Cargando…

Cochlear Implant Outcomes: A Comparison between Irradiated and Non-irradiated Ears

OBJECTIVES: Radiotherapy for head and neck tumors is known to potentially induce sensorineural hearing loss, which is possibly due to damage to the cochlear and/or auditory pathways. Since the success of cochlear implantation depends on a functional auditory nerve, this paper aims to study the heari...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soh, Jie Min, D'Souza, Vishal Deepak, Sarepaka, Gopal Krishna, Ng, Win Nie, Ong, Chun Suan, Low, Wong Kein
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3369992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22701157
http://dx.doi.org/10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S93
_version_ 1782235125861318656
author Soh, Jie Min
D'Souza, Vishal Deepak
Sarepaka, Gopal Krishna
Ng, Win Nie
Ong, Chun Suan
Low, Wong Kein
author_facet Soh, Jie Min
D'Souza, Vishal Deepak
Sarepaka, Gopal Krishna
Ng, Win Nie
Ong, Chun Suan
Low, Wong Kein
author_sort Soh, Jie Min
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Radiotherapy for head and neck tumors is known to potentially induce sensorineural hearing loss, which is possibly due to damage to the cochlear and/or auditory pathways. Since the success of cochlear implantation depends on a functional auditory nerve, this paper aims to study the hearing outcomes of cochlear implantation in irradiated ears. METHODS: A retrospective study of cochlear implant recipients from our institution who had previously received radiotherapy for head and neck cancers was performed. A control group with cochlear implants who did not receive radiotherapy was recruited. A review of case records, speech discrimination scores (SDS), and a validated subjective questionnaire in the form of the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) was administered to the study group who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Global and category scores in both groups were averaged and statistically compared via non-inferiority (NI) testing. RESULTS: With the control group (n=8) as the reference, the -ΔNI was defined, and a one-tailed lower 95% confidence interval was used for the irradiated group (n=8). The APHAB degree of improvement (%) results were as follows: global, 28.9% (19.32%, -ΔNI=16.3%); ease of communication, 67.0% (58.36%, -ΔNI=37.5%); background noise, 53.2% (44.14%, -ΔNI=26.8%); reverberation, 41.7% (28.85%, -ΔNI=32.7%); and aversiveness, -46.2% (-67.80%, -ΔNI=-56.9%). The SDS was 66.9% (56.02%, -ΔNI=51.0%). From the results, lower 95% confidence interval limits of global APHAB, SDS, ease of communication, and background noise scores of the irradiated group were within the defined -ΔNI boundary and hence are not inferior to the control. The categories of reverberation and aversiveness could not be proven, however. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated marked improvements in hearing measured both objectively and subjectively. The overall hearing outcomes after cochlear implantation for post-irradiated patients were not worse than patients who have had no prior irradiation to ear structures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3369992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33699922012-06-13 Cochlear Implant Outcomes: A Comparison between Irradiated and Non-irradiated Ears Soh, Jie Min D'Souza, Vishal Deepak Sarepaka, Gopal Krishna Ng, Win Nie Ong, Chun Suan Low, Wong Kein Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol Original Article OBJECTIVES: Radiotherapy for head and neck tumors is known to potentially induce sensorineural hearing loss, which is possibly due to damage to the cochlear and/or auditory pathways. Since the success of cochlear implantation depends on a functional auditory nerve, this paper aims to study the hearing outcomes of cochlear implantation in irradiated ears. METHODS: A retrospective study of cochlear implant recipients from our institution who had previously received radiotherapy for head and neck cancers was performed. A control group with cochlear implants who did not receive radiotherapy was recruited. A review of case records, speech discrimination scores (SDS), and a validated subjective questionnaire in the form of the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) was administered to the study group who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Global and category scores in both groups were averaged and statistically compared via non-inferiority (NI) testing. RESULTS: With the control group (n=8) as the reference, the -ΔNI was defined, and a one-tailed lower 95% confidence interval was used for the irradiated group (n=8). The APHAB degree of improvement (%) results were as follows: global, 28.9% (19.32%, -ΔNI=16.3%); ease of communication, 67.0% (58.36%, -ΔNI=37.5%); background noise, 53.2% (44.14%, -ΔNI=26.8%); reverberation, 41.7% (28.85%, -ΔNI=32.7%); and aversiveness, -46.2% (-67.80%, -ΔNI=-56.9%). The SDS was 66.9% (56.02%, -ΔNI=51.0%). From the results, lower 95% confidence interval limits of global APHAB, SDS, ease of communication, and background noise scores of the irradiated group were within the defined -ΔNI boundary and hence are not inferior to the control. The categories of reverberation and aversiveness could not be proven, however. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated marked improvements in hearing measured both objectively and subjectively. The overall hearing outcomes after cochlear implantation for post-irradiated patients were not worse than patients who have had no prior irradiation to ear structures. Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2012-04 2012-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3369992/ /pubmed/22701157 http://dx.doi.org/10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S93 Text en Copyright © 2012 by Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Soh, Jie Min
D'Souza, Vishal Deepak
Sarepaka, Gopal Krishna
Ng, Win Nie
Ong, Chun Suan
Low, Wong Kein
Cochlear Implant Outcomes: A Comparison between Irradiated and Non-irradiated Ears
title Cochlear Implant Outcomes: A Comparison between Irradiated and Non-irradiated Ears
title_full Cochlear Implant Outcomes: A Comparison between Irradiated and Non-irradiated Ears
title_fullStr Cochlear Implant Outcomes: A Comparison between Irradiated and Non-irradiated Ears
title_full_unstemmed Cochlear Implant Outcomes: A Comparison between Irradiated and Non-irradiated Ears
title_short Cochlear Implant Outcomes: A Comparison between Irradiated and Non-irradiated Ears
title_sort cochlear implant outcomes: a comparison between irradiated and non-irradiated ears
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3369992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22701157
http://dx.doi.org/10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S93
work_keys_str_mv AT sohjiemin cochlearimplantoutcomesacomparisonbetweenirradiatedandnonirradiatedears
AT dsouzavishaldeepak cochlearimplantoutcomesacomparisonbetweenirradiatedandnonirradiatedears
AT sarepakagopalkrishna cochlearimplantoutcomesacomparisonbetweenirradiatedandnonirradiatedears
AT ngwinnie cochlearimplantoutcomesacomparisonbetweenirradiatedandnonirradiatedears
AT ongchunsuan cochlearimplantoutcomesacomparisonbetweenirradiatedandnonirradiatedears
AT lowwongkein cochlearimplantoutcomesacomparisonbetweenirradiatedandnonirradiatedears