Cargando…

Validity, reliability and stability of the portable Cortex Metamax 3B gas analysis system

This study investigated the performance of the portable Cortex Metamax 3B (MM3B) automated gas analysis system during both simulated and human exercise using adolescents. Repeated measures using a Gas Exchange System Validator (GESV) across a range of simulated metabolic rates, showed the MM3B to be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Macfarlane, D. J., Wong, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3371330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22075643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-2230-7
_version_ 1782235185390026752
author Macfarlane, D. J.
Wong, P.
author_facet Macfarlane, D. J.
Wong, P.
author_sort Macfarlane, D. J.
collection PubMed
description This study investigated the performance of the portable Cortex Metamax 3B (MM3B) automated gas analysis system during both simulated and human exercise using adolescents. Repeated measures using a Gas Exchange System Validator (GESV) across a range of simulated metabolic rates, showed the MM3B to be adequately reliable (both percentage errors, and percentage technical error of measurements <2%) for measuring expired ventilation (V (E)), oxygen consumption (VO(2)), and carbon dioxide production (VCO(2)). Over a 3 h period, the MM3B was shown to be acceptably stable in measuring gas fractions, as well as V (E), VO(2), and VCO(2) generated by the GESV, especially at moderate and high metabolic rates (drifts <2% and of minor physiological significance). Using eight healthy adolescents during rest, moderate, and vigorous cycle ergometry, the validity of the MM3B was tested against the primary criterion Douglas bag method (DBM) and a secondary criterion machine known to be accurate, the Jaeger Oxycon Pro system. No significant errors in V (E) were noted, yet the MM3B significantly overestimated both VO(2) and VCO(2) by approximately 10–17% at moderate and vigorous exercise as compared to the DBM and at all exercise levels compared to the Oxycon Pro. No significant differences were seen in any metabolic variable between the two criterion systems (DBM and Oxycon Pro). It is concluded the MM3B produces acceptably stable and reliable results, but is not adequately valid during moderate and vigorous exercise without some further correction of VO(2) and VCO(2).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3371330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33713302012-06-14 Validity, reliability and stability of the portable Cortex Metamax 3B gas analysis system Macfarlane, D. J. Wong, P. Eur J Appl Physiol Original Article This study investigated the performance of the portable Cortex Metamax 3B (MM3B) automated gas analysis system during both simulated and human exercise using adolescents. Repeated measures using a Gas Exchange System Validator (GESV) across a range of simulated metabolic rates, showed the MM3B to be adequately reliable (both percentage errors, and percentage technical error of measurements <2%) for measuring expired ventilation (V (E)), oxygen consumption (VO(2)), and carbon dioxide production (VCO(2)). Over a 3 h period, the MM3B was shown to be acceptably stable in measuring gas fractions, as well as V (E), VO(2), and VCO(2) generated by the GESV, especially at moderate and high metabolic rates (drifts <2% and of minor physiological significance). Using eight healthy adolescents during rest, moderate, and vigorous cycle ergometry, the validity of the MM3B was tested against the primary criterion Douglas bag method (DBM) and a secondary criterion machine known to be accurate, the Jaeger Oxycon Pro system. No significant errors in V (E) were noted, yet the MM3B significantly overestimated both VO(2) and VCO(2) by approximately 10–17% at moderate and vigorous exercise as compared to the DBM and at all exercise levels compared to the Oxycon Pro. No significant differences were seen in any metabolic variable between the two criterion systems (DBM and Oxycon Pro). It is concluded the MM3B produces acceptably stable and reliable results, but is not adequately valid during moderate and vigorous exercise without some further correction of VO(2) and VCO(2). Springer-Verlag 2011-11-11 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3371330/ /pubmed/22075643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-2230-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Macfarlane, D. J.
Wong, P.
Validity, reliability and stability of the portable Cortex Metamax 3B gas analysis system
title Validity, reliability and stability of the portable Cortex Metamax 3B gas analysis system
title_full Validity, reliability and stability of the portable Cortex Metamax 3B gas analysis system
title_fullStr Validity, reliability and stability of the portable Cortex Metamax 3B gas analysis system
title_full_unstemmed Validity, reliability and stability of the portable Cortex Metamax 3B gas analysis system
title_short Validity, reliability and stability of the portable Cortex Metamax 3B gas analysis system
title_sort validity, reliability and stability of the portable cortex metamax 3b gas analysis system
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3371330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22075643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-2230-7
work_keys_str_mv AT macfarlanedj validityreliabilityandstabilityoftheportablecortexmetamax3bgasanalysissystem
AT wongp validityreliabilityandstabilityoftheportablecortexmetamax3bgasanalysissystem