlled trial, is one of the world’s first experimental studies aiming to reduce the risk of such medication related potential for harm in general practice. Bayesian analyses can improve the clinical interpretability of trial findings. METHODS: Experts were asked to complete a questionnaire to elicit opinions of the likely effectiveness of the intervention for the key outcomes of interest - three important primary care medication errors. These were averaged to generate collective prior distributions, which were then combined with trial data to generate Bayesian posterior distributions. The trial data were analysed in two ways: firstly replicating the trial reported cohort analysis acknowledging pairing of observations, but excluding non-paired observations; and secondly as cross-sectional data, with no exclusions, but without acknowledgement of the pairing. Frequentist and Bayesian analyses were compared. FINDINGS: Bayesian evaluations suggest that the intervention is able to reduce the likelihood of one of the medication errors by about 50 (estimated to be between 20% and 70%). However, for the other two main outcomes considered, the evidence that the intervention is able to reduce the likelihood of prescription errors is less conclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians are interested in what trial results mean to them, as opposed to what trial results suggest for future experiments. This analysis suggests that the PINCER intervention is strongly effective in reducing the likelihood of one of the important errors; not necessarily effective in reducing the other errors. Depending on the clinical importance of the respective errors, careful consideration should be given before implementation, and refinement targeted at the other errors may be something to consider.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3369915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33699152012-06-08 Bayesian Cohort and Cross-Sectional Analyses of the PINCER Trial: A Pharmacist-Led Intervention to Reduce Medication Errors in Primary Care Hemming, Karla Chilton, Peter J. Lilford, Richard J. Avery, Anthony Sheikh, Aziz PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Medication errors are an important source of potentially preventable morbidity and mortality. The PINCER study, a cluster randomised controlled trial, is one of the world’s first experimental studies aiming to reduce the risk of such medication related potential for harm in general practice. Bayesian analyses can improve the clinical interpretability of trial findings. METHODS: Experts were asked to complete a questionnaire to elicit opinions of the likely effectiveness of the intervention for the key outcomes of interest - three important primary care medication errors. These were averaged to generate collective prior distributions, which were then combined with trial data to generate Bayesian posterior distributions. The trial data were analysed in two ways: firstly replicating the trial reported cohort analysis acknowledging pairing of observations, but excluding non-paired observations; and secondly as cross-sectional data, with no exclusions, but without acknowledgement of the pairing. Frequentist and Bayesian analyses were compared. FINDINGS: Bayesian evaluations suggest that the intervention is able to reduce the likelihood of one of the medication errors by about 50 (estimated to be between 20% and 70%). However, for the other two main outcomes considered, the evidence that the intervention is able to reduce the likelihood of prescription errors is less conclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians are interested in what trial results mean to them, as opposed to what trial results suggest for future experiments. This analysis suggests that the PINCER intervention is strongly effective in reducing the likelihood of one of the important errors; not necessarily effective in reducing the other errors. Depending on the clinical importance of the respective errors, careful consideration should be given before implementation, and refinement targeted at the other errors may be something to consider. Public Library of Science 2012-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3369915/ /pubmed/22685559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038306 Text en Hemming et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hemming, Karla
Chilton, Peter J.
Lilford, Richard J.
Avery, Anthony
Sheikh, Aziz
Bayesian Cohort and Cross-Sectional Analyses of the PINCER Trial: A Pharmacist-Led Intervention to Reduce Medication Errors in Primary Care
title Bayesian Cohort and Cross-Sectional Analyses of the PINCER Trial: A Pharmacist-Led Intervention to Reduce Medication Errors in Primary Care
title_full Bayesian Cohort and Cross-Sectional Analyses of the PINCER Trial: A Pharmacist-Led Intervention to Reduce Medication Errors in Primary Care
title_fullStr Bayesian Cohort and Cross-Sectional Analyses of the PINCER Trial: A Pharmacist-Led Intervention to Reduce Medication Errors in Primary Care
title_full_unstemmed Bayesian Cohort and Cross-Sectional Analyses of the PINCER Trial: A Pharmacist-Led Intervention to Reduce Medication Errors in Primary Care
title_short Bayesian Cohort and Cross-Sectional Analyses of the PINCER Trial: A Pharmacist-Led Intervention to Reduce Medication Errors in Primary Care
title_sort bayesian cohort and cross-sectional analyses of the pincer trial: a pharmacist-led intervention to reduce medication errors in primary care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3369915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22685559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038306
work_keys_str_mv AT hemmingkarla bayesiancohortandcrosssectionalanalysesofthepincertrialapharmacistledinterventiontoreducemedicationerrorsinprimarycare
AT chiltonpeterj bayesiancohortandcrosssectionalanalysesofthepincertrialapharmacistledinterventiontoreducemedicationerrorsinprimarycare
AT lilfordrichardj bayesiancohortandcrosssectionalanalysesofthepincertrialapharmacistledinterventiontoreducemedicationerrorsinprimarycare
AT averyanthony bayesiancohortandcrosssectionalanalysesofthepincertrialapharmacistledinterventiontoreducemedicationerrorsinprimarycare
AT sheikhaziz bayesiancohortandcrosssectionalanalysesofthepincertrialapharmacistledinterventiontoreducemedicationerrorsinprimarycare