Cargando…

Cross-cultural comparison of correlates of quality of life and health status: the Whitehall II Study (UK) and the Western New York Health Study (US)

Measures of quality of life (QoL) have been found to be predictors of mortality and morbidity; however, there is still limited understanding of the multifaceted nature of these measures and of potential correlates. Using two large populations from the UK and US, we aimed to evaluate and compare meas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Franco, Oscar H., Wong, Yim Lun, Kandala, Ngianga-Bakwin, Ferrie, Jane E., Dorn, Joan M., Kivimäki, Mika, Clarke, Aileen, Donahue, Richard P., Manoux, Archana Singh, Freudenheim, Jo L., Trevisan, Maurizio, Stranges, Saverio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3370162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22392587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10654-012-9664-z
_version_ 1782235130130071552
author Franco, Oscar H.
Wong, Yim Lun
Kandala, Ngianga-Bakwin
Ferrie, Jane E.
Dorn, Joan M.
Kivimäki, Mika
Clarke, Aileen
Donahue, Richard P.
Manoux, Archana Singh
Freudenheim, Jo L.
Trevisan, Maurizio
Stranges, Saverio
author_facet Franco, Oscar H.
Wong, Yim Lun
Kandala, Ngianga-Bakwin
Ferrie, Jane E.
Dorn, Joan M.
Kivimäki, Mika
Clarke, Aileen
Donahue, Richard P.
Manoux, Archana Singh
Freudenheim, Jo L.
Trevisan, Maurizio
Stranges, Saverio
author_sort Franco, Oscar H.
collection PubMed
description Measures of quality of life (QoL) have been found to be predictors of mortality and morbidity; however, there is still limited understanding of the multifaceted nature of these measures and of potential correlates. Using two large populations from the UK and US, we aimed to evaluate and compare measured levels of QoL and the key factors correlated with these levels. Participants were 6,472 white subjects (1,829 women) from the Whitehall II Study (mean age 55.8 years) and 3,684 white subjects (1,903 women) from the Western New York Health Study (mean age 58.7 years). QoL was assessed in both using the physical and mental health component summaries of the short form-36 questionnaire (SF-36). Analysis of covariance was used to compare gender-specific mean scores for the two populations across several potential correlates (including socio-demographic, lifestyle and co-morbidity factors). Levels of reported physical QoL tended to be higher in the UK population (51.2 vs. 48.6) while mental QoL was higher in the US group (53.1 vs. 51.1). Age, sleep duration and depressive symptoms were the main factors correlated with both physical and mental QoL in both samples. Increasing age was associated with poorer physical health but higher mental health scores in both populations (P < 0.001). Sleep duration below 6 or above 8 h was associated with lower levels of QoL. Depressive symptoms were strongly associated with poorer mental health scores (P < 0.001) while higher BMI, lower physical activity levels and presence of cardiovascular disease were associated with poorer physical health in both samples and gender (P < 0.05). There were consistent findings for correlates of QoL in this cross-cultural comparison of two populations from the UK and US. Strongest associations were between lifestyle and co-morbidity factors and the physical health component of the SF-36 rather than the mental health component. This is a novel finding which warrants further consideration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3370162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33701622012-06-14 Cross-cultural comparison of correlates of quality of life and health status: the Whitehall II Study (UK) and the Western New York Health Study (US) Franco, Oscar H. Wong, Yim Lun Kandala, Ngianga-Bakwin Ferrie, Jane E. Dorn, Joan M. Kivimäki, Mika Clarke, Aileen Donahue, Richard P. Manoux, Archana Singh Freudenheim, Jo L. Trevisan, Maurizio Stranges, Saverio Eur J Epidemiol Methods Measures of quality of life (QoL) have been found to be predictors of mortality and morbidity; however, there is still limited understanding of the multifaceted nature of these measures and of potential correlates. Using two large populations from the UK and US, we aimed to evaluate and compare measured levels of QoL and the key factors correlated with these levels. Participants were 6,472 white subjects (1,829 women) from the Whitehall II Study (mean age 55.8 years) and 3,684 white subjects (1,903 women) from the Western New York Health Study (mean age 58.7 years). QoL was assessed in both using the physical and mental health component summaries of the short form-36 questionnaire (SF-36). Analysis of covariance was used to compare gender-specific mean scores for the two populations across several potential correlates (including socio-demographic, lifestyle and co-morbidity factors). Levels of reported physical QoL tended to be higher in the UK population (51.2 vs. 48.6) while mental QoL was higher in the US group (53.1 vs. 51.1). Age, sleep duration and depressive symptoms were the main factors correlated with both physical and mental QoL in both samples. Increasing age was associated with poorer physical health but higher mental health scores in both populations (P < 0.001). Sleep duration below 6 or above 8 h was associated with lower levels of QoL. Depressive symptoms were strongly associated with poorer mental health scores (P < 0.001) while higher BMI, lower physical activity levels and presence of cardiovascular disease were associated with poorer physical health in both samples and gender (P < 0.05). There were consistent findings for correlates of QoL in this cross-cultural comparison of two populations from the UK and US. Strongest associations were between lifestyle and co-morbidity factors and the physical health component of the SF-36 rather than the mental health component. This is a novel finding which warrants further consideration. Springer Netherlands 2012-03-04 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3370162/ /pubmed/22392587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10654-012-9664-z Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Methods
Franco, Oscar H.
