Cargando…

Numerical comparison of X-ray differential phase contrast and attenuation contrast

We present a numerical tool to compare directly the contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) of the attenuation- and differential phase-contrast signals available from grating-based X-ray imaging for single radiographs. The attenuation projection is differentiated to bring it into a modality comparable to the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hahn, Dieter, Thibault, Pierre, Bech, Martin, Stockmar, Marco, Schleede, Simone, Zanette, Irene, Rack, Alexander, Weitkamp, Timm, Sztrókay, Aniko, Schlossbauer, Thomas, Bamberg, Fabian, Reiser, Maximilian, Pfeiffer, Franz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Optical Society of America 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3370957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22741063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.3.001141
_version_ 1782235152539189248
author Hahn, Dieter
Thibault, Pierre
Bech, Martin
Stockmar, Marco
Schleede, Simone
Zanette, Irene
Rack, Alexander
Weitkamp, Timm
Sztrókay, Aniko
Schlossbauer, Thomas
Bamberg, Fabian
Reiser, Maximilian
Pfeiffer, Franz
author_facet Hahn, Dieter
Thibault, Pierre
Bech, Martin
Stockmar, Marco
Schleede, Simone
Zanette, Irene
Rack, Alexander
Weitkamp, Timm
Sztrókay, Aniko
Schlossbauer, Thomas
Bamberg, Fabian
Reiser, Maximilian
Pfeiffer, Franz
author_sort Hahn, Dieter
collection PubMed
description We present a numerical tool to compare directly the contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) of the attenuation- and differential phase-contrast signals available from grating-based X-ray imaging for single radiographs. The attenuation projection is differentiated to bring it into a modality comparable to the differential phase projection using a Gaussian derivative filter. A Relative Contrast Gain (RCG) is then defined as the ratio of the CNR of image values in a region of interest (ROI) in the differential phase projection to the CNR of image values in the same ROI in the differential attenuation projection. We apply the method on experimental data of human breast tissue acquired using a grating interferometer to compare the two contrast modes for two regions of interest differing in the type of tissue. Our results indicate that the proposed method can be used as a local estimate of the spatial distribution of the ratio δ/β, i.e., real and imaginary part of the complex refractive index, across a sample.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3370957
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Optical Society of America
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33709572012-06-27 Numerical comparison of X-ray differential phase contrast and attenuation contrast Hahn, Dieter Thibault, Pierre Bech, Martin Stockmar, Marco Schleede, Simone Zanette, Irene Rack, Alexander Weitkamp, Timm Sztrókay, Aniko Schlossbauer, Thomas Bamberg, Fabian Reiser, Maximilian Pfeiffer, Franz Biomed Opt Express X-Ray Microscopy and Imaging We present a numerical tool to compare directly the contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) of the attenuation- and differential phase-contrast signals available from grating-based X-ray imaging for single radiographs. The attenuation projection is differentiated to bring it into a modality comparable to the differential phase projection using a Gaussian derivative filter. A Relative Contrast Gain (RCG) is then defined as the ratio of the CNR of image values in a region of interest (ROI) in the differential phase projection to the CNR of image values in the same ROI in the differential attenuation projection. We apply the method on experimental data of human breast tissue acquired using a grating interferometer to compare the two contrast modes for two regions of interest differing in the type of tissue. Our results indicate that the proposed method can be used as a local estimate of the spatial distribution of the ratio δ/β, i.e., real and imaginary part of the complex refractive index, across a sample. Optical Society of America 2012-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3370957/ /pubmed/22741063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.3.001141 Text en © 2012 Optical Society of America http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License, which permits download and redistribution, provided that the original work is properly cited. This license restricts the article from being modified or used commercially.
spellingShingle X-Ray Microscopy and Imaging
Hahn, Dieter
Thibault, Pierre
Bech, Martin
Stockmar, Marco
Schleede, Simone
Zanette, Irene
Rack, Alexander
Weitkamp, Timm
Sztrókay, Aniko
Schlossbauer, Thomas
Bamberg, Fabian
Reiser, Maximilian
Pfeiffer, Franz
Numerical comparison of X-ray differential phase contrast and attenuation contrast
title Numerical comparison of X-ray differential phase contrast and attenuation contrast
title_full Numerical comparison of X-ray differential phase contrast and attenuation contrast
title_fullStr Numerical comparison of X-ray differential phase contrast and attenuation contrast
title_full_unstemmed Numerical comparison of X-ray differential phase contrast and attenuation contrast
title_short Numerical comparison of X-ray differential phase contrast and attenuation contrast
title_sort numerical comparison of x-ray differential phase contrast and attenuation contrast
topic X-Ray Microscopy and Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3370957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22741063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/BOE.3.001141
work_keys_str_mv AT hahndieter numericalcomparisonofxraydifferentialphasecontrastandattenuationcontrast
AT thibaultpierre numericalcomparisonofxraydifferentialphasecontrastandattenuationcontrast
AT bechmartin numericalcomparisonofxraydifferentialphasecontrastandattenuationcontrast
AT stockmarmarco numericalcomparisonofxraydifferentialphasecontrastandattenuationcontrast
AT schleedesimone numericalcomparisonofxraydifferentialphasecontrastandattenuationcontrast
AT zanetteirene numericalcomparisonofxraydifferentialphasecontrastandattenuationcontrast
AT rackalexander numericalcomparisonofxraydifferentialphasecontrastandattenuationcontrast
AT weitkamptimm numericalcomparisonofxraydifferentialphasecontrastandattenuationcontrast
AT sztrokayaniko numericalcomparisonofxraydifferentialphasecontrastandattenuationcontrast
AT schlossbauerthomas numericalcomparisonofxraydifferentialphasecontrastandattenuationcontrast
AT bambergfabian numericalcomparisonofxraydifferentialphasecontrastandattenuationcontrast
AT reisermaximilian numericalcomparisonofxraydifferentialphasecontrastandattenuationcontrast
AT pfeifferfranz numericalcomparisonofxraydifferentialphasecontrastandattenuationcontrast