Cargando…
Cochlear Implant Outcomes: A Comparison between Irradiated and Non-irradiated Ears
OBJECTIVES: Radiotherapy for head and neck tumors is known to potentially induce sensorineural hearing loss, which is possibly due to damage to the cochlear and/or auditory pathways. Since the success of cochlear implantation depends on a functional auditory nerve, this paper aims to study the heari...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3369992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22701157 http://dx.doi.org/10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S93 |
_version_ | 1782235125861318656 |
---|---|
author | Soh, Jie Min D'Souza, Vishal Deepak Sarepaka, Gopal Krishna Ng, Win Nie Ong, Chun Suan Low, Wong Kein |
author_facet | Soh, Jie Min D'Souza, Vishal Deepak Sarepaka, Gopal Krishna Ng, Win Nie Ong, Chun Suan Low, Wong Kein |
author_sort | Soh, Jie Min |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Radiotherapy for head and neck tumors is known to potentially induce sensorineural hearing loss, which is possibly due to damage to the cochlear and/or auditory pathways. Since the success of cochlear implantation depends on a functional auditory nerve, this paper aims to study the hearing outcomes of cochlear implantation in irradiated ears. METHODS: A retrospective study of cochlear implant recipients from our institution who had previously received radiotherapy for head and neck cancers was performed. A control group with cochlear implants who did not receive radiotherapy was recruited. A review of case records, speech discrimination scores (SDS), and a validated subjective questionnaire in the form of the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) was administered to the study group who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Global and category scores in both groups were averaged and statistically compared via non-inferiority (NI) testing. RESULTS: With the control group (n=8) as the reference, the -ΔNI was defined, and a one-tailed lower 95% confidence interval was used for the irradiated group (n=8). The APHAB degree of improvement (%) results were as follows: global, 28.9% (19.32%, -ΔNI=16.3%); ease of communication, 67.0% (58.36%, -ΔNI=37.5%); background noise, 53.2% (44.14%, -ΔNI=26.8%); reverberation, 41.7% (28.85%, -ΔNI=32.7%); and aversiveness, -46.2% (-67.80%, -ΔNI=-56.9%). The SDS was 66.9% (56.02%, -ΔNI=51.0%). From the results, lower 95% confidence interval limits of global APHAB, SDS, ease of communication, and background noise scores of the irradiated group were within the defined -ΔNI boundary and hence are not inferior to the control. The categories of reverberation and aversiveness could not be proven, however. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated marked improvements in hearing measured both objectively and subjectively. The overall hearing outcomes after cochlear implantation for post-irradiated patients were not worse than patients who have had no prior irradiation to ear structures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3369992 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33699922012-06-13 Cochlear Implant Outcomes: A Comparison between Irradiated and Non-irradiated Ears Soh, Jie Min D'Souza, Vishal Deepak Sarepaka, Gopal Krishna Ng, Win Nie Ong, Chun Suan Low, Wong Kein Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol Original Article OBJECTIVES: Radiotherapy for head and neck tumors is known to potentially induce sensorineural hearing loss, which is possibly due to damage to the cochlear and/or auditory pathways. Since the success of cochlear implantation depends on a functional auditory nerve, this paper aims to study the hearing outcomes of cochlear implantation in irradiated ears. METHODS: A retrospective study of cochlear implant recipients from our institution who had previously received radiotherapy for head and neck cancers was performed. A control group with cochlear implants who did not receive radiotherapy was recruited. A review of case records, speech discrimination scores (SDS), and a validated subjective questionnaire in the form of the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) was administered to the study group who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Global and category scores in both groups were averaged and statistically compared via non-inferiority (NI) testing. RESULTS: With the control group (n=8) as the reference, the -ΔNI was defined, and a one-tailed lower 95% confidence interval was used for the irradiated group (n=8). The APHAB degree of improvement (%) results were as follows: global, 28.9% (19.32%, -ΔNI=16.3%); ease of communication, 67.0% (58.36%, -ΔNI=37.5%); background noise, 53.2% (44.14%, -ΔNI=26.8%); reverberation, 41.7% (28.85%, -ΔNI=32.7%); and aversiveness, -46.2% (-67.80%, -ΔNI=-56.9%). The SDS was 66.9% (56.02%, -ΔNI=51.0%). From the results, lower 95% confidence interval limits of global APHAB, SDS, ease of communication, and background noise scores of the irradiated group were within the defined -ΔNI boundary and hence are not inferior to the control. The categories of reverberation and aversiveness could not be proven, however. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated marked improvements in hearing measured both objectively and subjectively. The overall hearing outcomes after cochlear implantation for post-irradiated patients were not worse than patients who have had no prior irradiation to ear structures. Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2012-04 2012-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3369992/ /pubmed/22701157 http://dx.doi.org/10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S93 Text en Copyright © 2012 by Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Soh, Jie Min D'Souza, Vishal Deepak Sarepaka, Gopal Krishna Ng, Win Nie Ong, Chun Suan Low, Wong Kein Cochlear Implant Outcomes: A Comparison between Irradiated and Non-irradiated Ears |
title | Cochlear Implant Outcomes: A Comparison between Irradiated and Non-irradiated Ears |
title_full | Cochlear Implant Outcomes: A Comparison between Irradiated and Non-irradiated Ears |
title_fullStr | Cochlear Implant Outcomes: A Comparison between Irradiated and Non-irradiated Ears |
title_full_unstemmed | Cochlear Implant Outcomes: A Comparison between Irradiated and Non-irradiated Ears |
title_short | Cochlear Implant Outcomes: A Comparison between Irradiated and Non-irradiated Ears |
title_sort | cochlear implant outcomes: a comparison between irradiated and non-irradiated ears |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3369992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22701157 http://dx.doi.org/10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S93 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sohjiemin cochlearimplantoutcomesacomparisonbetweenirradiatedandnonirradiatedears AT dsouzavishaldeepak cochlearimplantoutcomesacomparisonbetweenirradiatedandnonirradiatedears AT sarepakagopalkrishna cochlearimplantoutcomesacomparisonbetweenirradiatedandnonirradiatedears AT ngwinnie cochlearimplantoutcomesacomparisonbetweenirradiatedandnonirradiatedears AT ongchunsuan cochlearimplantoutcomesacomparisonbetweenirradiatedandnonirradiatedears AT lowwongkein cochlearimplantoutcomesacomparisonbetweenirradiatedandnonirradiatedears |