Wong, Yim Lun
Kandala, Ngianga-Bakwin
Ferrie, Jane E.
Dorn, Joan M.
Kivimäki, Mika
Clarke, Aileen
Donahue, Richard P.
Manoux, Archana Singh
Freudenheim, Jo L.
Trevisan, Maurizio
Stranges, Saverio
Cross-cultural comparison of correlates of quality of life and health status: the Whitehall II Study (UK) and the Western New York Health Study (US)
title Cross-cultural comparison of correlates of quality of life and health status: the Whitehall II Study (UK) and the Western New York Health Study (US)
title_full Cross-cultural comparison of correlates of quality of life and health status: the Whitehall II Study (UK) and the Western New York Health Study (US)
title_fullStr Cross-cultural comparison of correlates of quality of life and health status: the Whitehall II Study (UK) and the Western New York Health Study (US)
title_full_unstemmed Cross-cultural comparison of correlates of quality of life and health status: the Whitehall II Study (UK) and the Western New York Health Study (US)
title_short Cross-cultural comparison of correlates of quality of life and health status: the Whitehall II Study (UK) and the Western New York Health Study (US)
title_sort cross-cultural comparison of correlates of quality of life and health status: the whitehall ii study (uk) and the western new york health study (us)
topic Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3370162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22392587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10654-012-9664-z
work_keys_str_mv AT francooscarh crossculturalcomparisonofcorrelatesofqualityoflifeandhealthstatusthewhitehalliistudyukandthewesternnewyorkhealthstudyus
AT wongyimlun crossculturalcomparisonofcorrelatesofqualityoflifeandhealthstatusthewhitehalliistudyukandthewesternnewyorkhealthstudyus
AT kandalangiangabakwin crossculturalcomparisonofcorrelatesofqualityoflifeandhealthstatusthewhitehalliistudyukandthewesternnewyorkhealthstudyus
AT ferriejanee crossculturalcomparisonofcorrelatesofqualityoflifeandhealthstatusthewhitehalliistudyukandthewesternnewyorkhealthstudyus
AT dornjoanm crossculturalcomparisonofcorrelatesofqualityoflifeandhealthstatusthewhitehalliistudyukandthewesternnewyorkhealthstudyus
AT kivimakimika crossculturalcomparisonofcorrelatesofqualityoflifeandhealthstatusthewhitehalliistudyukandthewesternnewyorkhealthstudyus
AT clarkeaileen crossculturalcomparisonofcorrelatesofqualityoflifeandhealthstatusthewhitehalliistudyukandthewesternnewyorkhealthstudyus
AT donahuerichardp crossculturalcomparisonofcorrelatesofqualityoflifeandhealthstatusthewhitehalliistudyukandthewesternnewyorkhealthstudyus
AT manouxarchanasingh crossculturalcomparisonofcorrelatesofqualityoflifeandhealthstatusthewhitehalliistudyukandthewesternnewyorkhealthstudyus
AT freudenheimjol crossculturalcomparisonofcorrelatesofqualityoflifeandhealthstatusthewhitehalliistudyukandthewesternnewyorkhealthstudyus
AT trevisanmaurizio crossculturalcomparisonofcorrelatesofqualityoflifeandhealthstatusthewhitehalliistudyukandthewesternnewyorkhealthstudyus
AT strangessaverio crossculturalcomparisonofcorrelatesofqualityoflifeandhealthstatusthewhitehalliistudyukandthewesternnewyorkhealthstudyus